A R T I C L E S
Nicolaou et al.
Scheme 4. Construction of C9-C15 Vinyl Stannane Fragments 3
and ent-3a
Scheme 5. Construction of C1-C8 Carboxylic Acid Fragments 4
and ent-4a
a Reagents and conditions: (a) Methoxymethyl allyl ether (1.3 equiv),
s-BuLi (1.0 equiv), THF, -78 °C, 30 min; then (-)-Ipc2BOMe (1.0 M in
THF, 1.0 equiv), -78 °C, 1 h; then BF3‚Et2O (1.25 equiv), 19 (1.0 equiv),
-78 f 23 °C, 15 h; (b) K2CO3 (3.0 equiv), MeOH, 23 °C, 7 h, 78% for
the two steps from 19; (c) trichloroacetyl isocyanate (3.0 equiv), CH2Cl2,
23 °C, 1 h; then K2CO3 (3.0 equiv), MeOH, 23 °C, 1 h, 100%; (d) NBS
(1.1 equiv), AgNO3 (0.1 equiv), acetone, 23 °C, 1 h, 90%; (e) Pd(dba)2
(0.05 equiv), PPh3 (0.2 equiv), n-Bu3SnH (2.2 equiv), THF, 23 °C, 1 h,
77%. Ipc ) isopinocampheyl, NBS ) N-bromosuccinimide, DBA )
dibenzylideneacetone.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) m-CPBA (1.3 equiv), NaHCO3 (2.0 equiv),
CH2Cl2, 0 f 23 °C, 2 h, 90%; (b) (R,R)-N,N′-bis(3,5-di-t-butylsalicylidene)-
1,2-cyclohexanediaminato(2-)]cobalt (II) (5 mol %), AcOH (0.01 equiv),
H2O (0.55 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 f 23 °C, 24 h, 25: (43%, >90% ee), 26:
(47%, >90% ee); (c) p-TsCl (1.0 equiv), n-Bu2SnO (0.2 equiv), Et3N (1.0
equiv), CH2Cl2, 23 °C, 2 h, 78%; (d) K2CO3 (1.5 equiv), MeOH/CH2Cl2
(10:1), 0 f 23 °C, 2 h, 82%; (e) Me3S+I- (4.0 equiv), n-BuLi (1.6 M in
THF, 5.8 equiv), THF, -30 f 23 °C, 5 h, 90%; (f) MOMCl (4.0 equiv),
i-Pr2NEt (2.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 f 23 °C, 6 h, 85%; (g) TBAF (1.0 M in
THF, 1.2 equiv), THF, 23 °C, 2 h, 95%; (h) DMP (1.5 equiv), NaHCO3
(5.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, 23 °C, 2 h, 95%; (i) Ph3PdCHCO2Me (1.0 equiv),
CH2Cl2, 23 °C, 16 h, 90%; (j) KOH (5.0 equiv), dioxane/H2O (4:1), 23 °C,
24 h, 85%. m-CPBA ) meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid; p-TsCl ) para-
toluenesulfonyl chloride.
22 [Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, n-Bu3SnH] led to a mixture of regioisomeric
stannanes. In a similar fashion, ent-3 was prepared starting with
19 and employing (+)-Ipc2BOMe as shown in Scheme 4.
Fragments 4 and ent-4 were prepared from the TBS-protected
5-hexene-1-ol (24) through the application of a Jacobsen
hydrolytic kinetic resolution15a as shown in Scheme 5. Thus,
m-CPBA-mediated epoxidation of 24 (90% yield), followed by
exposure of the resulting racemic epoxide to 5 mol % of (R,R)-
N,N′-bis(3,5-di-t-butylsalicylidene)-1,2-cyclohexanediaminato-
(2-)]cobalt(II) (Jacobsen catalyst), acetic acid (0.01 equiv), and
H2O (0.55 equiv) in CH2Cl2 led to the smooth formation of
enantiomerically enriched diol 25 [43% yield, >90% ee by
measurement of its optical rotation and that of later intermediates
ent-26 and ent-27, and Mosher ester 1H NMR (600 MHz)
analysis of ent-27, vide infra] and epoxide 26 [47% yield, >90%
Assembly of Building Blocks and Completion of the Total
Synthesis of the Originally Proposed Structure of Palm-
erolide A. With all of the required building blocks in hand, we
then proceeded to assemble them toward the targeted structure
that was originally proposed for palmerolide A (1). From all of
the possible strategies, we first opted to pursue the one involving
the olefin metathesis18 reaction to construct the macrocycle of
the molecule. To that end, and as is shown in Scheme 6, vinyl
iodide 2 and vinyl stannane 3 were coupled under Stille
conditions19 [Pd(dba)2 catalyst, AsPh3, LiCl] to afford tetraene
33 in 67% yield. Presented with its free hydroxyl group at C19,
the latter compound was esterified with carboxylic acid 4 under
Yamaguchi conditions20 (2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chloride, Et3N,
4-DMAP) furnishing 34 in 61% yield. The same intermediate
34 could be reached from intermediates 2-4 by reversing the
order of their coupling (i.e., 2 + 4; then 3), a sequence that
proceeded through intermediate 35, which gave a higher overall
yield (59% for the two steps). From hexaene ester 34, and on
the basis of what we learned in scouting the road ahead, we
decided at this juncture to follow the sequence depicted in
Scheme 6 toward our final destination. Thus, desilylation of 34
(TBAF, 78% yield) followed by DMP oxidation of the resulting
alcohol (36, 84% yield) led to aldehyde 37, whose Takai iodo-
1
ee by Mosher ester H NMR (600 MHz) analysis of 27, vide
infra].15b The diol was converted to the primary tosylate (TsCl,
n-Bu2SnO, 32, 78% yield),16 and thence to epoxide ent-26 (K2-
CO3, MeOH, 82% yield). Epoxide 26 was reacted with the sulfur
ylide derived from Me3S+I- (n-BuLi)17 to afford hydroxy olefin
27 (90% yield), which was protected as a MOM ether (MOMCl,
i-Pr2NEt, 85% yield) and desilylated (TBAF, 95% yield), leading
to primary alcohol 29 via intermediate 28. Finally, DMP
oxidation of 29 furnished aldehyde 30 (95% yield), whose Wittig
reaction with PPh3dCHCO2Me (90% yield) led, upon saponi-
fication (KOH, 85% yield) to carboxylic acid fragment 4.
Following a similar sequence, epoxide ent-26 was converted to
ent-4 (Scheme 5).
(15) (a) Schaus, S. E.; Brandes, B. D.; Larrow, J. F.; Tokunaga, M.; Hansen,
K. B.; Gould, A. E.; Furrow, M. E.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 1307-1315. (b) Preparation of ent-26 using an identical
procedure has been previously reported: Myers, A.; Lanman, B. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12969-12971.
(16) Martinelli, M. J.; Nayyar, N. K.; Moher, E. D.; Dhokte, U. P.; Pawlak, J.
M.; Vaidyanathan, R. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 447-450.
(17) Alcaraz, L.; Harnett, J. J.; Mioskowski, C.; Martel, J. P.; Le Gall, T.; Shin,
D.-S.; Falck, J. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5449-5452.
(18) (a) Grubbs, R. H. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7117-7140. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.;
Bulger, P. G.; Sarlah, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4490-4527.
(c) Gradillas, A.; Perez-Castells, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6086-
6101.
(19) Yin, L.; Liebscher, J. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 133-173.
(20) Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989-1993.
9
3636 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 11, 2008