In conclusion, we have systematically explored the reactivity
profile of nitro-phenylsubstituted acetylenes in the cycloaddition–
cycloreversion process with a series of oxygenated dienes. The
importance of the ortho nitro moiety on the phenyl acetylene has
been clearly demonstrated. Further exploration into the use of the
DAB strategy will be reported in due course.
The authors would like to acknowledge the National Science
Foundation for financial support (CHE-0549884). In addition, the
authors would like to thank Professor Kevin P. Gable (OSU) for his
assistance with the computational data, Professor Max Deinzer
(Mass Spectrometry Facility, Environmental Health Sciences
Center, Oregon State University) and Dr Jeff Morre´ (Mass Spec-
trometry Facility, Environmental Health Sciences Center, Oregon
State University) for mass spectra data and Michael R. Naffziger
(OSU) and Dr Roger Hanselmann (Rib-X Pharmaceuticals) for
their helpful discussions.
J. S. Panek and S. R. Duff, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 5745–54;
(e) F. Effenberger and T. Ziegler, Chem. Ber., 1987, 120, 1339–46; (f) B.
Sain and J. S. Sandhu, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 2545–46; (g) D. M.
Smith and B. J. L. Royles, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1994, 355–58;
(h) M. D’Auria, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 6567–70; (i) A. Avenoza,
J. H. Busto, C. Cativiela and J. M. Peregrina, Synthesis, 1995, 671–74;
(j) L. Balzs, I. Kdas and L. To˜ke, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 7583–
87; (k) M. D. Watson, A. Fechtenkotter and K. Mullen, Chem. Rev.,
2001, 101, 1267–300; (l) S.-H. Min, Y.-W. Kim, S. Choi, K. B. Park and
C.-G. Cho, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2002, 23, 1021–22; (m) G. Hilt
and K. I. Smolko, Synthesis, 2002, 686–92; (n) G. Hilt, K. I. Smolko
and B. V. Lotsch, Synlett, 2002, 1081–84; (o) J. E. Moore, M. York and
J. P. A. Harrity, Synlett, 2005, 860–62; (p) T. Yamato, M. Miyamoto, T.
Hironaka and Y. Miura, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 3–6; (q) G. Hilt, F. Galbiati
and K. Harms, Synthesis, 2006, 3575–84.
4 Aldrich catalog # 519456.
5 Compound 2: Aldrich catalog # 217166. Compound 4: Aldrich catalog
# 423424.
6 R. R. Gonzalez, L. Liguori, A. M. Carrillo and H.-R. Bjorsvik, J. Org.
Chem., 2005, 70, 9591–94.
7 M. Okada, T. Nakagawa, S. Iwashita, S. Takegawa, T. Fujii and N.
Koizumi, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol., 2004, 87, 141–48.
8 J. Savard and P. Brassard, Tetrahedron, 1984, 40, 3455–64.
9 J.-H. Li, X.-D. Zhang and Y.-X. Xie, Synthesis, 2005, 804–08.
10 J. R. Beadle, D. M. Dishong, R. K. Khanna and G. W. Gokel,
Tetrahedron, 1984, 40, 3935–44.
11 N. Arai and K. Narasaka, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1995, 68, 1707–14.
12 L. Alcaraz, A. Baxter, J. Bent, K. Bowers, M. Braddock, D. Clading-
boel, D. Donald, M. Fagura, M. Furber, C. Laurent, M. Lawson, M.
Mortimore, M. McCormick, N. Roberts and M. Robertson, Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett., 2003, 13, 4043–46.
Notes and references
1 K.-I. Takao, R. Munakata and K.-I. Tadano, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105,
4779–807.
2 (a) B. O. Ashburn and R. G. Carter, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2006, 45, 6737–41; (b) B. O. Ashburn, R. G. Carter and L. N.
Zakharov, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 9109–16; (c) M. R. Naffziger,
B. O. Ashburn, J. R. Perkins and R. G. Carter, J. Org. Chem.,
DOI: 10.1021/jo070740r; (d) B. O. Ashburn and R. G. Carter,
J. Org. Chem., DOI: 10.1021/jo070812e; (e) B. O. Ashburn,
L. K. Rathbone, E. H. Camp and R. G. Carter, Tetrahedron,
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet/2007/10/118.
3 (a) J. A. Reed, C. L. Schilling, R. F. Tarvin, T. A. Rettig and J. K. Stille,
J. Org. Chem., 1969, 34, 2188–92; (b) E. McDonald, A. Suksamrarn and
R. D. Wylie, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1979, 1893–900; (c) S. M.
Weinreb, F. Z. Basha, S. Hibino, N. A. Khatri, D. Kim, W. E. Pye
and T.-T. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 536–44; (d) D. L. Boger,
13 I. G. C. Coutts, N. J. Culbert, M. Edwards, J. A. Hadfield, D. R. Musto,
P. H. Vasilios and D. J. Richards, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1985,
9, 1829–36.
14 A table detailing the calculated energies is provided in the ESI.† The
ꢀ
molecular modelling program Spartan 06 was used to carry out the
density functional B3LYP calculations. The 6-31G** basis set was
chosen to better optimize the structures and calculate the molecular
orbital energies and coefficients. Computations were performed using
a Linux workstation running Spartan version ꢀ06.
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2008, 6, 255–257 | 257
©