F. Manna et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 4632–4635
4635
10. Chou, T. C.; Depew, K. M.; Zheng, Y. H.; Safer, M. L.;
Chan, D.; Helfrich, B.; Zatorska, D.; Zatorski, A.;
Bornmann, W.; Danishefsky, S. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1998, 95, 8369.
better binding affinity to P-glycoprotein than the control
(>100%). The most active derivatives are 2a, e, and s,
which are three (2s) or four times (2a and e) more potent
than Quercetin. Considering the data in Figure 1 of this
preliminary study, the following point on the structure–
activity relationship needs to be highlighted. The highest
affinity to P-gp was observed with compounds 2a and e,
where ring A remains unsubstituted, and which appears
to be the most important prerequisite for affinity when
comparing with other compounds. The presence of an
R0 substituent, such as hydrogen or 2-OCH3 group, in
ring B also appears to be an important factor. In fact,
when R = H in ring A, the presence of a methyl group
and of a 3- or 4-OCH3 group in R0 gives compounds
with no (2b–d, g) or non-significant affinity (2f). The
only exception was that observed with compound 2s,
which bears 2,4-OH in ring A and a 2-OCH3 group in
ring B, and whose affinity to P-gp is one time lower than
those of 2a and e. All compounds with a 4-OH or 2,4-
OH in ring A (2h–n) showed no or very weak affinity
to P-gp, except for the above-mentioned compound 2s.
11. Manna, F.; Chimenti, F.; Bolasco, A.; Secci, D.; Bizzarri,
´
B.; Befani, O.; Turini, P.; Mondovı, B.; Alcaro, S.; Tafi, A.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 3629.
12. Chimenti, F.; Secci, D.; Bolasco, A.; Chimenti, P.;
Granese, A.; Befani, O.; Turini, P.; Alcaro, S.; Ortuso,
F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 3697.
13. Rostom, S. A. F.; Shalaby, M. A.; El Demellawy, M. A.
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 38, 959.
14. (a) A solution of chalcones 1a–u (0.03 mol) in 30 mL of
acetic acid was added dropwise to a solution of hydrazine
hydrate (0.06 mol) in 10 mL absolute ethanol and stirred
with refluxing for 24 h. The mixture was then poured into
ice to obtain the crude products 2a–u, which were
crystallized from ethanol; (b) Barium hydroxide octahy-
drate (0.03 mol) was added to a solution of the appropri-
ate acetophenone (0.03 mol) and the appropriate aryl
aldehyde (0.03 mol) in 96% ethanol. The suspension was
stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction
mixture was then poured into ice and extracted with
chloroform after neutralization. The organic layer was
washed with water (3· 20 mL), dried (Na2SO4), and
concentrated in vacuo to obtain the crude product.
Chalcones 1a–g were crystallized from methanol; (c) A
solution of 3,4-dihydro-a-pyran in methylene chloride
(30 mL) was added dropwise to a suspension of suitable
acetophenone (0.03 mol) and pyridinium p-toluene sulfo-
nate (PPTS) (0.015 mol) in methylene chloride (20 mL),
and stirred at room temperature for one night. The
reaction mixture was then poured into ice and extracted
with chloroform (4· 20 mL). The organic layer was
washed with water (3· 20 mL), dried (Na2SO4), and
concentrated in vacuo to obtain the protected acetophe-
none. Barium hydroxide octahydrate (0.03 mol) was
added to a solution of 4-hydroxy-4-(tetrahydropyran-2-
yloxy) acetophenone (0.03 mol) or 2,4-dihydroxy-4-(tetra-
hydropyran-2yloxy)acetophenone (0.03 mol) and appro-
priate benzaldehyde (0.03 mol) in dry ethanol and stirred
for 24 h at 30 ꢁC. The reaction mixture was then poured
into ice and extracted with chloroform after neutraliza-
tion. The organic layer was washed with water (3· 20 mL),
dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated in vacuo to obtain the
crude 4-hydroxy-4-(tetrahydropyran-2-yloxy) chalcone or
2,4-dihydroxy-4-(tetrahydropyran-2-yloxy) chalcone. The
crude products were suspended in ethanol and HCl 3 N
(15 mL) was added. The reaction suspension was stirred
for one night at room temperature, then poured into ice,
neutralized with Na2CO3, and extracted with chloroform
(3· 30 mL). The organic layer was dried over sodium
sulfate and evaporated in vacuo to give the crude product.
Chalcones 1h–u were crystallized from methanol.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by a grant from MURST 60%.
We also acknowledge Mr. Anton Gerada, a professional
translator, Fellow of the Institute of Translation and
Interpreting of London and Member of AIIC (Associa-
ˆ
tion Internationale des Interpretes de Conferences—
Geneva) for revising the manuscript.
´
References and notes
1. Dimmock, J. R.; Elias, D. W.; Beazely, M. A.; Kandepu,
N. M. Curr. Med. Chem. 1999, 6, 1125.
2. De Vincenzo, R.; Scambia, G.; Benedetti Panici, P.;
Ranelletti, F. O.; Bonanno, G.; Ercoli, A.; Delle Monache,
F.; Ferrari, F.; Piantelli, M.; Mancuso, S. Anticancer Drug
Des. 1995, 10, 481.
3. Calliste, C. A.; Le Bail, J. C.; Trouillas, P.; Pouget, C.;
Habrioux, G.; Chulia, A. J.; Duroux, J. L. Anticancer Res.
2001, 21, 3949.
4. Dimmock, J. R.; Jha, A.; Zello, G. A.; Allen, T. M.;
Santos, C. L.; Balzarini, J.; De Clercq, E.; Manvathu, E.
K.; Stables, J. P. Pharmazie 2003, 4, 227.
5. Gottesman, M. M.; Pastan, I. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1993,
62, 385.
6. Mitscher, L. A.; Pillai, S. P.; Gentry, E. J.; Shannkel, D.
M. Med. Res. Rev. 1999, 477.
15. Motulsky, H. J.; Ransnas, L. A. Faseb J. 1987, 1, 365.
16. Lee, J. S.; Paull, K.; Alvarez, M.; Hose, C.; Monks, A.;
Grever, M.; Fojo, A. T.; Bates, S. E. Mol. Pharmacol.
1994, 46, 627.
7. Kolaczkowski, M.; Kolaczkowska, A.; Luczynski, J.;
Witek, S.; Goffeau, A. Microb. Drug Resist. 1998, 4, 143.
8. Gros, P.; Buschman, E. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1993, 137, 169.
9. Ford, J. M.; Hait, W. N. Pharmacol. Rev. 1990, 42, 155.