LETTER
Synthesis of Hantzsch Esters and Polyhydroquinoline Derivatives
885
Using the optimized reaction conditions,9 we synthesized
a number of polyhydroquinoline derivatives and the re-
sults are shown in Table 3.
(5) (a) Love, B.; Sander, K. M. J. Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 1914.
(b) Hantzsch, A. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1888, 21, 942.
(6) (a) Chari, M. A.; Syamasundar, K. Catal. Commun. 2005, 6,
624. (b) Gordeev, M. F.; Patel, D. V.; Gordon, E. M. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 924. (c) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.;
Basak, A. K.; Narasaiah, A. V. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 3.
(d) Maquestiau, A.; Maeyence, A.; Eynde, J. J. V.
The results of Table 3 clearly indicate the feasibility of
four-component unsymmetrical Hantzsch reaction in
aqueous micelles. The products were synthesized in ex-
cellent yield under ultrasonic irradiation. The method has
the ability to tolerate a variety of functional groups such
as hydroxy, chloro, nitro, methoxy, and unsaturation. We
observed that in the case of acetylacetone the reaction
took a longer time to complete and the isolated yields
were somewhat lower than corresponding acetoacetic es-
ter.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 3839. (e) Ohberg, L.; Westman,
J. Synlett 2001, 1296. (f) Anniyappan, M.; Muralidharan,
D.; Perumal, P. T. Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 659.
(7) (a) Ko, S.; Yao, C.-F. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 7293.
(b) Heravi, M. M.; Bakhtiari, K.; Javadi, N. M.;
Bamoharram, F. F.; Saeedi, M.; Oskooie, H. A. J. Mol.
Catal. A.: Chem. 2007, 264, 50. (c) Kumar, A.; Maurya, R.
A. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 1946. (d) Wang, L.-M.; Sheng, J.;
Zhang, L.; Han, J.-W.; Fan, Z.-Y.; Tian, H.; Qian, C.-T.
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 1539.
In conclusion, we have developed an efficient and versa-
tile method for the synthesis of symmetrical and unsym-
metrical Hantzsch esters. The reaction is catalyzed by
PTSA and has been carried out under ultrasonic irradia-
tion at room temperature. The process has several advan-
tages from economical and environmental points of view
such as short reaction time, high yields, and mild reaction
conditions.
(8) Typical Experimental Procedure for the Synthesis of 1,4-
Dihydropyridine Derivatives
In a 25 mL round-bottomed flask, benzaldehyde (1 mmol),
ethyl acetoacetate (2 mmol), NH4OAc (1 mmol), and PTSA
(0.1 mmol) was added. To this an aqueous solution of SDS
(3 mL, 0.1 M) was added. The reaction mixture was
immersed in an ultrasonic bath and irradiated for 1 h. Then,
the reaction mixture was diluted with brine and extracted
with EtOAc. The organic layer was dried over anhyd
Na2SO4 and concentrated to give a crude product. The pure
product was obtained by crystallization of the crude material
from MeOH; mp 158 °C. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): d =
1.21 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 6 H), 2.29 (s, 6 H), 4.08 (q, J = 7.7 Hz, 4
H), 4.98 (s, 1 H), 6.00 (s, 1 H), 7.01–7.26 (m, 5 H). IR (KBr):
3322, 1676, 1633 cm–1. MS: m/z = 330 [M + H]+. Anal.
Calcd for C19H23NO4: C, 69.28, H, 7.04, N, 4.25. Found: C,
69.12, H, 6.98, N, 4.14.
Acknowledgment
R.A.M. is thankful to CSIR, New Delhi for the award of a senior re-
search fellowship. The authors also acknowledge SAIF-CDRI for
providing the spectroscopic and analytical data.
References and Notes
(9) Typical Experimental Procedure for the Synthesis of
Polyhydroquinoline Derivatives
(1) (a) Bossert, F.; Meyer, H.; Wehinger, E. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1981, 20, 762. (b) Nakayama, H.; Kosoaka, Y.
Heterocycles 1996, 42, 901. (c) Godfraid, T.; Miller, R.;
Wibo, M. Pharmacol. Rev. 1986, 38, 321. (d) Mannhold,
R.; Jablonka, B.; Voigdt, W.; Schoenafinger, K.; Schravan,
K. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 229.
(2) (a) Buhler, F. R.; Kiowski, W. J. Hypertens. 1987, 5, S3.
(b) Reid, G. L.; Meredith, P. A.; Pasanisi, F. J. Cardiovasc.
Pharmacol. 1985, 7, S18.
(3) (a) Sausins, A.; Duburs, G. Heterocycles 1988, 27, 279.
(b) Mager, P. P.; Coburan, R. A.; Solo, A. J.; Trigle, D. J.;
Rothe, H. Drug Des. Discovery 1992, 8, 273. (c) Clusa, V.
Drugs Future 1995, 20, 135. (d) Boer, R.; Gekeler, V.
Drugs Future 1995, 20, 499.
(4) (a) Ruppert, R.; Jeandon, C.; Sgambati, A.; Callot, H. J.
Chem. Commun. 1999, 2123. (b) Menche, D.; Hassfeld, J.;
Li, J.; Menche, G.; Ritter, A.; Rudolph, S. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 741. (c) Garden, S. J.; Guimarães, C. R. W.; Corréa, M.
B.; Oleveira, C. A. F. D.; Pinto, A. D. C.; Alencastro, R. B.
D. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8815. (d) Quellet, S. G.; Tuttle,
J. B.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 32.
(e) Martin, N. J. A.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
13368.
In a 25 mL round-bottomed flask, dimedone (1 mmol),
benzaldehyde (1 mmol), ethyl acetoacetate (1 mmol),
NH4OAc (1 mmol), and PTSA (0.1 mmol) was added. To
this an aqueous solution of SDS (3 mL, 0.1 M) was added.
The reaction mixture was immersed in an ultrasonic bath and
irradiated until reaction was complete (TLC monitoring, 1–
3 h). The reaction mixture was diluted with brine and
extracted with EtOAc. The organic layer was dried over
anhyd Na2SO4 and concentrated to give a crude product. The
pure product was obtained by crystallization from MeOH;
mp 203–204 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 0.94 (s, 3
H), 1.07 (s, 3 H), 1.21 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H), 2.13–2.29 (m, 4
H), 2.35 (s, 3 H), 4.06 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 5.07 (s, 1 H), 6.64
(s, 1 H), 7.08–7.13 (m, 1 H), 7.18–7.23 (m, 2 H), 7.28–7.33
(m, 2 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d = 12.92, 17.96,
25.84, 28.15, 31.38, 35.33, 39.65, 49.50, 58.52, 104.72,
110.70, 124.74, 126.59, 126.72, 142.41, 145.82, 147.47,
166.24, 194.43. IR (KBr): 3287, 3078, 2963, 1697, 1611
cm–1. MS: m/z = 340 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd for C21H25NO3:
C, 74.31, H, 7.42, N, 4.13. Found: C, 74.27, H, 7.39, N, 4.08.
Synlett 2008, No. 6, 883–885 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York