F. Vitale et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 693 (2008) 1043–1048
1047
1 min. The system reacted at room temperature for 3 h.
Then 50 ml of H2O and 50 ml of CH2Cl2 were added
and the organic phase was separated and dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4. The drying agent and any insoluble
materials were removed by filtration and the solution
was reduced to a solid, in vacuo. The dark brown residue
was resuspended in methanol. The suspension was fil-
tered over celite and subsequently washed with 400 ml
of acetonitrile and 400 ml of hexane to remove any
excess of arenethiolate, TOAB and by-products. The
solid was washed off from the celite with DCM, the sol-
vent was removed in vacuo and the product was dried in
vacuo overnight. The product was highly soluble in
CH2Cl2 and CHCl3.
curve-fitting program for PC. Quantitative evaluation of
the atomic ratios was obtained by analysis of the XPS sig-
nal intensity, employing Scofield’s atomic cross-section
values [19] and experimentally determined sensitivity
factors.
The XRD measurements were performed by using a
high-resolution X-ray diffractometer (HRD3000 Ital Struc-
tures) in parallel beam optical configuration (Max-FluxTM
Optical System). A Copper-target (kCu Ka = 0.154056 nm),
with a X-ray generator setting of 30 mA/40 kV, was
employed as X-ray source (fine focus X-ray tube).
For the structural characterization of the nanoparticles
few drops of the diluted solutions were deposited on pol-
ished (100)-Si surfaces and dried in air. The X-ray diffrac-
tion patterns were recorded in glancing incidence
conditions, i.e. the angle between the incident X-ray beam
and the ‘‘nanoparticle film” surface was kept constant at
x = 1.0°, while the X-ray intensity was measured by 2h-
scans of the detector-system. The average crystallite size
was estimated from the diffraction peak broadening,
pseudo-Voigt function fitting and applying the Scherrer’s
formula.
The samples were studied by HRTEM and diffraction
contrast imaging. All images were recorded with a FEI
TECNAI G2 F30 Supertwin field-emission gun scanning
transmission electron microscope (FEG STEM) operating
at 300 kV and with a point-to-point resolution of
0.205 nm. TEM specimens were prepared by depositing
few drops of the diluted solutions on carbon coated
TEM grids to be directly observed.
4.4. Instrumentation
FTIR spectra were recorded as nujol mulls or as films
deposited from CHCl3 solutions by using CsI cells, on a
Bruker Vertex70 Fourier Transform spectrometer.
1H, 31P NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AC
300P spectrometer at 300 and 121 MHz respectively, in
appropriate solvents (CDCl3); the chemical shifts (ppm)
were referenced to TMS for 1H NMR assigning the
residual 1H impurity signal in the solvent at 7.24 ppm
(CDCl3). 31P NMR chemical shifts are relative to H3PO4
(85%). UV–Vis spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary
100 instrument. UV measurements were performed at
room temperature using quantitative solutions of the com-
pounds in CH2Cl2. UV–Vis spectra were recorded on a
Cary 100 Varian instrument. Photoluminescence spectra
were performed on a Perkin–Elmer LS 50 Fluorescence
Spectrometer. All measurements were performed at room
temperature using quantitative solutions in CHCl3 (1 mg/
ml).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial sup-
port of MIUR (Rome, Italy) and of Regione Puglia (Bari,
Italy) to this research work.
XPS spectra were obtained using a custom designed
spectrometer. A non-monochromatised Mg Ka X-rays
source (1253.6 eV) was used and the pressure in the instru-
ment was maintained at 1 Â 10À9 Torr throughout the
analysis. The experimental apparatus consists of an anal-
ysis chamber and a preparation chamber separated by a
gate valve. An electrostatic hemispherical analyzer (radius
150 mm) operating in the fixed analyzer transmission
(FAT) mode and a 16-channel detector were used. The
film samples were prepared by dissolving our materials
in CHCl3 and spinning the solutions onto polished stain-
less steel substrates. The samples showed good stability
during the XPS analysis, preserving the same spectral fea-
tures and chemical composition. The experimental energy
resolution was 1 eV on the Au 4f7/2 component. The
resolving power DE/E was 0.01. Binding energies (BE)
were corrected by adjusting the position of the C1s peak
to 285.0 eV in those samples containing mainly aliphatic
carbons and to 284.7 eV in those containing more aro-
matic carbon atoms, in agreement with literature data
[18]. The C1s, Pd3d, Pt4f, P2p, Cl2p spectra were decon-
voluted into their individual peaks using the Peak Fit
References
[1] J.C. Love, L.A. Estroff, J.K. Kriebel, R.G. Nuzzo, G.M. Whitesides,
Chem. Rev. 105 (2005) 1103.
[2] M.C. Daniel, D. Astruc, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 293.
[3] M. Brust, M. Walker, D. Betell, D.J. Schriffrin, R. Whyman, J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. (1994) 801.
[4] A.C. Templeton, W.P. Wuelfing, R.W. Murray, Acc. Chem. Res. 33
(2000) 27.
[5] C.N.R. Rao, G.U. Kulkarni, P.J. Thomas, P.P. Edwards, Chem.
Eur. J. 8 (2002) 28.
[6] S.R. Johnson, S.D. Evans, S.W. Mahon, A. Ulman, Langmuir 13
(1997) 51.
[7] R. Shenhar, V.M. Rotello, Acc. Chem. Res. 36 (2003) 549.
[8] S. Chen, R.W. Murray, Langmuir 15 (1999) 682.
[9] R.C. Price, R.L. Whetten, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 13750.
[10] M. Busby, C. Chiorboli, F. Scandola, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006)
6020.
[11] Y.C. Neo, J.J. Vittal, T.S.A. Hor, J. Organomet. Chem. 637–639
(2001) 757.
[12] I. Fratoddi, C. Battocchio, A. La Groia, M.V. Russo, J. Polym. Sci.,
Polym. Chem. 45 (2007) 3311.
[13] W.-Y. Wong, Coord. Chem. Rev. 249 (2005) 971.