good yields of 3i–3k (68–85%, Table 1, entries 9–11). The
structure of the 2-acyl furans was further confirmed by X-
ray crystallographic analysis of 3c[10] and 2D NMR spectrum
of 3k.
(Z)-Enynols bearing a substituent at the C3 position were
prepared by the Sonogashira coupling reaction of iodinated
allylic alcohols with terminal alkynes. The iodide precursors
were conveniently synthesized from the corresponding prop-
argylic alcohols by their reaction with Red-Al (Red-Al=
sodium bis(2-methoxyethoxy)aluminumhydride) followed by
iodination of the organoaluminum intermediate.[11] Thus
enynols 1l–1q can be easily constructed by three steps from
two alkynes and one aldehyde. The following IBX-mediated
cyclization represents a diversity oriented protocol for the
convergent construction of 3,5-disubstituted-2-acyl furans.
As shown in Table 2, the aryl, alkyl, and TMS groups at C3
Scheme 2. Reactions of (Z)-enynol 1a with IBX.
53%, 9 h). The use of DMP instead of IBX only afforded a
complicated reaction mixture as observed by H NMR spec-
troscopy at 08C for 1.5 h in CH2Cl2.
As illustrated in Tables 1 and 2, the present method could
be applied successfully to a wide range of cis-enynols bear-
ing various substituents at C1–C5. The cyclization of enynols
1a–1 f, which were not substituted at C2 and C3, were inves-
1
Table 2. Formation of 3,5-disubstituted 2-acyl furans mediated by IBX.
Table 1. Formation
of
2-acyl
furans
mediated
by
IBX.
Enynol
R1
R2
Ph
u
Ph
Ph
R3
Ph
t [h]
Product
Yield [%][a]
1
2
3
4
5
6
1l
Ph
B
TMS
Ph
B
3
Ph
4
3
H
3
3l
4 3m
3n
3o
3 3p
3q
59
70
70
78
76
40
Enynol R1
R2 R3 R4
t
Prod- Yield
1m
1n
1o
1p
1q
Ph
Ph
[h] uct
[%][a]
Ph
H
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1 f
1g
1h
1i
Ph
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Ph
Ph
Ph
4.5 3a
18 3b
15 3c
79[b]
64[c]
72
67
86
u
p-BrC6H4
p-MeOC6H4
p-ClC6H4
p-ClC6H4
Et
Ph
Et
Ph
H
H
Ph
p-ClC6H4
H
[a] Isolated yields.
H
p-MeOC6H4 15 3d
H
H
p-ClC6H4
Ph
15 3e
4
4
7
3 f
60[b]
–[d]
Et
Et
Et
Et
Bu
Ph
Ph
Ph
in enynol 1 are all compatible with this cyclization reaction,
furnishing the corresponding products 3l–3q in 40–78%
yields. It should be noted that in the case of 3l, a decreased
yield of 31% was observed at a prolonged reaction time
(6.5 h). Interestingly, when terminal alkynes of 1o–1q were
used, 3,5-disubstituted-2-furaldehydes 3o–3q were formed
in 40–78% yields (Table 2, entries 4–6). However, for eny-
nols substituted both at C2 and C3, for example, in the case
of (Z)-2,3-diethyl-5-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-1-phenyl-pent-2-en-
4-yn-1-ol (1r), only a mixture of 2-acyl furan 3r and oxida-
tion product of ketone 2r with a ratio of 1:1.8 (908C, 13 h)
was isolated in a combined yield of 72%.
Although further investigations to clarify the reaction
mechanism are needed, a tentatively suggested reaction
pathway is shown as follows (Scheme 3): first, an enynone
2a is formed by oxidation of 1a. In the next step, IBX may
act as an electrophile to promote the cycloaddition of car-
bonyl group to the alkyne moiety. Thus, an anti-5-exo-dig
cyclization is resulted to give 4. This is followed by addition
of hydroxyl group to the exocyclic double bond to form 5,
which subsequently decomposes to give 2-acyl furan 3a and
1-iodosobenzoic acid (IBA).
3h
41
68
85
81
10 3i
12 3j
12 3k
10 1j
11 1k
p-ClC6H4
p-MeOC6H4 Et
Ph
[a] Isolated yields. Unless otherwise noted, 3.0 equiv IBX was used. [b]
2.0 equiv IBX was used. [c] 49% yield when 2.0 equiv IBX was used. [d]
A mixture of structurally unidentified products was observed.
tigated first. We found that the substituents Br, OMe and Cl
on the aromatic rings at C1 and C5 were well tolerated
during the reaction, furnishing the corresponding furans 3b–
3e in 64%–86% yield with relatively long reaction times of
15–18 h (Table 1, entries 2–5). Introducing an alkyl group at
C1 also afforded furan 3 f in a satisfactory yield of 60% at
908C (Table 1, entry 6). When enynol 1g with an alkyl sub-
situent at C5 was employed, the desired 2-acyl furan was
not observed; instead a mixture of structurally unidentified
products were formed (Table 1, entry 7). The results of eny-
nols 1h–1k bearing an additional alkyl substituent at C2 are
highly dependent on the substituents on C1. Enynol 1h sub-
stituted both at C1 and C2 with alkyl groups resulted in a
lower yield of 3h (41%, Table 1, entry 8). We envisioned
that this may due to the lower stability of dialkyl-substituted
furan 3h under IBX oxidation conditions. However, chang-
ing the alkyl substituent at C1 to aryl groups resulted in
To support the reaction mechanism, the reaction of eny-
none 2a and IBX (1.2 equiv) was carried out. The desired
product 3a was obtained in 80% yield (Scheme 4, top). It is
9496
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 9495 – 9498