transition, which also contrasts to the usual spectral feature
of meso-aryl substituted subporphyrins as seen in 2 and 3.
The enhanced electronic interactions of 1 can be seen also
in the fluorescence. The dimer 2 emits green fluorescence at
516 nm with its quantum yield (ΦF) of 0.15, which is
comparable to that of 3 (ΦF ) 0.13). On the other hand, the
dimer 1 exhibits yellowish-green fluorescence at 531 nm
tailing over 650 nm as a good mirror image of Q(0,0) band.
Interestingly, the fluorescence quantum yield of 1 (ΦF )
0.28) is ca. 2-fold of 3.
between the biphenylene linker and porphyrin mean plane
is roughly perpendicular. This leads to small through-bond
interactions between two porphyrins in the ground state. On
the other hand, 4,4′-biphenylene bridge in 1 can serve as a
conjugated linker which enables strong orbital interactions
between two subporphyrins. Consequently, a 4,4′-biphenyl-
ene subunit can provide remarkable through-bond interaction
for the subporphyrin case.
To confirm the enhanced electronic interactions in 1, the
electrochemical properties of 1-3 were examined by cyclic
voltammetry, which also revealed a distinctly different
property of 1 from those of 2 and 3 (Table 1 and Supporting
Information). The first oxidation and reduction waves of 2
were observed at 0.81 and -1.91 V (vs ferrocene/ferroce-
nium ion couple) both as reversible processes. On the basis
of these results, the electrochemical HOMO-LUMO gap
of 2 has been estimated to be 2.72 eV, which is similar to
that of monomer 3 (2.68 eV). On the other hand, the dimer
1 shows two reversible oxidation waves at 0.61 and 0.75 V.
The first oxidation potential of 1 is remarkably lower than
those of 2 and 3, although the reduction potential of 1 is
similar to 2 and 3. As a consequence, the HOMO-LUMO
gap of 1 is ca. 0.15 V smaller than 2 and 3, which is in
good agreement with optical HOMO-LUMO gaps (2.51,
2.55, and 2.56 eV for 1, 2, and 3, respectively).
Figure 3. Frontier molecular orbitals of 1 and 2 calculated at the
B3LYP/6-31* level.
Table 1. Redox Potentialsa and Electrochemical
HOMO-LUMO Gaps of 1-3
While the B-B′ distance in 1 is fixed, that of 2 can change
upon bond rotation. Since axially coordinated boron ligand
can be changed reversibly by carboxyl groups,2,4 we
examined axial ligand exchange reaction with biphenyl-3,3′-
dicarboxylic acid (4) to form a 1:1 cyclic complex, 5, in
which the distance and arrangement of two subporphyrins
are fixed. A 1:1 mixture of 2 and 4 was refluxed in toluene
under diluted conditions (∼125 µM). After removal of the
solvent, complex 5 was obtained quantitatively. The ESI-
TOF mass spectrum of 5 exhibits its parent cation peak at
m/z ) 1179.4028, which is calculated for C80H49N6B2O4 )
1179.4019 [2 - 2 × MeOH + 4]+. The 1H NMR spectrum
also supports the cyclic structure of 5, featuring C2 symmetric
signal pattern and shielded signals at 6.7-7.0 ppm due to
axial ligand. The highly deshielded singlet at 9.28 ppm is
assigned to the biphenylene bridge proton (Ha in Scheme
2), and this characteristic shift is attributed to the diatropic
ring current of the two subporphyrins forced in a face-to-
face conformation.
E2
E1
E1
HOMO-LUMO gap
ox,1/2
ox,1/2
red,1/2
1
2
3
0.75
0.61
0.81
0.71
-1.93
-1.91
-1.97
2.54
2.72
2.68
a Values are reported in V vs ferrocene/ferrocenium ion couple.
Measurement conditions: solvent, CH2Cl2 with 0.10 M Bu4NPF6 as a
supporting electrolyte; working electrode, glassy carbon; counter electrode,
platinum; reference electrode, Ag/AgClO4.
Molecular orbital calculations of 1 and 2 were performed
with the Gaussian 03 package8 at the B3LYP/6-31G* level
on the basis of the crystal structure and the optimized
structure, respectively. In the optimized structure, the dimer
2 takes a relatively planar conformation with a B-B′ distance
of 14.5 Å. Interestingly, HOMO and LUMO of 1 show large
orbital coefficients on the biphenylene bridge, whereas those
of 2 are vanishingly small at the bridge, suggesting efficient
and inefficient elongation of π-conjugation for 4,4′- and 3,3′-
biphenylene linkages, respectively. The HOMO-LUMO
gaps of 1, 2, and 3 were calculated to be 2.94, 3.17, and
3.18 eV, respectively, showing a certain decrease for 1 in
accord with the experimental results. In the case of bi-
phenylene-bridged porphyrin dimers,9 the dihedral angle
The dihedral angle of two subporphyrins’ mean plane is
88° for 5, and the boron-boron distance is kept distinctly
short (10.3 Å) (Supporting Information). UV-vis absorption
spectrum of 5 recorded in CH2Cl2 was, however, almost
identical to that of 2, exhibiting absorption maxima at 371,
458, and 481 nm. Although the center-to-center interchro-
mophore distances of 2 and 5 are considerably shorter than
1, perturbations observed in their UV-vis absorption spectra
(8) For the full citation, see the Supporting Information.
(9) Cho, S.; Yoon, M.-C.; Kim, C. H.; Aratani, N.; Mori, G.; Joo, T.;
Osuka, A.; Kim, D. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 14881–14888.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 24, 2008
5563