Dichloride Fe(II) Clathrochelate with Dimercaptomaleodinitrile
Scheme 4
are caused by nucleophilic substitutions with the trans-form
of dimercaptomaleodinitrile: this results in the formation of
polymeric products. Low yield was also caused by both the
high reactivity and the thiophilicity of 2; similar behavior is
observed for the dichloride clathrochelate precursor 1.
Attempts to optimize the reaction conditions by the choice
of a solvent and to obtain 2 in higher yield failed. An
unexpected result was obtained when nitromethane was used
as a solvent: its reaction with the potassium salt of dimer-
captomaleodinitrile followed by the condensation of the
reaction products, which probably contain nitrothiophene 4,
with precursor 1 led to clathrochelate complex 3 with an
annulated thiazinothiophene heterocycle in the ribbed frag-
ment (Scheme 2).
The formation of clathrochelate 3 under the conditions of
interphase catalysis can be explained by hindering of the
dimercaptomaleodinitrile dianion-tetra-n-butylammonium
cation ionic pair phase transfer. At the same time, the
monocharged and lipophilic 2-cyano-3-mercapto-4-amino-
5-nitrothiophene anion, formed by the condensation of
dimercaptomaleodinitrile with nitromethane, can be ef-
ficiently transferred to the organic phase in the form of an
ionic pair with the Bu4N+ cation followed by nucleophilic
substitution with Vic-dihalogenide clathrochelate 1 (Scheme
2).
The feasible route for the formation of the substituted
nitrothiophene 4 is shown in Scheme 2. Attempts to isolate
pure heterocycle 4 failed because of the low stability of this
product and the presence of almost inseparable impurities.
Nevertheless, in situ condensation with reactive dichloride
precursor 1 gave the clathrochelate derivative 3 of this
heterocycle, and this complex proved to be sufficiently stable
to be isolated chromatographically. The second possible
pathway to this complex (nucleophilic substitution with one
of the two thiolate groups of mercaptomaleodinitrile at the
first step) is also shown in Scheme 2.
A literature search for structural fragment 5 (Scheme 3)
has revealed only two articles,31,32 and they describe the
different systems. This allows one to conclude that a
previously unknown heterocyclic system has been obtained.
The synthesized complexes 2 and 3 were characterized
by spectroscopic methods and X-ray crystallography. The
asymmetric unit cell of crystal 2 contains two crystallo-
graphically independent clathrochelate molecules A and B
with similar molecular structures (Figure 1) as well as the
benzene solvate molecules. The coordination polyhedron of
the encapsulated iron(II) ion possesses a distorted trigonal-
prismatic (TP) geometry. The almost parallel triangular bases
of the TP coordination polyhedron are formed by N1 ·N3 ·N5
and N2 ·N4 ·N6 nitrogen atoms, whereas its ribbed fragments
are formed by N1· · · N2, N3· · · N4, and N5· · ·N6
chelate cycles. The average distortion angle in passing
from a TP ( ) 0°) to a trigonal antiprism (TAP, ) 60°)
and the height h of the coordination polyhedron (the distance
between the centers of the TP triangular bases) are equal to
48.03; H, 2.42; N, 14.4; S, 7.33; Fe, 6.38%. MS (MALDI-TOF):
m/z: (positive range) 875 [M]+•; (negative range) –874 [M - H+]-.
1H NMR (CD2Cl2): δ (ppm) 10.08 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.26 (m, 20H,
Ph). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ (ppm) 106.0 (s, CtN), 110.0 (s,
CCN), 126.3 (s, CNO2), 128.40, 128.41 (both s, Ph), 129.31 (s,
Ph), 129.33 (s, NCCS), 130.0 (s, NCCS), 130.7 (s, Ph), 130.83,
130.86 (both s, Ph), 132.3 (s, SCdN), 135.9 (s, NCdN), 157.5 (s,
PhCdN), 157.8 (s, PhCdN). IR (KBr): 1547 ν(SCdN + NCdN),
1576 ν(PhCdN), 899, 933, 1061, 1109 ν(N-O), 1221 m ν(B-O)
+ ν(B-F), 1620 δ(N-H), 2216 ν(CtN). UV–vis (methylene
dichloride): λmax (10-3 ꢀ, mol-1 L cm-1) 254 (30), 283 (18), 305
(14), 335 (5.6), 365 (5.5), 392 (4.8), 440 (8.7), 479 (19), 512 (6.0),
538 (10), 571 (6.8) 601 (4.2) nm. Mössbauer 57Fe (mm s-1): IS )
0.36, QS ) 0.63.
X-ray Crystallography. Details of the crystal data collection
and refinement parameters for 2 and 3 are listed in Table 1. Single
crystals of these complexes were grown from isooctane-benzene
and acetone-heptane mixtures at room temperature.
The single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments for complexes
2 and 3 were carried out with Bruker SMART 1K and SMART
APEX II CCD diffractometers, using graphite monochromated Mo
KR radiation (λ ) 0.710 73 Å). Reflection intensities were
integrated using SAINT software28 and corrected for absorption
by semiempirical methods (SADABS program29).
The structures were solved by the direct method and refined by
a full-matrix least-squares method against F2 of all data, using the
SHELXTL software.30 Non-hydrogen atoms were refined with
anisotropic displacement parameters. The positions of hydrogen
atoms were calculated and included in refinement in isotropic
approximation by the riding model with Uiso(H) ) nUeq(C), where
n ) 1.5 for methyl groups and 1.2 for the other groups.
Results and Discussion
The easiest pathway to the precursor of the ribbed-
functionalized phthalocyaninoclathrochelates is based on the
condensation of reactive Vic-clathrochelate 1 with a salt of
dimercaptomaleodinitrile dianion (Scheme 1).
Despite the fact that the Vic-dichloride iron(II) clathro-
chelate easily reacts with thiolate anions,12,14–17,19–23 in
CH3CN/DMF, its nucleophilic substitution with the potas-
sium salt of dimercaptomaleodinitrile under different condi-
tions led to the target complex 2 only in low yield (∼15%).
The formation of a mixture of byproducts with low chro-
matographic mobility was also observed. These side reactions
(28) SMART and SAINT, Release 5.0, Area Detector Control and Integra-
tion Software; Bruker AXS: Madison, WI, 1998.
(29) Sheldrick, G. M. SADABS: A Program for Exploiting the Redundancy
of Area Detector X-Ray Data; University of Göttingen: Göttingen,
Germany, 1999.
(30) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL, version 5.1; Bruker AXS: Madison, WI,
1997.
(31) Grol, C. J.; Rollema, H.; Dijkstra, D.; Westerink, B. H. C. J. Med.
Chem. 1980, 23, 322.
(32) Grol, C. J.; Rollema, H. J. Med. Chem. 1975, 18, 857.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 47, No. 6, 2008 2159