Casarini et al.
the conformer B (sc),19 a result in agreement with the corre-
sponding 13C spectrum (Supporting Information, Figure S-1).
At a temperature of -172 °C, in fact, the methylene carbon
signal of 5 appears as a single line superimposed to a pair of
equally intense lines, the single line being more intense (about
80%) than the other ones (10% each). The single major line
thus corresponds to the two CH2 carbons of the equivalent
(enantiotopic) ethyl groups of conformer A (sp), whereas the
two distinct lines with lower intensity are due to the two CH2
carbons of the diastereotopic ethyl groups of conformer B (sc)
of Scheme 1.20
In the case of compounds without fluorine substituents, the
exchange process was followed by monitoring the decoalescence
of the 13C signals of the quaternary ortho and CH meta carbons:
21
Figure 3 displays, for instance, the temperature dependence
of these lines in the case of derivative 2 (X ) Cl, R ) Me). In
Table 1 are collected the barriers,22 measured by line shape
simulation,17 for all of the compounds investigated.
As in the case of 1 and 2, also in the other methyl alcohols
investigated (3 and 4), the 13C signals of the methyl groups
bonded to the COH moiety remained equivalent (enantiotopic)
at any attainable temperature, in agreement with the mentioned
expectation of the related enantiomerization process having a
barrier too low to be experimentally detected.
It should be pointed out that, according to calculations, the
ground state (i.e., the B-type conformer of Scheme 1) of
compounds 3 and 4 (X ) Br and Me, respectively) has a value
for the dihedral angle ϑ between the aryl ring and the C1-
(19) The inversion of the relative stability of two conformers when the
ethyl groups substitute the methyl groups had been well documented in
analogous cases (see ref. 10).
FIGURE 2. Temperature dependence of the 19F NMR signal (564.3
MHz) of compound 5 in CHF2Cl/CHFCl2. The shifts are referred to
the signal of C6F6 at -163 ppm.
(20) The interconversion between the two conformers of type A and B
also involves a simultaneous rearrangement of the two ethyl groups: such
a rearrangement contributes to determine the value of the measured barrier
of 5 kcal mol-1 (the corresponding ab initio computed barrier of 4.4 kcal
mol-1 agrees well with the experiment). In the more stable conformer of
type A, in fact, the two ethyl groups adopt a symmetric relative disposition
(see the computed structure in the Supporting Information, Figure S-2), in
agreement with the observation of a single CH2 line in the mentioned 13C
spectrum at the -172 °C. In the less stable conformer of type B, on the
other hand, one of the two ethyl groups adopts a disposition different form
that of its companion (also this the computed structure is displayed in the
Supporting Information, Figure S-2). The existence of symmetric and
asymmetric conformers due to the relative disposition of two ethyl groups
has been also detected by supersonic jet mass resolved excitation spectros-
copy (see: Breen, P. J.; Bernstein, E. R.; Seeman, J. I. J. Chem. Phys.
1987, 87, 3269). A situation analogous to the present one had been also
observed in the case of 3-(1-naphthyl)pentan-3-ol.8
the transition state for this process corresponds to the structure
C (anticlinal), as shown in the rotation pathway reported in
Scheme 2.
The larger width observed at -169 °C (Figure 1) for one of
the two 19F signals might suggest that the process which
interconverts the unequally populated conformers A (sp) and
B (sc) of Scheme 1 has a rate sufficiently slow for broadening
this line, but still too fast to show the expected decoalescence,
in agreement with the quite low computed barrier of 3.15 kcal
mol-1 predicted for 1 (Scheme 2). According to this interpreta-
tion, the greater steric hindrance of the corresponding ethyl
derivative 5 should make possible the detection of this second
process at an attainable temperature. Indeed, Figure 2 shows
that at -120 °C the two fluorine atoms of 5 display two equally
intense lines, due to the freezing of the same rotation process
observed in 1, the corresponding barrier being higher than that
of 1, as anticipated (6.9 rather than 4.6 kcal mol-1). On further
cooling, these lines broaden selectively, as observed in the case
of 1, but now they split into a pair of unequally populated peaks
at -163 °C (Figure 2). These signals correspond, therefore, to
the conformers B (sc) and A (sp) of derivative 5, their relative
proportion being approximately 80:20. Line shape simulation
yields the free energy of activation required to interconvert the
major into the minor conformer (5.0 kcal mol-1).
(21) Owing to the poor solubility of 4 and 11 at temperatures lower than
1
-120 °C, these barriers were measured by monitoring the H signal (600
MHz) of the o-methyl substituents.
(22) As often observed in conformational process, the ∆Gq value was
found independent of temperature within the experimental uncertainty of
the NMR measurements. See: Hoogosian, S.; Bushweller, C. H.; Anderson,
W. G.; Kigsley, G. J. Phys. Chem. 1976, 80, 643. Lunazzi, L.; Cerioni, G.;
Ingold, K. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 7484. Forlani, L.; Lunazzi L.;
Medici, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18, 4525. Bernardi, F.; Lunazzi, L.;
Zanirato, P.; Cerioni, G. Tetrahedron 1977, 33, 1337. Lunazzi, L.;
Magagnoli, C.; Guerra, M.; Macciantelli, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 3031.
Cremonini, M. A.; Lunazzi, L.; Placucci, G.; Okazaki, R.; Yamamoto, G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2915. Anderson, J. E.; Tocher, D. A.; Casarini,
D.; Lunazzi, L. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 1731. Borghi, R.; Lunazzi, L.;
Placucci, G.; Cerioni, G.; Foresti, E.; Plumitallo, A. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 4924. Garcia, M. B.; Grilli, S., Lunazzi, L.; Mazzanti, A., Orelli, L. R.
J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6679. Garcia, M. B.; Grilli, S., Lunazzi, L.;
Mazzanti, A., Orelli, L. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 4018. Casarini, D.;
Rosini, C.; Grilli, S; Lunazzi, L.; Mazzanti, A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
1815. Casarini, D.; Grilli, S.; Lunazzi, L.; Mazzanti, A. J. Org. Chem. 2004,
69, 345. Bartoli, G.; Lunazzi, L.; Massacesi, M.; Mazzanti, A. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 821. Casarini, D.; Coluccini, C.; Lunazzi, L.; Mazzanti, A.;
Rompietti, R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5746.
Contrary to the case of 1, ab initio computations predict that
the conformer A (sp) of 5 is 0.47 kcal mol-1 more stable than
1000 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 3, 2007