P. M. C. Glória et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 7355–7357
7357
2.42 (2H, m), 2.76 (6H, s), 3.34 (1H, q, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.68 (3H, s), 5.03 (1H, d,
J = 10.4 Hz), 5.07 (1H, d, J = 17.1 Hz), 5.75 (1H, m), 6.48 (1H, d, J = 6.8 Hz). ESIMS
m/z: 184,12146 (C9H16N2O4 require 184,12118).
Acknowledgements
We thank Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FC&T, Lisbon,
Portugal) for partial financial support (Project POCTI/QUI/36456).
One of us (P.M.C.G.) is grateful for the award of a fellowship from
FC&T.
7. The rearrangement of enamine 6 (Scheme 2b) was accomplished with the
formation of allyl diethylmalonate (16, 52% yield). The formation of this can be
explained by
a competitive reaction initiated by a Hofmann elimination
affording cyclohexene and the enamine 140 . This can rearrange to form the
imine 15, which can then liberate HCN affording the allyl diethylmalonate (16)
References and notes
1. MacMillan, S. N.; Tanski, J. M.; Waterman, R. Chem. Commun. 2007, 40, 4172–
4174; Leung, C. H.; Voutchkova, A. M.; Crabtree, R. H.; Balcells, D.; Eisenstein, O.
Green Chem. 2007, 9, 976–979.
2. Cope, A. C.; Hardy, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62, 441–444; Levy, H.; Cope, A. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944, 66, 1684–1688.
3. Weston, M. H.; Nakajima, K.; Back, T. G. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4630–4637;
Majumdar, K. C.; Alam, S.; Chattopadhyay, B. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 597–643;
Gonzalez, I.; Bellas, I.; Souto, A.; Rodriguez, R.; Cruces, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008,
49, 2002–2004; Fanning, K. N.; Jamieson, A. G.; Sutherland, A. Curr. Org. Chem.
2006, 10, 1007–1020; Nubbemeyer, U. Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 244, 149–213;
Fiedler, D.; Bergman, R. G.; Raymond, K. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6748–
6751.
4. Gomes, M. J. S.; Sharma, L.; Prabhakar, S.; Lobo, A. M.; Glória, P. M. C. Chem.
Commun. 2002, 746–747.
5. Casarini, M. E.; Ghelfi, F.; Libertini, E.; Pagnoni, U. M.; Parsons, A. F. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 7925–7932.
6. Typical experimental procedure: A solution 0.14 M of the (E)-methyl 3-(1-allyl-
2,2-dimethylhydrazinyl) acrylate (4a, Table 1, entry 1) in diphenylether (1 ml)
was heated under reflux until all the starting materials had been consumed
(10 min) (tlc control, silica, n-hexane/AcOEt 2:1 as eluent). Evaporation of the
solvent under reduced pressure, followed by purification of the residue by ptlc,
gave the stable hydrazone (5a, Table 1, entry 1), as a light yellow oil (73% yield).
Selected spectroscopic data: Compound 4a: IR (neat) 1694 (C@O) cmꢀ1
;
1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3 d): 2.45 (6H, s), 3.57 (3H, s), 3.70 (2H, d, J = 5.6 Hz), 4.71 (1H, d,
J = 8.7 Hz), 5.18–5.12 (2H, m), 5.73 (1H, m), 7.47 (1H, d, J = 11.8 Hz); EIMS m/z
185 [(M+H)+, 100], 184 (M+, 73), 153 (C8H13N2O+, 61), 143 (C6H11N2O2þ, 51).
8. Gilbert, J. C.; Cousins, K. R. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 10671–10684.
Compound 5a: IR (neat) 1737 (C@O) cmꢀ1 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d: 2.57–
;