both thermodynamic and kinetic conditions are readily
applicable to spiroacetalization of endocyclic enol ethers,
making them versatile precursors for the synthesis of
spiroacetals. However, limited methods are currently avail-
able for the synthesis of endocyclic enol ethers; the classical
approaches usually involve electrophilic trapping of 2-lithio
dihydropyrans, which often suffer from a narrow substrate
scope due to the use of strong bases.3,4 We describe herein
an efficient strategy for the synthesis of endocyclic enol
ethers based on a Suzuki-Miyaura coupling/ring-closing
metathesis (RCM) sequence, and its application to the
synthesis of a variety of spiroacetals, including cytotoxic
marine metabolites attenols A and B.
Table 1. Synthesis of Endocyclic Enol Ethers Based on a
Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling/RCM Sequencea
We envisioned that endocyclic enol ether 3 could be
synthesized from enol phosphate 5 and alkylborane 6 Via 4
based on a Suzuki-Miyaura coupling/RCM sequence (Scheme
1).5–8 In this way, spiroacetals can be rapidly elaborated from
readily available acyclic precursors. This strategy is espe-
cially useful when the corresponding lactone-derived enol
phosphate is not accessible or does not couple efficiently. A
prerequisite for the success of our strategy was that the
intermolecular Suzuki-Miyaura coupling of 5 and 6 must
be more favored than the possible intramolecular Heck
cyclization of 5, although we previously showed that
R-nitrogen-substituted alkenyl phosphates readily undergo
an intramolecular Heck cyclization.7c We therefore examined
the coupling of enol phosphates 7-9 with alkylboranes
generated from the corresponding olefins 10-13 using
Pd(PPh3)4 as a catalyst and aqueous Cs2CO3 as a base in
DMF at 50 °C (Table 1). Subsequent RCM was ac-
complished by exposure of the resultant enol ethers to
Grubbs’ second-generation catalyst9 in toluene (5 mM),
affording a variety of endocyclic enol ethers 14-19 in good
overall yields. These results clearly indicate that intermo-
lecular Suzuki-Miyaura coupling predominated over the
possible intramolecular Heck cyclization.
a Cross-coupling: 10-13 (1.5 equiv), 9-BBN-H (2.6 equiv), THF, rt;
then aq Cs2CO3 (3 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (0.1 equiv), 7-9 (prepared from 1
equiv of the corresponding acetate), DMF, 50 °C. RCM: Grubbs’ second
generation catalyst (0.1 equiv), toluene, 70 °C. The yields are overall from
the respective acetates. b About 10:1 mixture of diastereomers at C4.
Spirocyclization of endocyclic enol ethers 14-19 under
thermodynamic conditions was then examined (Table 2).
After desilylation (TBAF, 81-100%), the resultant alcohol
was exposed to CSA in CH2Cl2 at room temperature for 2 h.
In the case of 14-16, the doubly anomeric isomers 20-22
were exclusively formed in high yields.10 The cyclization
of 17 after desilylation produced a mixture of nonanomeric
spiroacetals 23a,b due to the presence of an unfavorable
steric interaction within the corresponding doubly anomeric
isomer.10 In the case of 18 and 19, the yields of the doubly
anomeric spiroacetals 24 and 25 were poor because of the
competitive Ferrier cyclization (see Supporting Informa-
tion).10 These results indicate that the stereochemistry of the
C4 benzyloxy group strongly influences the course of
cyclization.
We next examined kinetically controlled iodospirocycliza-
tion of 17-19. Thus, treatment of 17, after desilylation, with
NIS in CH2Cl2 at -90 °C4b gave an inseparable 1:3 mixture
of 26a and 26b in 98% yield. In contrast, iodo-spirocycliza-
tion of 18 was highly stereoselective and high-yielding;
doubly anomeric spiroacetal 27 was isolated as a single
stereoisomer in 83% yield.10 In contrast, iodo-spirocycliza-
(3) For examples: (a) Danishefsky, S. J.; Pearson, W. H. J. Org. Chem.
1983, 48, 3865. (b) Ley, S. V.; Lygo, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 113.
(c) Kocienski, P.; Yeates, C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 1879.
(d) Boeckman, R. K., Jr.; Charette, A. B.; Asberom, T.; Johnston, B. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 7553. (e) Dubois, E.; Beau, J.-M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1990, 31, 5165. (f) Friesen, R. W.; Sturino, C. F. J. Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 5808. (g) Crimmins, M. T.; O’Mahony, R. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
5894. (h) Elsley, D. A.; MacLeod, D.; Miller, J. A.; Quayle, P.; Davies,
G. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 409.
(4) (a) Pothier, N.; Goldstein, S.; Deslongchamps, P. HelV. Chim. Acta
1992, 75, 604. (b) Holson, E. B.; Roush, W. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3719.
(c) Potuzak, J. S.; Moilanen, S. B.; Tan, D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 13796. (d) Moilanen, S. B.; Potuzak, J. S.; Tan, D. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 1792.
(5) For a review of Suzuki-Miyaura coupling: Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A.
Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2457
(6) For a review of olefin metathesis: Nicolaou, K. C.; Bulger, P. G.;
Sarlah, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4490
.
.
(7) For our successful application of palladium-catalyzed reactions of
enol phosphates, see: (a) Sasaki, M.; Fuwa, H.; Ishikawa, M.; Tachibana,
K. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1075. (b) Fuwa, H.; Sasaki, M. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2007, 5, 1849. (c) Fuwa, H.; Sasaki, M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2876. (d)
Fuwa, H.; Sasaki, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3347
.
(8) Other examples of the synthesis of endocyclic enol ethers employing
RCM: (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Postema, M. H. D.; Claiborne, C. F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1565. (b) Rainier, J. D.; Allwein, S. P. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 5310. (c) Calimente, D.; Postema, M. H. D. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 1770. (d) Clark, J. S.; Kimber, M. C.; Robertson, J.; McErlean, C. S. P.;
Wilson, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6157
(9) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
953.
.
(10) For stereochemical assignments of the synthesized spiroacetals, see
the Supporting Information.
2550
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 12, 2008