OxidatiVe Addition of Benzyl Halides to a Pd(II) Complex
Organometallics, Vol. 27, No. 18, 2008 4553
and used after filtration on alumina. Complex 10 was synthesized
during its formation) within the time scale of the reductive
elimination. This means that the Pd(II) complex 10 was
considerably more reactive with PhCH2Br than the Pd(II)
complex 12Br,15b thus pointing out the key importance of the
metallacyclic aryl and norbornyl C-Pd bonds in Pd(II) complex
10 to induce the oxidative addition.
according to a published procedure.6a
Electrochemical Setup and Electrochemical Procedure for
Cyclic Voltammetry. Experiments were carried out in a three-
electrode cell connected to a Schlenk line. The cell was equipped
with a double envelope to have a constant temperature (Lauda RC20
thermostat). The working electrode consisted of a gold disk (d )
0.5 mm). The counter electrode was a platinum wire of ca. 1 cm2
apparent surface area. The reference was a saturated calomel
electrode separated from the solution by a bridge filled with a
solution of nBu4NBF4 (0.3 M) in 3 mL of DMF. Then 8 mL of
DMF containing the same concentration of supporting electrolyte
was poured into the cell. A 10.9 mg amount of complex 10 (0.024
mmol, 3 mM) was then added. Cyclic voltammetry was performed
Analogously to the oxidative addition of PhCH2Br to 10, that
of PhCH2Cl gave the Pd(IV) complex 11Cl, which should
undergo a C-C reductive elimination to give back a Pd(II)
complex. The Pd(IV) complex 11Cl formed in the oxidative
1
addition was characterized by H NMR at -5 °C (Scheme 3)
because it underwent reductive elimination at room temperature.
Once the Pd(IV) complex 11Cl was generated in the oxidative
addition of PhCH2Cl to the Pd(II) complex 10 at 29 °C (as
followed by amperometry at the rotating disk electrode polarized
at +1 V), no oxidation current was detected at longer times.
The cyclic voltammogram did not exhibit any oxidation wave
in the range of potentials investigated here (less positive than
+1.0 V), suggesting that the oxidation wave of the expected
Pd(II) complex 12Cl should be located at more positive potential
than +1.0 V and consequently could not have been detected
during a kinetic experiment similar to that of Figure 4.
at a scan rate of 0.5 V s-1
.
General Procedure for the Kinetics of the Oxidative Addi-
tion As Monitored by Amperometry. Experiments were carried
out in the same cell as above at 29 °C. A 15 mL amount of
DMF containing 0.3 M nBu4NBF4 was poured into the cell. Then
20.5 mg (0.045 mmol, 3 mM) of complex 10 was introduced
into the cell. A rotating gold disk electrode (d ) 2 mm, EDI
65109 (Radiometer Analytical) with an angular velocity of 105
rad s-1 (Radiometer Analytical controvit)) was polarized at +1
V on the plateau of the oxidation wave of complex 10 at O1
(Figure 1b). It was checked that the oxidation current was
constant within at least 5 min. The appropriate amount of the
benzyl bromide or chloride was then added into the cell, and
the decrease of the oxidation current was recorded versus time
up to 100% conversion.
Conclusion
Summing up, it can be stated that the kinetic pathway of the
palladium-catalyzed alkylation of aryl with benzyl halides is in
agreement with the key steps of the mechanism of the catalytic
reactions (3 f 4 f 5 in Scheme 2), proposed on the basis of
the isolation of a Pd(IV) complex with phenanthroline as ligand.
It has been established that the Pd(II) metallacyclic complex
10 undergoes oxidative addition to benzyl bromide or chloride
in DMF to generate Pd(IV) complexes with the reactivity order
PhCH2Br > PhCH2Cl. The oxidative addition of PhCH2Br is
followed by a slow C-C reductive elimination from the benzyl-
Pd(IV) complex, which gives back a Pd(II) complex. The rate
constants of the oxidative additions and the reductive elimination
have been determined in DMF. These results are of general
interest because they add important information to the ongoing
debate on the competition of the mechanism involving a Pd(IV)
complex and the one based on transmetalation between Pd(II)
complexes.16 Whether the preference for the Pd(IV) complex
reported here also holds for aromatic arylation, it requires further
study, however, with a suitable model.
General Procedure for the Kinetics of the Reductive Elimina-
tion As Monitored by Amperometry. The kinetics of the
reductive elimination was followed under the same experimental
conditions reported above for the oxidative addition using the
same rotating gold disk electrode polarized at +1 V. Once the
oxidative addition of PhCH2Br (1.022 mL, 8.55 mmol, 0.57 M)
to 20.5 mg (0.045 mmol, 3 mM) of complex 10 was over, the
increase of the oxidation current of the Pd(II) complex 12Br was
recorded versus time up to 100% formation (increasing part of
Figure 4a).
Characterization of Complex 11Cl. By adding benzyl chloride
(3.6 µL, 0.031 mmol) to complex 10 (9 mg, 0.019 mmol) in 0.6
mL of CDCl3 at room temperature, a new compound, 11Cl, was
slowly formed. Its formation was followed by 1H NMR
spectroscopy, which showed its presence in solution in ca. 1:0.8
molar ratio with the starting complex 10 after 60 min. After
this time complex 11Cl was characterized by NMR spectroscopy
via COSY, NOESY, and TOCSY experiments at -5 °C using a
Varian INOVA 600 spectrometer in no spinning mode (see the
1H NMR spectrum in the Supporting Information). After longer
times, 11Cl began to decompose, making the spectrum more
Experimental Section
Chemicals. DMF was distilled from calcium hydride and kept
under argon. The benzyl chloride and bromide were commercial
1
(15) (a) At the end of the reductive elimination, the oxidation current
of the Pd(II) complex 12Br reached a value of ilim ) 2.2 µA, which was
about half of the initial oxidation current of the Pd(II) complex 10 (Figure
4a). This might be due to a lower diffusion coefficient D for 12Br compared
to that of 10 because the latter is more condensed (the current at a rotating
complex. H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, 268 K): δ 8.68 (H2′, d,
J ) 4.4 Hz), 8.43 (H11, d, J ) 7.7 Hz), 8.38 (H4′, d, J ) 7.9
Hz), 8.32 (H7′, d, J ) 8.1 Hz), 7.93-7.86 (H5′, H6′, H2′′, H6′′,
m), 7.67 (H3′, dd, J ) 7.9, 4.9 Hz), 7.44-7.31 (H8′, H3′′, H4′′,
H5′′, m), 7.22 (H10, t, J ) 7.3 Hz), 7.18 (H9, t, J ) 7.3 Hz),
7.07 (H8, d, J ) 7.3 Hz), 6.54 (H9′, d, J ) 4.8 Hz), 4.62
(benzylic-H, d, J ) 7.8 Hz), 3.98 (H2, d, J ) 7.0 Hz), 3.43
(H3, d, J ) 7.0 Hz), 3.31 (benzylic-H, d, J ) 7.9 Hz), 2.40-2.35
(H4, m), 1.51-1.40 (H5 exo, m), 1.32-1.20 (H5 endo, m), 1.13
(H7 syn, d, J ) 9.3 Hz), 1.00-0.83 (H6 exo, H1, H6 endo, m),
0.49 (H7 anti, d, J ) 9.3 Hz).
electrode is proportional to D2/3 14a
associated with an oxidation for 12Br
)
involving fewer electrons (e.g., n ) 0.5, if a dimerization process occurs
during the electron transfer) than the one-electron oxidation observed for
10.11. (b) The peak potentials Ep of 10 and 12Br look close to each other (∆
) 35 mV at a scan rate of 0.5 V s-1) but cannot be compared to evaluate
the relative ability of complexes 10 and 12Br to undergo oxidative addition
(whenever it is indicative) because peak potentials Ep might be very different
from their respective standard potentials E0. The oxidation peaks of
complexes 10 and 12Br were fully irreversible at the scan rate of 0.5 V s-1
.
Characterization of Complex 12Br. To 3 mL of a CH2Cl2
solution of 10 (50 mg, 0.11 mmol) at 0 °C was added benzyl
bromide (21 mg, 0.12 mmol) dissolved in 1 mL of CH2Cl2 under
nitrogen. The reaction mixture was allowed to reach room
temperature under stirring and was maintained at room temper-
ature for an additional 3 h. Removal of most of the solvent and
No attempt was made to increase the scan rate to determine their respective
standard potentials E0, which could be compared and might be very different
from each other. See: Bard, A. J.; Faulkner L. R. In Electrochemical
Methods, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2001; pp 234-236.
(16) (a) Ca´rdenas, D. J.; Mart´ın-Matute, B.; Echavarren, A. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5033–5040. (b) Mota, A. J.; Dedieu, A. Organo-
metallics 2006, 25, 3130–3142.