Organogold(III) Iminophosphorane Complexes
reduced pressure to about 2 mL. Addition of 20 mL of Et2O
afforded 2 and 3 as yellow solids that were filtered and dried under
vacuum and used without further purification. 2: Yield: 0.224 g,
81%. Anal. Calcd for C27H25AuF6N2P2S2 (814.55): C, 39.81; H,
3.09; N, 3.44; S, 7.87; found: C, 39.90; H, 2.73; N, 3.77; S, 8.45.
that have allowed us to tune the lipophilicity/hydrophilicity
of the resulting compounds. The main advantage of the
iminophosphorane ligand is that it provides a C,N-backbone
that stabilizes the resulting square-planar cycloaurated com-
plexes. An extra advantage is that the P atom in the PR3
fragment can be used as a “spectroscopic marker” to study
the in vitro stability (and oxidation state) by 31P NMR. We
and others48,49 reported on the synthesis, characterization,
and catalytic activity (C-C and C-O bond formations) of
neutral [Au{κ2-C,N-C6H4(PPh2dN(C6H5)-2}Cl2] 1. This
compound displayed moderated cytotoxicity on a P388
murine leukemia cell line49 due mainly to lack of solubility
in biologically relevant solvents. We have prepared cationic
compounds soluble in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), mixtures
of DMSO/water, or water that have also displayed cytotox-
icity against HeLa human cervical carcinoma and Jurkat-T
acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells with preferential induc-
tion of apoptosis. We present here the results of the
interactions of these compounds with DNA and two model
proteins and the mechanistic implications derived from these
data.
MS(ESI+) [m/z, (%)]: 669 [M]+. IR: ν(N-CSS) ) 1562 cm-1
;
ν(C-S) 986 cm-1
.
31P{1H} NMR (d6-acetone) δ ) 65.7 (s); -144.1
1
(sept). H NMR (d6-acetone) δ ) 3.45 (s, 3H, Me), 3.62 (s, 3H,
Me); 7.06 (dt, 2H, H2+H6, NAr, 3JH-H ) 7.9, 4JH-H ) 4), 7.15 (td,
3
4
1H, H4, NAr, JH-H ) 7.8, JH-H ) 1.2), 7.26 (br t, 2H, H3+H5,
NAr, 3JH-H ) 7.9), 7.49 (dd, 1H, H3′, C6H4, 3JH-H ) 7.9, 3JP-H
)
3), 7.60-7.78 (m, 10H, Hp+Ho+Hm, PPh2), 7.89 (td, 1H, H4′, C6H4,
4
3
3JH-H ) 8 Hz, JP-H ) 2), 7.95 (dd, 1H, H5′, C6H4, JH-H ) 12,
5JP-H ) 1.5), 7.98 (br dd, 1H, H6′, C6H4, JH-H ) 12). 13C{1H}
3
NMR (d6-acetone) δ ) 40.03 (Me), 41.40 (Me), 124.90 (d, Ci, PPh2,
3
1JPC ) 92.5), 126.49 (br, C4, NAr), 128.71 (d, C6, NAr, JPC
)
5.5), 129.18 (s, C5, NAr), 129.19 (d, C4′, C6H4, 3JPC ) 13.5), 129.86
(d, Cm, PPh2, 3JPC ) 12.3), 130.22 (d, C3′, C6H4, 2JPC ) 12.8), 132.34
3
2
(d, C6′, C6H4, JPC ) 19.16); 134.02 (d, Co, PPh2, JPC ) 10.50);
4
4
134.62 (d, C5′, C6H4, JPC ) 2.54); 134.83 (d, Cp, PPh2, JPC
)
1
2.4); 137.48 (d, C2′, C6H4, JPC ) 128.8); 143.22 (br d, C1, NAr);
2
148.59 (d, C1, C6H4, JPC ) 17.2), 194.97 (NCS2). C3, NAr (not
seen). 31P{1H} NMR (d6-DMSO) δ ) 64.9 (s); -144.1 (sept). H
1
NMR (d6-DMSO) δ ) 3.20 (s, 3H, Me), 3.49 (s, 3H, Me); 6.97
(br d, 2H, H2+H6, NAr, 3JH-H ) 8), 7.05 (br t, 1H, H4, NAr, 3JH-H
Experimental Section
3
) 12), 7.19 (br t, 2H, H3+H5, NAr, JH-H ) 8), 7.43 (br dd, 1H,
H3′, C6H4, JH-H ) 8, 3JP-H ) 4), 7.58 (m, 1H, H5′, C6H4), 7.65-7.78
3
1. Synthesis and Characterization of the Gold(III)
complexes. Solvents were purified by use of a PureSolv purification
unit from Innovative Technology, Inc.; all other chemicals were
used as received. Elemental analyses were carried out by Atlantic
Microlab, Inc. (U.S.). Infrared spectra (4000-400 cm-1) were
recorded on a Nicolet 380 FT-IR infrared spectrophotometer on
(m, 8H, Hp+Ho, PPh2), 7.85 (m, 5H, Hm,, PPh2; H4′, C6H4; H6′,
C6H4).
3: Yield: 0.231 g, 60%. Anal. Calcd for C39H33AuF6N2P2S2
(966.73): C, 48.45; H, 3.44; N, 2.90; S, 6.63; found: C, 47.96; H,
3,31; N, 2.68; S, 6.44. MS(MALDI+) [m/z, (%)]:821.78 [M]+. IR:
1
KBr pellets. The H, 13C{1H}, and 31P{1H} NMR spectra were
ν(N-CSS) ) 1533 cm-1; ν(C-S) 983 cm-1
.
31P{1H} NMR (d6-
recorded in d6-acetone, d6-DMSO, or D2O solutions at 25 °C on a
Bruker 400 and spectrometer (δ, ppm; J, Hz); 1H and 13C{1H} were
referenced using the solvent signal as internal standard while
31P{1H} was externally referenced to H3PO4 (85%). The mass
spectra (electrospray ionization, ESI) were recorded from acetone
or water solutions by the mass spectrometry facility of the
University of California Riverside (U.S.). Compound 1 was
prepared as previously reported.48 The preparation of phosphine
P{Cp(m-C6H4-SO3Na)2} will be reported elsewhere. Calf Thymus
DNA, cytochrome c for heart horse, thioredoxin reductase from
Escherichia coli, DL-dithiothreitol (DTT), buffers, and solvents were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Spectrophotometric studies and
thermal denaturation experiments were performed on an Agilent
8453 diode-array spectrophotometer equipped with a HP 89090
Peltier temperature control accessory.
1
acetone) δ ) 66.2 (s); -144.1 (sept). H NMR (d6-acetone) δ )
5.08 (d, 4H, CH2, 2JH-H ) 36), 7.1 (td, br, 2H, H2+H6, NAr, 3JH-H
3
) 8), 7.15 (br, 1H, H4, NAr, JH-H ) 8), 7.30-7.80 (m, 15H,
3
Hp+Ho+Hm, PPh2, C6H5 Bz), 7.9 (td, br, 1H, H4′, C6H4, JH-H
)
8), 8.0 (q, 2H, H5′+H6′, C6H4). 13C{1H} NMR (d6-acetone) δ )
54.37 (Ph-CH2), 55.97 (Ph-CH2), 124.84 (d, Ci, PPh2, 1JPC ) 93.6),
3
126.64 (d, br, C6, NAr), 128.31 (d, C6, NAr, JPC ) 3.59), 128.86
3
(br, C5, NAr), 128.88 (d, C4′, C6H4, JPC ) 10.65); 129.14 (d, Cm,
3
PPh2, JPC ) 7.29), 129.24 (C4, Bz); 129.88 (d, C3′, C6H4,2JPC
2
)13.01); 130.28 (d, Co, PPh2, JPC ) 11.98); 132.47 (C6′, C6H4,
3JPC ) 13.53); 133.54 (C3,C5 Bz), 133.64, (C2, C6, Bz), 134.71 (d,
Cp, PPh2, 4JPC ) 2.9), 134.90 (d, C3, NAr, 2JPC ) 2.64); 137.33 (d,
1
C2′, C6H4, JPC ) 130.3), 143.17 (br d, C1, NAr), 146.96 (Ci, Bz),
2
148.26 (d, C1, C6H4, JPC ) 20.5), 198.96 (NCS2).31P{1H} NMR
1
(d6-DMSO) δ ) 65.6 (s); -144.1 (sept). H NMR (d6-DMSO) δ
1.1. [Au{K2-C,N-C6H4(PPh2dN(C6H5)-2}(S2CN-R2)]PF6 (R
) Me 2; Bz 3). To a solution of 1 (0.261 g, 0.34 mmol) in 40 mL
of MeOH was added Na[Me2NCS2] (0.657 g, 0.34 mmol) for the
preparation of 2 or Na[Bz2NCS2] (0.118 g, 0.34 mmol) for the
preparation of 3. The resulting mixture was stirred at room
temperature (RT) for 2 h, and a solution of NaPF6 (0.08 g, 0.5
mmol) in 7 mL of MeOH was added. The resulting suspension
was stirred at RT for 30 min and then filtered through celite (to
remove the NaCl formed). The resulting yellow solution was
concentrated under vacuum to dryness. The yellow residue was
extracted with 20 mL of acetone, and the solvent was reduced under
2
) 5.04 (d, 4H, CH2, JH-H ) 36), 6.97 (d, br, 2H, H2+H6, NAr,
3
3JH-H ) 8), 7.05 (t, br, 1H, H4, NAr, JH-H ) 8), 7.18 (t, br, 2H,
H3+H5, NAr, 3JH-H ) 12); 7.25 (d, br, 2H, 3JH-H ) 8), 7.30-7.48
(m, 10H, C6H5 Bz), 7.58 (m, 1H, H5′, C6H4), 7.64-7.75 (m, 8H,
Ho+Hm, PPh2), 7.82-7.91 (m, 6H, Hm,, PPh2; H4′, C6H4; H4′, C6H4;
H6′, C6H4).
1.2. [Au{K2-C,N-C6H4(PPh2dN(C6H5)-2}(PR3)nCl]PF6 (PR3
) P{Cp(m-C6H4-SO3Na)2} 4 n ) 1, TPA 5 n ) 2). 4: To a
solution of 1 (0.217 g, 0.35 mmol) in 20 mL of dry acetonitrile
was added AgPF6 (0.097 g, 0.385 mmol) in 5 mL of acetonitrile,
and the flask protected from light exposure. The reaction mixture
was stirred at RT for 30 min, and it was subsequently filtered
through celite (to remove AgCl). To the resulting yellow filtrate
was added P{Cp(m-C6H4-SO3Na)2} (0.136 g, 0.31 mmol) in a
mixture of 2 mL of acetonitrile and 0.5 mL of H2O at 0 °C. The
(48) Aguilar, D.; Contel, M.; Navarro, R.; Urriolabeitia, E. P. Organome-
tallics 2007, 26, 4604.
(49) Brown, S. D. J.; Henderson, W.; Kilpin, K. J.; Nicholson, B. K. Inorg.
Chim. Acta 2007, 360, 1310.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2009 1579