Bini et al.
JOCArticle
TABLE 1. Solvent Parameters13
H bond
donor acidity, R
H bond
acceptor basicity, β
cohesive pressure,
δ2 (J cm-3
solvent
acetonitrile
N,N-dimethylformamide
[bmim][PF6]
[bmim][Tf2N]
dipolarity/polarizability, π*
)
permittivity, ε
0.190
0.000
0.634
0.617
0.381
0.427
0.310
0.690
0.207
0.243
0.239
0.252
0.750
0.880
1.032
0.984
1.010
0.954
590
164
718
554
625
506
35.9
36.7
11.4
11.6
[bm2im][Tf2N]
[bmpyrr][Tf2N]
11.7
Composed exclusively by ions, ILs differ significantly from
water and organic solvents. The strong ion-ion interactions
present in ILs lead to highly structured materials, three-
dimensional polymeric networks of anions and cations
linked by H-bonds and/or Coulombic interactions, often
characterized by the presence of polar and nonpolar re-
gions.5 In the case of imidazolium-based ionic liquids, the
most investigated ILs, the existence of dynamic heteroge-
neous environments have been reported; molecules are
trapped for a relatively long period in quasistatic local
solvent cages.6 This trapping time, which is longer than in
molecular solvents, together with the inability of the sur-
roundings to adiabatically relax, induces a set of site-specific
spectroscopic responses (excitation-wavelength-dependent
fluorescence spectrum).7 Although in principle this hetero-
geneity might also affect reactivity, rarely has a hypothesis
about the consequences of these structural features on reac-
tion rate and/or selectivity been made. The effect of dynamic
heterogeneity on reaction rates have been considered only
for very fast reactions.8 Generally, the kinetic behavior of
homogeneous reactions carried out in ILs have been ratio-
nalized in terms of transition state theory; the solvent
modifies the Gibbs energy of activation by differential
solvation of reactants and the activated complex, consider-
ing that solvent averaging occurs in a sufficiently short time
to guarantee the absence of any heterogeneity.
Here, we report on the IL solvent effect on Menschutkin
reaction, i.e., the quaternization of a tertiary amine (N-
methylimidazole) by benzyl halides. The reaction is formally
an alkyl group transfer,9 a process of central importance in
biochemistry and a widely used strategy in organic synthesis; it
is the reaction generally used to prepare ILs. Numerous
physical organic studies have been conducted on the
Menschutkin reaction,10 and it is a useful test system for
theoretical methods.11 Moreover, a recent study by Neta
et al.12 on the kinetic behavior of the Menschutkin reaction of
1,2-dimethylimidazole with benzyl bromide has shown that the
reaction is moderately affected by the ionic medium, although
the process is characterized by an increase of charge on going
from reagents to the transition state (TS). This result is quite
surprising, especially if we consider that the monopolar charge
character of the constituent ions of ILs should lead to sub-
stantial solvation stabilization of the charged Menschutkin TS.
This paper investigates this behavior in more depth.
Results and Discussion
Effect of Solvent on Reaction Rate. The Menschutkin
substitution reaction of N-methylimidazole and benzyl
halides (Scheme 1) has been investigated in two molecular
solvents (acetonitrile and N,N-dimethylformamide) and four
ILs (1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethane-
sulfonyl)imide [bmpy][Tf2N], 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium
bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide [bmim][Tf2N], 1-butyl-
2,3-dimethylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide
[bm2im][Tf2N], and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluoro-
phosphate [bmim][PF6]), each having different macro- and
microscopic physicochemical properties (Table 1).13
The kinetic measurements were carried out by following
the disappearance of the benzyl halides at selected wave-
lengths between 260 and 300 nm, well above the cutoff of the
ILs used as solvents (240 and 200 nm for imidazolium-based
and pyrrolidinium-based ILs, respectively). The experiments
were performed under pseudo-first-order conditions, using a
large excess of N-methylimidazole, in a temperature range
between 290 and 330 K. Kinetic data (absorbances vs time)
were fitted with the exponential eq 1:
AðtÞ ¼ Ainf þ ðA0 - Ainf Þ expð - kobstÞ
ð1Þ
where A(t) is the absorbance at time t, Ainf is the absorbance
at the final time, A0 is the absorbance at the initial time and
kobs is the observed rate constant.
Nucleophilic substitution reactions, occurring through
mono- and bimolecular processes (SN1 and SN2), are gen-
erally described by eq 2:
-d½substrateꢀ=dt ¼ ½substrateꢀ½k2½nucleophileꢀ þ k1ꢀ ð2Þ
However, under the pseudo-first-order conditions (large
excess of nucleophile) employed in this study, kobs may be
defined as
(5) Lopes, J. N. A.; Padua, A. A. H. J. Phys. Chem B 2006, 110, 3330.
Chiappe, C. Monatsh. Chem. 2007, 137, 1035. Xiao, D; Rajian, J. R.; Hines,
L. G.; Li, S.; Bartsch, R. A.; Quitevis, E. L. J. Phys. Chem B 2008, 112, 13316.
Consorti, C, S.; Suarez, P. A. Z.; de Souza, R. F.; Burrow, R. A.; Farrar, D.
H.; Lough, A. J.; Loh, W.; da Silva, L. H. M.; Dupont, J. J. Phys. Chem. B
2005, 109, 4341.
(6) Hu, Z.; Margulis, C. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 831.
(7) Mandal, P.; Sarkar, M.; Samanta, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108,
9048.
(8) Shim, Y.; Jeong, D.; Manjari, S.; Choi, M. Y.; Kim, H. J Acc. Chem.
Res. 2007, 40, 1130. Jin, H.; Li, X.; Marocelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111,
13473.
(9) Menschutkin, N. Z. Phys. Chem. 1890, 6, 41.
(10) Abbound, J. L. M.; Notario, R.; Bertran, J.; Sola, M. Prog. Phys.
Org. Chem. 1993, 19, 1.
kobs ¼ k2½nucleophileꢀ þ k1
ð3Þ
(13) (a) Wakai, C.; Oleinokova, A.; Ott, M.; Weingartner, H. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2005, 109, 17028. (b) Weingartner, H.; Sasisanker, P.; Daguenet, C.;
Dyson, P. J.; Krossing, I.; Slattery, J. M.; Schubert, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007,
111, 4775. (c) Reichardt, C. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 339. (d) Crowhurst, L.;
Mawdsley, P. R.; Perez-Arlandis, J. M.; Salter, P. A.; Welton, T. Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 2790. Angelini, G.; Chiappe, C.; De Maria, P.; Fontana,
F.; Gasparrini, D.; Pieraccini, D.; Pierini, M.; Siani, G. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
70, 8193. Kamlet, M. J.; Abboud, J.-L. M.; Abraham, M. H.; Taft, R. W.
J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2877.
(11) Castejon, H.; Wiberg, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2139.
(12) Skrzypczak, A.; Neta, P. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2004, 36, 253.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 22, 2009 8523