reaction of arylboronic acids with 3-substituted maleimides
and 2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone7 were described. In both
these reports, excellent yields and selectivities were obtained
on cyclic, trisubstituted olefins.
In this paper, we describe a general approach to the
asymmetric construction of carboxylic acid derivatives
having an all-carbon R-quaternary center via copper-
catalyzed conjugate addition of dialkylzinc reagents to 2-(2,2-
dimethyl-4,6-dioxo-1,3-dioxan-5-ylidene)aryl acetates (1). As
depicted in Scheme 1, the proposed general strategy relies
Table 1. Survey of Phosphoramidites Ligands 3 on the Addition
of Et2Zn to Alkene 1a
entry
Ar
X
ligand
R
yield (%) er (S:R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
C6H5 MeO (1a)
C6H5 MeO (1a)
C6H5 MeO (1a)
C6H5 MeO (1a)
C6H5 MeO (1a)
C6H5 MeO (1a)
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
Et (2a)
Et (2a)
Et (2a)
Et (2a)
Et (2a)
Et (2a)
quant
quant
quant
85
85
85
94:6
95:5
96:4
94:6
85:15
42:58
chiral amine moiety was crucial for optimal selectivity; using
3e, 2a was obtained in a moderate 85:15 er (entry 5).
Furthermore, the binaphthyl moiety was necessary to achieve
high enantioselectivity as the biphenol based ligand 3f led
to a poor er (entry 6). On the basis of these results, 3a was
selected as the optimal ligand and used throughout this study.
Scheme 1. General Strategy
on the highly activated nature of these Michael acceptors to
induce umpolung of the position R to the non-Meldrum’s
acid carbonyl, and allow this center to act as an electrophile
toward organozinc reagents.
Readily prepared8 olefin 1a was subjected to 2 equiv of
Et2Zn, 10 mol % of phosphoramidite ligand 3a,9 and 5 mol
% of Cu(OTf)2 in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME); 2a was
isolated as a single regioisomer in quantitative yield and an
enantiomeric ratio of 94:6 (Table 1, entry 1). This result was
gratifying as it represents the first example of enantioselective
1,4-addition to electrophilic sp2-carbon centers flanked by
two sp2-hybridized carbons. In attempts to achieve higher
selectivities, phosphoramidites 3b-f were prepared (Figure
1).10 It was found that the replacement of the phenyl group
on 3a with 2-naphthyl or cyclohexyl had little effect (entries
2 and 3). Similarly, analogous ethyl-substituted ligand 3d
furnished identical er as 3a (entry 4). On the other hand, the
Figure 1. Phosphoramidite ligands 3a-f.
We then set out to define the scope of the methodology by
modifying the ester and aromatic moieties of 1 (Table 2). It
was shown that the nature of the ester had modest influence on
the enantioselectivity of the reaction (entries 1-6). Keeping
the ester moiety constant (X ) OMe), substitution at the para
and meta positions of the phenyl ring was determined to have
negligible influence on the enantioselectivity of the addition,
regardless of the substituent steric demand and electronic nature,
with er being highest in the para-substituted examples (entries
7-11 vs 12-14). Ortho substituents led to inconsistent results,
as competing, racemic conjugate reduction occurred (2, R )
H) and er fluctuated with the nature of the substituent (entries
15-18).11 Furyl and naphthyl substrates 1s and 1t provided
product 2s and 2t, respectively, in good yield and selectivity
(entries 19 and 20).
(4) For synthesis of all-carbon quaternary centers via 1,4-addition to
3-substituted cyclic enones, see: (a) Palais, L.; Mikhel, I. S.; Bournaud, C.;
Micouin, L.; Falciola, C. A.; Vuagnoux-d’Augustin, M.; Rosset, S.;
Bernardinelli, G.; Alexakis, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7462–
7465. (b) Vuagnoux-d’Augustin, M.; Kehrli, S.; Alexakis, A. Synlett 2007,
2057–2060. (c) Vuagnoux-d’Augustin, M.; Alexakis, A. Chem. Eur. J. 2007,
13, 9647–9662. (d) Martin, D.; Kehrli, S.; d’Augustin, M.; Clavier, H.;
Mauduit, M.; Alexakis, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8416–8417. (e)
Lee, K.; Brown, M. K.; Hird, A. W.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 7182–7184. (f) Fuchs, N.; d’Augustin, M.; Humam, M.; Alexakis,
A.; Taras, R.; Gladiali, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 3143–3146.
(g) Hird, A. W.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14988–
14989. (h) d’Augustin, M.; Palais, L.; Alexakis, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 1376–1378. For 1,4-addition to 2,2-disubstituted nitroolefins, see:
(i) Wu, J.; Mampreian, D. M.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 4584–4585. For 1,4-addition to ꢀ,ꢀ-disubstituted R,ꢀ-unsaturated
pyridylsulfones, see: (j) Mauleo´n, P.; Carretero, J. C. Chem. Commun. 2005,
4961–4963.
(9) (a) Feringa, B. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 346–353. (b) Feringa,
B. L.; Pineschi, M.; Arnold, L. A.; Imbos, R.; de Vries, A. H. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2620–2623.
(5) (a) Fillion, E.; Wilsily, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2774–2775.
(b) Fillion, E.; Wilsily, A.; Liao, E.-T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17,
2957–2959.
(10) (a) Li, K.; Alexakis, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8019–8022.
(b) Watanabe, T.; Kno¨pfel, T. F.; Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4557–
4558. (c) Alexakis, A.; Rosset, S.; Allamand, J.; March, S.; Guillet, F.;
Benhaim, C. Synlett 2001, 1375–1378. (d) Arnold, L. A.; Imbos, R.;
Mandoli, A.; de Vries, A. H. M.; Naasz, R.; Feringa, B. L. Tetrahedron
2000, 56, 2865–2878. (e) Hulst, R.; de Vries, N. K.; Feringa, B. L.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 699–708.
(6) Brown, M. K.; May, T. L.; Baxter, C. A.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1097–1100.
(7) Shintani, R.; Duan, W.-L.; Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 5628–5629.
(8) Knoevenagel condensation of arylglyoxylates with Meldrum’s acid, see:
(a) Baxter, G. J.; Brown, R. F. C. Aust. J. Chem. 1975, 28, 1551–1557.
2802
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 13, 2008