Sampedro et al.
Results and Discussion
On the basis of our previous results, it is clear that the key
feature of these reactions is the competition between fast
deactivation and photocycloaddition, with the relative ratio
controlled by the energy of the CI points involved. Compounds
3 and 4, in which fast deactivation (3) and photocycloaddition
(4) were detected experimentally, show potential energy surfaces
(PES) consistent with these facts (Figure 1). When the energy
of the CI point is low enough, fast deactivation can occur and
photocycloaddition, although energetically available, does not
take place. In contrast, when the CI point has a higher energy,
the system has to spend some time in the excited state, thus
allowing the reaction to occur. Accordingly, if we manage to
understand the geometrical aspects that affect the CI point and
its relative energy, we could gain a deeper understanding of
the reaction mechanism, and this information could be used to
predict the feasibility of any reaction and even design a system
that is able to successfully photocycloadd to olefins. With this
aim in mind, we analyzed the CI points for 3 and 4 (see Fig-
ure 2).
It can be seen that most of the geometric parameters for the
two CI points are very similar, with differences no greater than
0.003 Å. Clearly these small differences in the geometry can
hardly account for such different reactivity, in that 3 is known
not to photocycloadd to olefins and 4 yields azetidines after
irradiation. However, one of the distances, marked in red in
Figure 2, is sufficiently different in the two structures to allow
an explanation to be put forward. The key feature of these
geometries is the triangular shape of the CdN-O moiety, which
is planar in the ground state. This deformation causes the
ground-state energy to increase while the excited state is
stabilized, a situation that leads to the CI. The only distinction
between 3 and 4 is the cyano group. The electron-withdrawing
effect of the CN transmitted by the phenyl ring causes a partial
positive charge to appear on the carbon atom of the CdN-O
moiety in 4. This partial positive charge interacts with the O
atom, causing the C-O distance to shorten from 1.830 Å in 3
to 1.818 Å in 4. Perhaps this deformation contributes to an
increase in the energy of the CI point, thus allowing the system
to spend some time in the excited state and yield photocycload-
dition. To check that the enlargement of the active space is not
essential, we carried out further calculations on 4 including the
π orbitals of the cyano group (CAS(14,11)). Both geometries
and relative energies remained almost unaltered.
FIGURE 1. Critical points along the potential energy surfaces of
isoxazolines 3 and 4 (top).
which the experimental outcome is available. In the case of
3-phenyl-2-isoxazoline (3), fast deactivation takes place, whereas
3-(p-cyanophenyl)-2-isoxazoline (4) successfully undergoes
cycloaddition to alkenes. The reason behind this behavior seems
to lie not only in the feasibility of the photocycloaddition but
also in the competition between this reaction and fast deactiva-
tion to the ground state. We wish to report here the results of
a theoretical study into the effect of alkene substitution and
regiochemistry issues in the [2 + 2] photocycloaddition of
alkenes to isoxazolines and an experimental study carried out
to confirm the theoretical data.
Computational Details. All critical points were computed
using fully unconstrained ab initio quantum chemical computa-
tions in the framework of a CASPT2//CASSCF strategy.12 This
process requires the reaction coordinate to be computed at the
complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) level of
theory and the corresponding energy profile to be re-evaluated
at the multiconfigurational second order Møller-Plesset per-
turbation theory level (here we used the CASPT2 method
implemented in MOLCAS-6.4)13 to take into account the effect
of electron dynamic correlation. All computations were carried
out at the CASSCF level with the 6-31G* basis set. The active
space was chosen depending on the compounds considered but
in each case included the π and π* orbitals of the imine and
alkene moieties and the N lone pair. Depending on the alkene
considered, the active space also included ketone π and π*
orbitals, N or O lone pairs. The zeroth order wave function used
in the single-point CASPT2 calculations needed for the re-
evaluation of the energy profile is a three root (S0, S1, S2) state
average CASSCF wave function with the 6-31G* basis set. The
same type of wave function was used where necessary in order
to avoid convergence problems. The structure of the conical
intersection (CI) funnels associated with each path were
optimized by applying the methodology included in GAUSSIAN
03.14
Having assessed the effect of substitution on the CI geometry
and thus on the course of the reaction, we aimed to study the
regioselectivity of the reaction. For this purpose, we calculated
the critical points for the photocycloaddition of 2 to methyl vinyl
ether. We chose 2 for this part of the study because of its similar
behavior and deformation in the excited state as 411 and its
smaller size. It has been reported15 that a singlet excited state
is involved in the photochemistry of this kind of compound.
(14) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery Jr., J. A.; Stratmann,
R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.;
Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.;
Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson,
G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.;
Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.;
Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts,
R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.;
Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.;
Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.;
Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, reVision C.02; Gaussian Inc.:
Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
(12) Olivucci, M.; Sinicropi, A. In Computational Photochemistry; Olivucci,
M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2005.
(13) Andersson, K.; Barisz, M.; Bernhardsson, A.; Blomberg, M. R. A.;
Cooper, D. L.; Fleig, T.; Fu¨lscher, M. P.; de Graaf, C.; Hess, B. A.; Karlstro¨m,
G.; Lindh, R.; Malmqvist, P.-Å.; Neogra´dy, P.; Olsen, J.; Roos, B. O.;
Schmmelpfennid, B.; Schu¨ltz, M.; Sadlej, A. J.; Schu¨tz, M.; Seijo, L.; Serrano-
Andre´s, L.; Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Stårling, J.; Thorsteinsson, T.; Veryazov, V.;
Widmark, P.-O. MOLCAS, Version 6.4; University of Lund: Lund, Sweden, 2003.
8332 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 21, 2008