desirable. Herein, we report a L-proline catalyzed cascade
reaction as an efficient approach for the synthesis of 4,5-
disubstituted-NH-triazoles.
Our interest in developing new synthetic methods by an
organo catalyst promoted cascade reaction recently led to
the discovery of the successful intermolecular double-
Michael addition between nitro and carbonyl activated
olefins7 as shown in Scheme 1A. The key to this new
amount of NaN3 (2-4 equiv) at 80-90 °C. With the
optimized condition, some NH-triazoles were prepared in
good to excellent yields (54%-96%). However, as pointed
out by the authors, the reaction yields highly depended on
the substrates, and the synthesis of the olefin precursor was
challenging (unfavored equilibrium in the Henry reaction)
and in some cases gave low yields. Therefore, as a general
problem, all the thermal cyclization approaches suffered from
limited substrate scope.
In our recently reported cascade double-Michael addition
between nitroalkene 1a and enone 2, a formal allylic nitro
nucleophile was generated under mild conditions. Moreover,
the attempt on [3 + 2]11 cycloaddition of 1a and electron-
rich alkene 3, forming isoxazole-N-oxide 4, revealed the
formation of 1,3-diene A as activated intermediate. We then
wondered whether N3- could quench the diene intermediate
to produce NH-triazole 6, which would avoid the synthesis
of R-nitroalkene starting material (more complicated 1,2-
disubstituted nitroalkenes) in the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
and significantly increase the reaction substrate scope.
Our initial attempt was to treat 1a and 3 with the addition
of NaN3 to quench intermediate A. However, only isoxazole
4 was obtained with no formation of triazole, even in the
presence of excess NaN3. It suggested that the 1-alkyl diene
A is a highly reactive intermediate, which was fully quenched
Scheme 1
-
by allylic nitro carbanion and not by the N3 . To avoid this
nitro carbanion addition, an alternate approach was designed
by treating nitroalkene 1 with aryl aldehyde 5 to form the
-
1-aryl diene A′ followed by N3 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
to give triazole 6 (Scheme 2B). As expected, the reaction of
methodology was the introduction of a â-alkyl group on the
nitroalkene, which allowed the â-elimination to give the allyl-
ic nitro compounds as the stable product rather than the highly
reactive nitroalkenes. Moreover, we recently discovered that
the treatment of nitroalkene 1 with electron enriched olefins
gave isoxazole-N-oxide as shown in Scheme 1B.8 The poten-
tial applications of functional 1,2,3-triazole derivatives and
the recent discovery of organo catalyst mediated cascade reac-
tions mentioned above initiated our interest in extending this
approach to the synthesis of NH-triazoles through cascade
reactions from simple, readily available starting materials.
Besides the CuAAC approach, another method for the
synthesis of 1,2,3-triazole is the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
between â-nitrostyrene and NaN3, which was first reported
by Zefirov in 1971.9 With DMSO as the solvent at room
temperature, the authors reported the formation of 4-phenyl-
1,2,3-triazole in 65% yield. However, a recent study by
Quiclet-Sire and Zard indicated that this result was not
reproducible.10 Instead, they developed an optimized ap-
proach using an R-substituted nitroalkene and an excess
Scheme 2
nitroalkene 1a, benzylaldehyde, and NaN3 produced the
desired 1,2,3-NH-triazole 6a at room temperature. The
screening of the reaction conditions is summarized in Table
1.
(6) (a) Loren, J. C.; Krasinski, A.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B. Synlett.
2005, 18, 2847-2850. (b) Yap, A. H.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett.
2006, 47, 3035-3038. (c) Shchetnikov, G. T.; Peregudov, A. S.; Osipov,
S. N. Synlett 2007, 136-140. (d) Skarpos, H.; Osipov, S. N.; Vorob’eva,
D. V.; Odinets, I. L.; Lork, E.; Roschenthaler, G. V. Org. Bio. Chem. 2007,
5, 2361-2367.
(7) Sun, X.; Sengupta, S.; Petersen, J. L.; Wang, H.; Lewis, J. P.; Shi,
X. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4495-4498.
(8) Manuscript in preparation.
(11) Selected examples of nitro compound [3+2] reactions: (a) Voituriez,
A.; Moulinas, J.; Kouklovsky, C.; Langlois, Y. Synthesis 2003, 9, 1419-
1426. (b) Roger, P. Y.; Durand, A. C.; Rodriguez, J.; Dulcere, J. P. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 2027-2029. (c) Kunetsky, R. A.; Dilman, A. D.; Struchkova,
M. I.; Belyakov, P. A.; Tartakovsky, V. A.; Ioffe, S. L. Synthesis 2006, 13,
2265-2270. (d) Arrieta, A.; Otaegui, D.; Zubia, A.; Cossio, F. P.; Diaz-
Ortiz, A.; de la Hoz, A.; Herrero, M. A.; Prieto, P.; Foces-Foces, C.; Pizarro,
J. L.; Arriortua, M. I. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4313-4322.
(9) Zefirov, N. S.; Chapovskaya, N. K.; Kolesnikov, V. V. J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 1971, 17, 1001-1002.
(10) Quiclet-Sire, B.; Zard, S. Z. Synthesis 2005, 19, 3319-3326.
1494
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 7, 2008