Angewandte
Chemie
(1S,2S)-norpseudoephedrine (1’) in place of
1, an analogous crystalline salt (1’·8c) was
prepared and applied in the photoreaction.
After photoirradiation, the reaction mix-
ture was treated with an excess amount of
been reported to be less stable than the HT dimers, owing to
the electrostatic repulsion between the two carboxylate
moieties.[19] As far as we are aware, the HH/HT ratios
achieved herein are among the highest reported for this kind
of bimolecular photoreactions.[6,16–19] These observations
indicate that the high HH selectivities of the dimerizations
are attributable not to an intrinsic preference of the starting
material, but to the special environments provided by the
liquid-crystalline matrices. Assuming a bilayer-like molecular
alignment in the smectic phases, as depicted in Figure 1b, an
intralayer dimerization can reasonably elucidate the nearly
exclusive formation of HH dimers.
trimethylsilyldiazomethane to thoroughly
esterify the carboxyl groups in the system (those in unreacted
8c, the photodimers, and other products), and then subjected
to preparative thin-layer chromatography (TLC) to remove
the amphiphilic amino alcohol 1. The composition of the
1
recovered esters was determined by H NMR spectroscopy
and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), which
allowed us to unambiguously estimate the conversion of 8c
and the regio-, diastereo-, and enantioselectivities of the
photodimerization.
Thus, highly HH-selective photodimerization of 8c was
established by using two kinds of liquid-crystalline reaction
media. Nevertheless, the stereochemical outcome of the
photodimerization, in terms of the synHH/antiHH ratio,
revealed striking differences between the two liquid-crystal-
line phases. Indeed, the smectic1 phase afforded the antiHH
dimer as the main product (synHH/antiHH = 26:72–28:70;
Table 1, entries 1 and 2), whereas the smectic2 phase yielded
As summarized in Table 1, the two smectic phases were
found to realize acceptable reactivity to give a mixture of the
target dimers (9c) in 23–55% yield after photoirradiation for
3 hours (entries 1–3). In the isotropic phase, the photoreac-
tion proceeded so fast that 87% of the starting material were
consumed under conditions differing only in phase and
temperature (entry 4). In contrast, the crystalline phase of
1’·8c did not provide any detectable amount of the photodi-
mer 9c (entry 5), as might be expected from the general
properties of crystalline reaction fields. These observations
indicated the superiority of the liquid-crystalline phases
compared to the crystalline phase in the context of reaction
probability.
Quite interestingly, the regioselectivity (HH/HT ratio) of
the photodimerization changed dramatically depending on
the phase, which clearly demonstrates the peculiar property
of liquid crystals as “constrained” reaction media. In fact,
both of the smectic phases realized excellent regioselectivities
to yield the HH dimers almost exclusively (HH/HT= 97:3–
98:2; Table 1, entries 1–3). These regioselectivities are oppo-
site to the usual tendency (HT> HH), which is governed by
the relative stability of the products; the HH dimers have
almost equal amounts of the two diastereomers (synHH
/
antiHH = 44:53; entry 3). Although the origin of the syn/anti
selectivity is unclear at present, we believe that the packing
mode of the liquid-crystalline matrix has a large influence on
the syn/anti selectivity, which is at least as large as the
influence of the reaction temperature. Indeed, experiments
conducted in the same phase (smectic1) but at different
temperatures (30 and 458C), resulted in virtually the same
syn/anti selectivities (entries 1 and 2).
The liquid-crystalline media were found to offer reaction
environments with excellent chirality-induction ability. Par-
ticularly, the photodimerization performed in the smectic1
phase afforded the antiHH dimer with high enantioselectivity
(up to 81% ee; Table 1, entries 1 and 2). In the case of the
smectic2 phase, the enantioselectivity was also at an appreci-
able level, although somewhat lower (48% ee; entry 3). These
results contrast strikingly with the insufficient enantioselec-
tivity attained in the isotropic phase
(9% ee; entry 4). The outstanding
Table 1: Photodimerization of 2-anthracenecarboxylic acid (8c).
enantioselectivities achieved in the
smectic phases are not likely to be a
simple chirality transfer within the
discrete salt pair; the formation of a
chiral supramolecular architecture
would be essential for efficient
chirality induction. To our knowl-
edge, the reaction conducted in the
smectic1 phase is the first asymmet-
Entry
Medium
T [8C]
State[a]
Yield [%][b]
Product ratio [%][c]
ee [%][d]
ric synthesis induced by a chiral
liquid crystal.[8] Moreover, the pres-
ent system provides a very rare
example of an intermolecular pho-
tochemical reaction in which satis-
factory yield and regio-, diastereo-,
and enantioselectivities were simul-
taneously realized; the antiHH
dimer was produced in 34% overall
yield with 81% ee (entry 2).[19]
antiHT
synHT
antiHH
synHH
1
2
3
4
1
1
1
1
30
45
80
110
30
25
Sm1
Sm1
Sm2
Iso
Cry
Sol
23
48
55
87
<1
88
1
1
1
10
–
1
1
2
12
–
72
70
53
38
–
26
28
44
30
–
+78
+81
+48
+9
–
5
1’
H2O
CH2Cl2
6[19k][e]
43
32
36
22
14
25
7
21
–
–
7[19j]
20
Sol
96
1
[a] Sm=smectic, Iso=isotropic, Cry=crystalline, Sol=solution. [b] Determined by H NMR spectros-
copy. [c] Determined by HPLC. [d] Enantiomeric excess of antiHH-9c determined by chiral HPLC. [e] A
phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0) was used as the medium.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8241 –8245
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
8243