C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Binding and Growth Inhibitory Data
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Bryostatin Analogue 1a
ID
PKC Ki (nM)
K562 (nM)d
MV411 (nM)d
a
1
2
3
4
2.3 ( 0.6
4 ( 1
0.47 ( 0.09
15 ( 2
1.4 ( 0.7
0.17 ( 0.05
0.4 ( 0.2
1.4 ( 0.3
1.63 ( 0.08
b
2.5 ( 0.1
a
0.9 ( 0.2
a,c
3.1 ( 0.3
a Average of two experiments. b Average of four experiments. c See
Supporting Information for discussion. d EC50 values are an average of
three experiments. All error bars indicate standard error of the mean.
Acknowledgment. Support of this work provided by the NIH
(CA31845) is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank Professor
Daria Mochly-Rosen for access to assay materials.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
spectral data, and assay protocol. This material is available free of
References
(1) (a) Wender, P. A.; Baryza, J. L.; Hilinski, M. K.; Horan, J. C.; Kan, C.;
Verma, V. A. Beyond Natural Products: Synthetic Analogues of Bryostatin
1. In Drug DiscoVery Research: New Frontiers in the Post-Genomic Era;
Huang, Z., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Hoboken, NJ, 2007; pp 127-162. (b) Hale,
K. J.; Hummersone, M. G.; Manaviazar, S.; Frigerio, M. Nat. Prod. Rep.
2002, 19, 413–453.
(2) (a) For an important combination trial, see: Dowlati, A.; Lazarus, H. M.;
Hartman, P.; Jacobberger, J. W.; Whitacre, C.; Gerson, S. L.; Ksenich, P.;
Cooper, B. W.; Frisa, P. S.; Gottlieb, M.; Murgo, A. J.; Remick, S. C.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 5929–5935. (b) For a review of clinical
performance, see: Kortmansky, J.; Schwartz, G. K. Cancer InVest. 2003,
(3) Hongpaisan, J.; Alkon, D. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104,
19571–19576.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) TES-Cl, imidazole, CH2Cl2, rt, 97%; (b) (i)
CeCl3, TMSCH2MgCl, THF, -78 °C f rt, 12 h, (ii) SiO2, CH2Cl2, rt, 69%;
(c) Li0, naphthalene, THF, -25 °C, 93%; (d) TPAP (10 mol %), NMO (3
equiv), powdered 4Å MS, CH2Cl2, rt; (e) NaClO2, NaH2PO4, 2-methyl-2-butene,
2:1 t-BuOH:H2O, 0 °C, 89% from 8; (f) 9, 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chloride,
Et3N, toluene, then 10, DMAP, rt; (g) PPTS (30 mol %), 1:4 H2O:THF, rt,
71% from 9; (h) TMS-OTf, Et2O, -78 f 0 °C, 93%; (i) HF•py, THF, rt, 77%.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Bryostatin Analogues 2 and 3a
(4) Etcheberrigaray, R.; Tan, M.; Dewachter, I.; Kuiperi, C.; Van der Auwera, I.;
Wera, S.; Qiao, L.; Bank, B.; Nelson, T. J.; Kozikowski, A. P.; Van Leuven,
F.; Alkon, D. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 11141–11146.
(5) Dempsey, E. C.; Newton, A. C.; Mochly-Rosen, D.; Fields, A. P.; Reyland,
M. E.; Insel, P. A.; Messing, R. O. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.
2000, 279, L429–L438.
(6) Kazanietz, M. G. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002, 61, 759–767.
(7) (a) Bryostatin 7: Kageyama, M.; Tamura, T.; Nantz, M. H.; Roberts, J. C.;
Somfai, P.; Whritenour, D. C.; Masamune, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 7407–7408. (b) Formal syntheses of bryo 7: Manaviazar, S.; Frigerio,
M.; Bhatia, G. S.; Hummersone, M. G.; Aliev, A. E.; Hale, K. J. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 4477–4480. (c) Bryostatin 2: Evans, D. A.; Carter, P. H.;
Carreira, E. M.; Charrette, A. B.; Prunet, J. A.; Lautens, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 7540–7552. (d) Bryostatin 3: Ohmori, K.; Ogawa, Y.;
Obitsu, T.; Ishikawa, Y.; Nishiyama, S.; Yamamura, S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2290–2294.
(8) For a promising biosynthetic approach, see: (a) Sudek, S.; Lopanik, N. B.;
Waggoner, L. E.; Hildebrand, M.; Anderson, C.; Liu, H.; Patel, A.; Sherman,
D. H.; Haygood, M. G. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 67–74.
(9) Wender, P. A.; Baryza, J. L.; Bennett, C. E.; Bi, F. C.; Brenner, S. E.;
Clarke, M. O.; Horan, J. C.; Kan, C.; Lacote, E.; Lippa, B.; Nell, P. G.;
Turner, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13648–13649.
(10) For an impressive intermolecular Prins approach to the bryopyran core,
see: Keck, G. E.; Truong, A. P. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2153–2156.
(11) (a) Schulte-Elte, K. H.; Hauser, A.; Ohloff, G. HelV. Chim. Acta 1979, 62,
2673–2680. (b) Custar, D. W.; Zabawa, T. P.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 804–805. (c) Woo, S. K.; Kwon, M. S.; Lee, E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, in press.
(12) All bryostatin syntheses require g14 operations after their respective A-,
B-, and C-ring fragments have been conjoined. See ref 7.
(13) For an example of this issue, see: Trost, B. M.; Yang, H.; Thiel, O. R.;
Frontier, A. J.; Brindle, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2206–2207.
(14) Wender, P. A.; Mayweg, A. V. W.; VanDeusen, C. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
277–279.
(15) Narayanan, B. A.; Bunnelle, W. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 6261–6264.
(16) Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989–1993.
(17) (a) Mekhalfia, A.; Marko, I. E.; Adams, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
4783–4786. (b) For the formation of 2,6-disubstituted pyrans: Keck, G. E.;
Covel, J. A.; Schiff, T.; Yu, T. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1189–1192.
(18) Alternatively, a 1:3 E:Z selectivity is obtained with the sodium salt of a
(R)-BINOL-derived phosphonate ester: Tanaka, K.; Ohta, Y.; Fuji, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 4071–4074.
(19) Wender, P. A.; Cribbs, C. M.; Koehler, K. F.; Sharkey, N. A.; Herald,
C. L.; Kamano, Y.; Pettit, G. R.; Blumberg, P. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1988, 85, 7197–7201.
JA8015632
a Reagents and conditions: (a) O3, CH2Cl2, -78 °C, then thiourea, CH2Cl2:
MeOH, rt, 88%; (b) trimethyl phosphonoacetate, NaHMDS, THF, 0 °C, 87%
combined yield, 1:1.05 E:Z; (c) HF•py, THF, rt, 83% combined yield, 32%
isolated 2, 37% isolated 3.
combined yield.18 This mixture was desilylated using HF•pyridine to
reveal the C13-enoate analogues 2 and 3 in 32 and 37% yield,
respectively.
In accord with our pharmacophoric hypothesis,19 analogues 1, 2,
and 3 were found to be potent ligands for PKC, with Ki values of 1.6,
2.5, and 0.9 nM, respectively. Given these potent Ki values, we were
motivated to test the antileukemic activity of analogues 1-3 in vitro.
Significantly, these compounds exhibit nanomolar and subnanomolar
EC50 values for growth inhibition of K562 human erythroleukemia
cells and MV411 B-myelomonocytic leukemia cells (Table 1).
In summary, the first members of a new class of potent bryostatin
analogues containing the complete bryostatin oxycarbocyclic ring
system have been synthesized using a novel Prins-driven macrocy-
clization. Given the remarkable functional group tolerance and
efficiency of this process, it is an attractive strategy for the convergent
synthesis of tetrahydropyran containing targets. Significantly, initial
in vitro assays indicate that these analogues are our most active
compounds made to date, exceeding the antiproliferative activity of
our most potent dioxane analogue 4 by up to 2 orders of magnitude.
Further studies on these promising leads will be reported in due course.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 21, 2008 6659