J. Madhavan et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 17 (2010) 338–343
343
subsequently converted to other products, step by step. Similarly,
different reaction intermediates due to the different reaction pos-
sibilities, like hydrogen abstraction, hydroxyl radical addition
etc., would occur in the present study.
(2) Even though the sonophotocatalysis process is shown to be
more efficient than the individual processes for the degrada-
tion of OG, only an additive effect of combining sonolysis
and photocatalysis was observed rather than a synergy
effect. TOC studies also support the above conclusion.
(3) Aniline, phenol and aromatic hydroxyl amine are formed as
the intermediates during the sonolysis process.
In order to identify reaction by-products accompanying OG deg-
radation, samples collected at various time intervals were analyzed
by means of HPLC and ESMS. The results indicate that sonolysis de-
grades the azo group of OG and results in its irreversible transfor-
mation into a number of products including aromatic amines.
HPLC chromatogram obtained for the sonication of OG at differ-
ent time intervals is given in Fig. 6. As seen in Fig. 6, the peak due to
OG (Rt = 300–380 s) decreased with increased sonication time
while the peaks for the products correspondingly increased. The
major product of sonication is 7-hydroxy-8-(hydroxyamino)naph-
thalene-1,3-disulfonic acid (I) (Rt = 100–130 s) was found as a pro-
tonated form in the mass spectrum. Formation of aniline and
phenol were confirmed by comparing the retention time of pure
aniline and phenol standards with the retention time of the reac-
tion sample at 170–200 s and 140–170 s, respectively (Scheme 1).
By comparing the product formation yields, it was observed that
the quantity of aniline (II) formation was very low and this leads to
the conclusion that it undergoes further degradation into other
products. Since sonolysis mainly involves the attack of OH radicals
on the aromatic ring, it can be expected that the first intermediates
formed would be OH-added products of OG. Apart from aniline,
other products detected were also OH-added products such as 5,7-
dihydroxy-8-[(E)-phenyldiazenyl]naphthalene-1,3-disulfonic acid
(IV, m/z 424) and 8-[(E)-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)diazenyl]-5,7-dihy-
droxynaphthalene-1,3-disulfonic acid (V, m/z 456). The above ESMS
findings together with the results of HPLC support the notion that
during the sonolytic oxidation of dye molecule two processes occur
(a) hydroxylation of the aromatic ring and, (b) reductive cleavage of
the azo bond that lead to the formation of aromatic primary amines.
From all our observations, it can be concluded that partially
water soluble materials such as OG do not degrade synergistically
using a combined AOP process. Also, enhanced degradation by
operating ultrasound in the presence of particles, for these types
of pollutants is not observed under our operating conditions.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank DIISR, Australia and DST, New Delhi for the
financial support of an India–Australian strategic research fund
(INT/AUS/P-1/07 dated 19 September 2007).
References
[1] U. Pagga, D. Brown, Chemosphere 15 (1986) 479.
[2] M. Boeninger, Carcinogenicity and Metabolism of Azo Dyes Especially those
Derived from Benzidine, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication 80-1 19, US Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC, July 1990.
[3] F. Rafii, W. Franklin, C.E. Cerniglia, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56 (1990) 2146.
[4] C. Rafols, D. Barcelo, J. Chromatogr. A 777 (1997) 177.
[5] A. Houas, H. Lachheb, M. Ksibi, E. Elaloui, C. Guillard, J.M. Hermann, Appl. Catal.
B: Environ. 31 (2001) 145.
[6] M.A. Brown, S.C. Crit, Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23 (1993) 249.
[7] A.B. Prevot, C. Baiocchi, M.C. Brussino, E. Pramauro, P. Savarino, V. Augugliaro,
G. Marci, L. Palmisano, Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 971.
[8] D.F. Ollis, Solar-assisted Photocatalysis for Water Purification: Issues, Data
Questions in Photochemical Conversion and Storage of Solar Energy, Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991. p. 593.
[9] J. Kiwi, C. Pulgarin, P. Peringer, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 3 (1994) 335.
[10] R. Singla, F. Grieser, M. Ashokkumar, Ultrason. Sonochem. 16 (2009) 28.
[11] C. Berberidou, I. Poulios, N.P. Xekoukoulotakis, D. Mantzavinos, Appl. Catal. B:
Environ. 74 (2007) 63.
[12] M. Ashokkumar, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 23 (1998) 427.
[13] T. Lesko, A.J. Colussi, M.R. Hoffmann, Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (2006) 6818.
[14] L.K. Weavers, M.R. Hoffmann, Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 (1998) 3941.
[15] J.W. Kang, H.M. Hung, A. Lin, M.R. Hoffmann, Environ. Sci. Technol. 33 (1999)
3199.
[16] V. Ragaini, E. Selli, C.L. Bianchi, C. Pirola, Ultrason. Sonochem. 8 (2001) 251.
[17] J. Peller, O. Wiest, P.V. Kamat, Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (2003) 1926.
[18] E. Selli, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4 (2002) 6123.
[19] A.F. Collings, P.B. Gwan, A.P. Sosa Pintos, Sep. Sci. Technol. 42 (2007) 1565.
[20] B. Muktha, G. Madras, T.N.G. Row, U. Scherf, S. Patil, J. Phys. Chem. B 111
(2007) 7994.
[21] P. Mahata, G. Madras, S. Natarajan, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 13759.
[22] K. Nagaveni, G. Sivalingam, M.S. Hegde, G. Madras, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 48
(2004) 83.
4. Conclusions
[23] J. Sun, L. Qiao, S. Sun, G. Wang, J. Hazard. Mater. 155 (2008) 312.
[24] N.H. Ince, G. Tezcanli, R.K. Belen, I.G. Apikyan, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 29
(2001) 167.
The conclusions drawn from this study can be summarized as
follows:
[25] N. Serpone, E. Pelizzetti (Eds.), Photocatalysis: Fundamentals and Applications,
Wiley, New York, 1989.
[26] R. Singla, M. Ashokkumar, F. Grieser, Res. Chem. Intermed. 30 (2004) 723.
[27] L.C. Chen, T.C. Chou, J. Mol. Catal. 85 (1993) 201.
[28] M. Trilks, J. Peral, X. Domenech, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 3 (1993) 45.
[29] C.H. Hung, P.C. Chiang, C. Yuan, C.Y. Chou, Water Sci. Technol. 43 (2001) 313.
[30] K.E. O’shea, C. Cardona, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 91 (1995) 67.
[31] Y.G. Aduwuyi, Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 3409.
[32] Y.G. Aduwuyi, Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 8557.
[33] A.D. Bokare, R.C. Chikate, C.V. Rode, K.M. Paknikar, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 79
(2008) 270.
(1) Degradation of OG depends on the initial dye concentration
and pH of the reaction mixture. Sonolytic degradation is
favoured at acidic pH and the reverse is true for the photo-
catalyic degradation. The surface active nature of OG at
acidic pH can account for the higher degradation efficiency
in acidic pH during sonication. In the case of photocatalysis,
the higher concentration of OHꢁ ions at pH 12 produces
more hydroxyl radicals than at pH 5.8 and hence a higher
degradation rate at elevated pH.
[34] H. Kanazawa, T. Onami, Color. Technol. 117 (2001) 323.