S5, ESIw displaꢀy the optimised structure and the selected spin
densities of 32( +). In this model, the spins are mainly dis-
tributed to the two diagonal nitrogens (N1 and N3) and four
phenyl rings (ring A, B, C and D), and the separation distance
of 6.91 A between N1 and N3 is close to the calculaꢀted
distance of 7.4 A between two radical centres of 22( +)
mentioned abꢀove. Interestingly, the other nitrogen atoms N2
and N4 of 22( +) retain almost no spin density, implying that
This paper is dedicated to Professor Yoshiteru Sakata on
the occasion of his 70th birthday. This work was supported by
the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) No.19550037 (to
H. T.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology, Japan. We are much indebted to
Dr Masayasu Taki of Graduate School of Human and En-
vironmental Studies, Kyoto University for his help in the
electrochemical measurements. We wish to express our grati-
tude to Mr Takayuki Suzuki of Japan Electron Optics La-
boratory Co., Ltd. (JEOL) for his help in the attempted
ENDOR measurements.
dication radical 22( +) can be viewed as a cyclic array of two
ꢀ
diphenylamine-type cation radicals10 connected with nitrogen
atoms N2 and N4.
To further explore whether the observed triplet state of
22( +) was a ground or thermally excited state, variable-
ꢀ
Notes and references
temperature EPR experiments were performed in the range
of 4.5 to 100 K. As shown in Fig. S10 (ESIw) the signal
intensity for the forbidden transition (DMs = ꢃ2) increased
with the decrease in temperature, indicating that dication
z Chemical oxidation of 2 (1 mM) with 0.9 equiv. of phenyliodine(III)
bis(trifluoroacetate)9 in CH2Cl2 afforded the identical EPR spectrum
with that of Fig. 2(a).
1. (a) C. D. Gutsche, Calixarenes Revisited, ed. J. F. Stoddart, Royal
Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1998; (b) Calixarenes 2001, ed.
Z Asfari, V Bohmer, J Harrowfield, J Vicens and M Saadioui,
¨
radical 22( +) existed either in a triplet ground state or in a
ꢀ
degenerate state of triplet and singlet states. In a DFT
ꢀ
calculation, the model compound 32( +) favors a triplet
Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001.
2. (a) H. Iwamura, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 1990, 26, 179;
(b) D. A. Dougherty, Acc. Chem. Res., 1991, 24, 88;
(c) H. Iwamura and N. Koga, Acc. Chem. Res., 1993, 26, 346;
(d) A. Rajca, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 871; (e) A. Rajca, Adv. Phys.
Org. Chem., 2005, 40, 153.
3. (a) K. Matsuda, N. Nakamura, K. Takahashi, K. Inoue, N. Koga
and H. Iwamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 5550; (b) S. Rajca,
A. Rajca, J. Wongsriratanakul, P. Butler and S.-M. Choi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 6972, and references therein.
4. A. R. Forrester, Organic Chemistry of Stable Free Radicals,
Academic Press, New York, 1968.
5. A. Ito, Y. Ono and K. Tanaka, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64,
8236.
6. (a) H. Tsue, K. Ishibashi, H. Takahashi and R. Tamura, Org.
Lett., 2005, 7, 2165; (b) H. Tsue, K. Ishibashi, S. Tokita,
K. Matsui, H. Takahashi and R. Tamura, Chem. Lett., 2007,
36, 1374; (c) H. Tsue, K. Ishibashi and R. Tamura, in Heterocyclic
ground state over a singlet state by an energy gap (DESꢁT
)
of ꢀ10.0 kcal molꢁ1, demonstrating that the dication radical
22( +) exists in a triplet ꢀground state. The observed ferromag-
netic interaction in 22( +) is noteworthy because antiferro-
magnetic interaction via ‘‘superexchange’’ interaction11 have
been reported in similar but acyclic spin systems12 such as
A–Y–X–Y–A, where A, X and Y represent the localised
doublet species, heteroatom (lone-pair) and m-phenylene moi-
ety, respectively. The ‘‘superexchange’’ interaction depends on
the geometry, particularly dihedral and torsion angles around
the heteroatom.13 In the DFT-optimised 32( +) (Fig. 4 and S5,
ꢀ
ESIw), the dihedral angles between the two phenyl rings A/B
and C/D were calculated to be 71.3 and 71.41, respectively,
and the average torsion angles +C(sp2)–N–C(sp2)–C(sp2)
around N2 and N4 were 41.5 and 41.71, respectively. These
structural parameters indicate that the bridging nitrogen
atoms N2 and N4 experience severe out-of-plane twisting.
Accordingly, it is reasonable to concluꢀde that the unusual
ferromagnetic interaction observed in 22( +) is ascribed to the
twisted geometry at the bridging nitrogens.13
Supramolecules, ed.
K Matsumoto, Topics in Heterocyclic
Chemistry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg, in press.
7. M. Yano, K. Sato, D. Shiomi, A. Ichimura, K. Abe, T. Takui and
K. Itoh, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 9207.
8. (a) M. M. Wienk and R. A. J. Janssen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 4492; (b) Y. Hirao, A. Ito and K. Tanaka, J. Phys. Chem. A,
2007, 111, 2951; (c) X. Z. Yan, J. Pawlas, T. Goodson III and
J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 9105.
9. L. Eberson, M. P. Hartshorn and O. Persson, Acta Chem. Scand.,
1995, 49, 640.
In summary, we have demonstrated that a high-spin ground
state is attainable in azacalix[4]arene system. The first and
successful observations of the triplet and doublet states of 2
were ensured by the radical stability arising from a combina-
tion of steric protection and spin-delocalisation. In addition, a
cyclic but non-planar framework of 2 is crucial to render the
bridging-nitrogen a ferromagnetic coupler rather than an
antiferromagnetic coupler. These findings in 2 would be
applicable to its analogous systems with larger ring size and
thus with the promising potential for higher-spin states.
Investigations along this line are now in progress.
10. F. A. Neugebauer and S. Bamberger, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1971, 10, 71.
11. (a) P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev., 1950, 79, 350; (b) P. J. Hay,
J. C. Thibeault and R. Hoffman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97,
4884; (c) T. Nakamura, T. Momose, T. Shida, K. Sato,
S. Nakazawa, T. Kinoshita, T. Takui, K. Itoh, T. Okuno,
A. Izuoka and T. Sugawara, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
8684; (d) T. Itoh, K. Matsuda and H. Iwamura, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 1791.
12. S. Suchada and A. Rajca, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117,
9172.
13. K. Matsuda, T. Yamagata, T. Seta, H. Iwamura and K. Hori,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 8058.
ꢂc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
2814 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 2812–2814