Table 3 Pseudo-first order rate constants (sϪ1) for ligand exchange rates of alcohols with [Fe(TMP)(OAr)] in dichloromethane at 60.0 ЊC
Phenolate ligand substituent(s) (phenol pKa)
Alcohol
2,4,6-Me3 (10.9)
4-CH3O (10.2)
H (10.0)
4-CF3 (8.7)
4-NO2 (7.2)
CH3OH
3 × 10Ϫ4
2 × 10Ϫ3
2 × 10Ϫ3
3 × 10Ϫ3
8 × 10Ϫ3
5 × 10Ϫ3
2 × 10Ϫ3
8 × 10Ϫ4
1 × 10Ϫ4
CH3CH2OH
(CH3)2CHOH
CF3CH2OH
(CH3)3COH
Scheme 2 Mechanism for the exchange of axial phenolate ligands with alcohols.
with a mechanism where the phenolates are displaced by a dir-
ect nucleophilic attack by the alcohol (Scheme 2) where the rate
depends on the nucleophilicities and the bulk of the alcohol
and the leaving group ability of the phenolate.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy
The UV-vis spectra and kinetics were measured on a Hewlett-
Packard 8453 Diode Array spectrophotometer equipped with a
thermostatted cell holder. The kinetics with carboxylic acids
were studied at 25.0 ЊC with [Fe(TMP)(OAr)] = 7.7 × 10Ϫ6
M
and [carboxylic acid] = 1.3 × 10Ϫ3 M, and with alcohols at
60.0 ЊC in toluene with [Fe(TMP)(OAr)] = 7.7 × 10Ϫ6 M and
[alcohol] = 0.17–0.40 M.
Experimental
Materials
The iron() tetramesitylporphyrin carboxylate complexes
were found to undergo slow photochemical decomposition in
dichloromethane to form [Fe(TMP)Cl], probably by photo-
chemically induced homolytic cleavage of the iron–oxygen
bond to give iron() tetramesitylporphyrin and a carboxyl rad-
ical.17 The latter can then undergo unimolecular decomposition
to a carbon radical and carbon dioxide. Chloride ion must
then be formed by a reaction of the carbon radical with
dichloromethane and subsequent decomposition of the
dichloromethyl radical. The diode array light source initiates
this photochemical decomposition. Use of a 300 nm cut-off
filter significantly reduces the rate of photochemical decom-
position of the carboxylate complex. Reactions in toluene
do not undergo this decomposition presumably because the
toluene absorbs strongly below 280 nm.
Dichloromethane and toluene were refluxed over calcium
hydride then distilled. Methanol and ethanol were refluxed
over the corresponding magnesium alkoxide then distilled.
Tetrahydrofuran was refluxed over sodium and distilled
from the ketyl of benzophenone. Benzene was refluxed over
sodium and distilled. 5,10,15,20-Tetramesitylporphyrin
(H2TMP) was prepared by the method of Lindsey and co-
workers.15 Iron() tetramesitylporphyrin chloride [Fe(TMP)Cl]
was prepared by refluxing H2TMP in acetic acid containing
iron() chloride.16
Iron(III)
tetramesitylporphyrin
2,4,6-trimethylphenolate
solution of 2,4,6-tri-
[Fe(TMP)(OC6H2Me3-2,4,6)]. To
a
methylphenol (0.0689 g, 5.06 × 10Ϫ4 mol) in dry THF (10 cm3)
was added sodium (0.0112 g, 4.87 × 10Ϫ4 mol) and the mixture
allowed to react until all of the sodium had been consumed. A
portion of the phenolate solution (5 cm3) was then added to a
solution of [Fe(TMP)Cl] (0.0942 g, 1.08 × 10Ϫ4 mol) in dry
benzene. The mixture was refluxed for 2 h and the progress of
the reaction monitored by UV-Vis spectroscopy. At the end
of the reaction the solvent was removed under vacuum and the
resulting residue redissolved in dichloromethane, washed with
water, dried (Na2SO4), and evaporated to dryness. The crude
product was recrystallized from hot cyclohexane to give purple
crystals of [Fe(TMP)(OC6H2Me3-2,4,6)] (0.0945 g, 90%)
(Found: C, 79.90; H, 6.82. C65H63FeN4O requires C, 80.31; H,
6.53%).
References
1 H. B. Dunford, Adv. Inorg. Biochem., 1982, 4, 41.
2 Y. Watanabe and J. T. Groves, in The Enzymes, ed. D. S. Sigman,
Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1992, vol. 20, pp. 405–452.
3 G. R. Schonbaum and B. Chance, in The Enzymes, ed. P. D. Boyer,
Academic Press, New York, 1976, vol. 20, pp. 405–452.
4 T. L. Poulos, Adv. Inorg. Biochem., 1988, 7, 1.
5 J. T. Groves, R. C. Haushalter, M. Nakamura, T. E. Nemo and
B. J. Evans, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 2884.
6 J. T. Groves and Y. Watanabe, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 7834;
1988, 110, 8443.
7 A. X. Trautwein, E. Bill, E. L. Bominaar and H. Winkler, Struct.
Bonding (Berlin), 1991, 78, 1.
8 S. Hashimoto, Y. Mizutani, Y. Tatsuno and T. Kitagawa, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 6542.
9 Z. Gross and S. Nimri, Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33, 1731; J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1995, 117, 8021; K. Czarnecki, S. Nimri, Z. Gross, L. M.
Proniewicz and J. R. Kincaid, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 2929;
Z. Gross, S. Nimri, C. M. Barzilay and L. Simkhovich, J. Biol. Inorg.
Chem., 1997, 2, 492.
10 K.-J. Paeng, D.-H. Shin and I. R. Paeng, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36,
2901.
Other iron() tetramesitylporphyrin phenolate complexes
were prepared in a similar manner: iron() tetramesitylporphy-
rin 4-methoxyphenolate [Fe(TMP)(OC6H4OMe-4)] (Found:
C, 78.80; H, 6.56. C63H59FeN4O2 requires C, 78.82; H, 6.19%);
iron() tetramesitylporphyrin phenolate [Fe(TMP)(OPh)]
(Found: C, 80.07; H, 6.18. C62H57FeN4O requires C, 80.07; H,
6.18%); iron() tetramesitylporphyrin 4-trifluoromethylphenol-
ate [Fe(TMP)(OC6H4CF3-4)] (Found: C, 76.09; H, 6.19. C69H68-
F3FeN4O requires C, 76.58; H, 6.33%); iron() tetramesityl-
porphyrin 4-nitrophenolate [Fe(TMP)(OC6H4NO2-4)] (Found:
C, 76.47; H, 5.81. C62H56FeN5O3 requires C, 76.38; H, 5.79%).
11 T. Uno, K. Hatano, Y. Nishimura and Y. Arata, Inorg. Chem., 1990,
29, 2803.
12 T. B. McMahon and P. Kebarle, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99, 2222.
3376
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999, 3373–3377