5656 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 104, No. 23, 2000
Deng et al.
It is relevant to mention that the dependence of the lifetimes
of the carotenoid lowest excited singlet states on solvent polarity
has been investigated.40 As the dielectric constant of the solvent
increases from 1.9 to 36, the lifetime of the lowest excited singlet
state of all-trans 7′-apo-7′,7′-dicyano-â-carotene decreases from
11.7 to 1.9 ps. AM1 molecular orbital calculations predict a
large change in dipole moments between the lowest excited
singlet and the ground states (a 5.1 D increase); interaction of
the excited-state dipole with solvent dipoles results in enhanced
charge-transfer character within the excited state, which in turn
enhances nonradiative decay of the excited state.
The photophysical properties of donor-acceptor molecules,
“push-pull” polyenes, and carotenoids bearing various acceptor
and donor groups and linked together by chains of different
length and structure have been studied by absorption and
fluorescence spectroscopy.25 The position of the absorption and
fluorescence maxima and their variation in solvents of increasing
polarity are in agreement with an intramolecular charge transfer
(ICT) nature, which will greatly enhance the sensitivity of the
polyene photophysical parameters to solvent polarity. In this
study, the aldehydes IV-VI, which are substituted with a
strongly electron-accepting group, display ICT properties be-
cause their absorption spectra exhibit solvent-sensitive behavior
as shown in Figure 5. In contrast, the esters I-III, substituted
with a weaker electron-accepting group, do not show ICT
properties because their spectra are not sensitive to solvents
(Figure 4). This behavior is also in agreement with the
magnitudes of the dipole moments of these carotenoids. As
shown in Figure 8, the dipoles of the neutral species of the
aldehydes IV-VI are much larger than those of the esters I-III.
The larger the dipole of a species, the more intense the
interaction between the species and the solvent, resulting in
enhancement of the sensitivity of the polyene photophysical
parameters to solvent polarity.
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Elli Hand for synthesizing
the carotenoids. This work was supported by the Division of
Chemical Sciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S.
Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-FG02-86-ER13465.
References and Notes
(1) Goedheer, J. C. Annu. ReV. Plant Physiol. 1972, 23, 87.
(2) Koyama, Y. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 1991, B9, 265.
(3) Frank, H. A.; Violette, C. A.; Trautman, J. K.; Shreve, A. P.; Owens,
T. G.; Albrecht, A. C. Pure Appl. Chem. 1991, 63, 109.
(4) Bendich, A.; Olson, J. A. FASEB J. 1989, 3, 1927.
(5) Burton, G. W.; Ingold, K. U. Science 1984, 224, 569.
(6) Ziegler, R. G. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991, 53, 251S.
(7) Krinsky, N. I. Clin. Nutr. 1988, 7, 107.
(8) Bendich, A. J. Nutr. 1989, 199, 112.
(9) Malone, W. F. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991, 53, 305S.
(10) Seta, P.; Bienvenue, E.; Moore, A. L.; Mathis, P.; Bensasson, R.
V.; Liddell, P.; Pessiki, P. J.; Moore, T. A.; Gust, D. Nature 1985, 316,
653.
(11) Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L.; Makings, L. R.; Seely, G.
R.; Ma, X.; Trier, T. T.; Gao, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7567.
(12) Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L.; Lee, S. J.; Bittersmann, E.;
Luttrull, D. K.; Rehms, A. A.; DeGraziano, J. M.; Ma, X. C.; Gao, F.;
Belford, R. E.; Trier, T. T. Science 1990, 248, 199.
(13) Mathis, P.; Rutherford, A. W. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1984, 767,
217.
(14) Ioffe, N. T.; Engovatov, A. A.; Mairanovskii, V. G. Zh. Obshch.
Khim. 1976, 46, 1638.
(15) Matsuyama, T.; Sakai, H.; Yamaoka, H.; Maeda, Y. J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 1982, 229.
(16) Ding, R.; Grant, J. L.; Metzger, R. M.; Kispert, L. D. J. Phys. Chem.
1988, 92, 4600.
(17) Jeevarajan, J. A.; Wei, C. C.; Jeevarajan, A. S.; Kispert, L. D. J.
Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 5637.
(18) Gao, G.; Deng, Y.; Kispert, L. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 7844.
(19) Mathis, P.; Vermeglio, A. Photochem. Photobiol. 1972, 15, 157.
(20) Jeevarajan, A. S.; Wei, C. C.; Kispert, L. D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1994, 2, 861.
(21) Khaled, M.; Hadjipetrou, A.; Kispert, L. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1991,
95, 2438.
(22) Jeevarajan, A. S.; Khaled, M.; Kispert, L. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1994,
98, 7777.
(23) Jeevarajan, J. A.; Kispert, L. D. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1996, 411,
Conclusions
57.
From voltammetry and optical spectroscopic studies of three
series of carotenoids substituted with terminal ester, aldehyde,
and cyano groups with different lengths of the backbone chain,
we have drawn the following conclusions: (1) For carotenoids
substituted with weak terminal electron acceptors (ester groups),
the stability of the radical cations is relatively low, and the
radical cations with shorter length are more stable than those
with longer length. (2) In contrast, for carotenoids substituted
with a strong terminal electron acceptor (aldehyde group), the
stability of the radical cations is relatively high, and the stability
of radical cations increases slightly with increasing conjugated
backbone length. (3) For carotenoids substituted with cyano
terminal groups, the stability of the radical cations is relatively
high, and the stability of the radical cations decreases slightly
with increasing conjugated backbone length. (4) For all esters,
aldehydes, and nitriles, the shorter the olefin chain, the more
difficult the oxidation. (5) The aldehydes display intramolecular
charge transfer (ICT) properties because their absorption spectra
exhibit solvent-sensitive behavior; in contrast, the esters do not.
(6) It is evident that the radical cation stability is related to the
change in dipole moment between radical cations and the neutral
species; AM1 calculations predict large decreases in dipole
moment between radical cations and neutral species for the
aldehydes and nitriles, but increases for the esters. (7) Interaction
of the radical cation dipoles with the solvent dipoles results in
enhanced decay of the radical cations.
(24) Blanchard-Desce, M.; Ledoux, I.; Lehn, J.-M.; Maltheˆte, J.; Zyss,
J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1988, 737.
(25) Slama-Schwok, A.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Lehn, J.-M. J. Phys.
Chem. 1990, 94, 3894.
(26) Filzmoser, M.; Roth, S. Synth. Met. 1991, 42, 1263.
(27) Bublitz, G. U.; Ortiz, R.; Marder, S. R.; Boxer, S. G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 3365.
(28) Tretiak, S.; Chernyak, V.; Mukamel, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 11408.
(29) Orlandi, G.; Zerbetto, F.; Zgierski, M. Z. Chem. ReV. 1991, 91,
867.
(30) Anderson, P. O.; Gillbro, T. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 2509.
(31) Anderson, P. O.; Bachilo, S. M.; Chen, R.-L.; Gillbro, T. J. Phys.
Chem. 1995, 99, 16199.
(32) Details to be published elsewhere.
(33) Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902.
(34) HyperChem Version 4.0 supplied by HyperCube, Inc., 419 Phillip
Street, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3 × 2.
(35) Rudolph, M.; Reddy, D. P.; Feldberg, S. W. Anal. Chem. 1994,
66, 589A. DigiSim is available from Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., 2701 Kent
Avenue, West Lafayette, IN 47906.
(36) Khaled, M.; Hadjipetrou, A.; Kispert, L. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1990,
94, 5164.
(37) Jeevarajan, A. S.; Khaled, M.; Kispert, L. D. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1994, 225, 340.
(38) Jeevarajan, J. A.; Jeevarajan, A. S.; Kispert, L. D. J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 1996, 92, 1757.
(39) Piekara-Sady, L.; Jeevarajan, A. S.; Kispert, L. D. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1993, 207, 173.
(40) O’Neil, M. P.; Wasielewski, M. R.; Khaled, M. M.; Kispert, L. D.
J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 7212.