C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
2+
The large value of K3 indicates a stable C-S bond in [2ox2
]
.
“locked on” and “locked off” modes, multiple cycles could not be
realized. In fact, even C-S bond cleavage has been challenging.
Recently reported studies with mixed-ligand Mo-dithiolenes yield
partial ethylene release after reflux in chloroform for 21 h.22
Equilibrium binding of alkenes, including ethylene at low temper-
atures, to ReS4- has been noted by Goodman and Rauchfuss.23 In
our current system, the kinetics of C-S bond formation/cleavage
are much faster than those of metal-dithiolenes and allow facile
trap and release of ethylene over the period of several minutes at
258 K. Thermodynamic control coupled with rapid C-S bond
formation/cleavage are ideal for metal-assisted ethylene separation
as first proposed by Wang and Stiefel. Yet, our system is not subject
to the complications that hindered their original system.
2+
Solutions of [2ox2
]
were prepared by bulk oxidation of 1 under
an ethylene atmosphere via an ECE mechanism. In situ monitoring
+
of the electronic spectra, Figure S2, reveals oxidation of 1 to [1ox1
]
in the initial electrochemical step. In the chemical step [1ox1]+ adds
2+
ethylene yielding [2ox1]+, which is subsequently oxidized to [2ox2
]
to complete the ECE process. Once formed, the C-S bond cannot
be cleaved in this oxidation state. No significant changes in the
2+
UV-visible spectrum of [2ox2
]
are observed upon prolonged
standing at room temperature, N2 purging, or exposure to vacuum
via repeated cycles of freeze-pump-thaw. C-S bond cleavage is
only facilitated by reduction to [2ox1]+ or 2, which rapidly releases
ethylene to give 1.
In addition to electrochemical methods, [2ox2
2+
]
was prepared
Acknowledgment. The authors thank the Donors of the
American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (43917-AC3)
for support. M.S.M. thanks the Kentucky Research Challenge Trust
Fund for upgrade of our X-ray facilities.
by chemical oxidation (2.0 equiv of AgPF6) of 1 in ethylene
saturated solution. The structure of [2ox2][PF6]2 has been determined
by single-crystal X-ray techniques with details provided in the
Supporting Information.10-17 An ORTEP view of [2ox2
]
is
2+
presented in Figure 2 with selected bond distances and angles
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
voltammetry fitting parameters, cyclic voltammograms, and UV-visible
spectra in PDF format. X-ray structural data in CIF format. This material
provided in the figure caption.18
References
(1) Wang, K.; Stiefel, E. I. Science 2001, 291, 106–109.
(2) Harrison, D. J.; Nguyen, N.; Lough, A. J.; Fekl, U. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 11026–11027.
(3) Geiger, W. E. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 136–139.
(4) Grapperhaus, C. A.; Venna, K. B.; Mashuta, M. S. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46,
8044–8050.
(5) Poturovic, S.; Grapperhaus, C. A.; Mashuta, M. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 1883–1887.
(6) Dilworth, J. R.; Hutson, A. J.; Morton, S.; Harman, M.; Hursthouse, M. B.;
Zubieta, J.; Archer, C. M.; Kelly, J. D. Polyhedron 1992, 11, 2151–2155.
(7) Rudolph, M.; Feldberg, S. W. DigiSim, 3.03b; Bioanalytical Systems, Inc.:
West Lafayette, IN, 2004.
(8) Bond, A. L.; Oldham, K. B.; Snook, G. A. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 3492–
3496.
(9) Wasserscheid, P.; Hilgers, C.; Keim, W. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2004,
214, 83–90.
(10) SHELXTL (V6.14), Program Library for Structure Solution and Molecular
Graphics; Bruker Advanced X-ray Solutions, Inc.: Madison, WI, 2000.
(11) SAINT (V6.45a); Bruker Advanced X-ray Solutions, Inc.: Madison, WI,
2003.
(12) SMART (V.5632); Bruker Advanced X-ray Solutions, Inc.: Madison, WI,
2005.
(13) Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. 1990, A46, 467.
(14) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-97. Program for the Refinement of Crystal
Structures; University Gottingen: Gottingen, Germany, 1997.
(15) Sheldrick, G. M. SADABS (V2.10), Area Detector Absorption Correction;
University Gottingen: Gottingen, Germany, 2003.
Figure 2. ORTEP representation of [2ox2]
2+. Selected bond distances (Å):
Re(1)-S(1) 2.209(3); Re(1)-S(2) 2.435(3); Re(1)-S(3) 2.433(3); Re(1)-P(1)
2.420(3); Re(1)-P(2) 2.456(3); Re(1)-P(3) 2.465(3); C(55)–C(56) 1.499(14);
Selected bond angles (deg): S(1)-Re(1)-S(3) 170.00(9); P(1)-Re(1)-S(2)
174.01(9); P(2)-Re(1)-P(3) 162.68(9); S(3)-Re(1)-S(2) 84.37(10).
(16) Spek, A. L. SQUEEZE; University of Utrecht: Utrecht, The Netherlands,
1992.
(17) Crystal data for [2ox2][PF6]2: orange plate, monoclinic, space group C2/c,
a ) 29.009(18), b ) 22.577(18) Å, c ) 43.99(3) Å, ꢀ ) 96.182(17)°, V
) 28 643(35) Å3, Fcalcd ) 1.413 g/cm3, Z ) 8. Data were collected on a
Bruker SMART APEX CCD using Mo ΚR radiation. For all 25 546 unique
reflections (R(int) ) 0.073), the final anisotropic full-matrix least-squares
refinement on F2 for 822 variables converged at R1 ) 0.125, wR2 ) 0.184
with a GOF of 1.09. CCDC-699464 contains the supplementary crystal-
lographic data for this paper. Data can be obtained free of charge from
data_request.cif.
The stability of the C-S bonds as a function of oxidation state
was previously noted for Re (and Tc) complexes of 1,4,7-
trithiacylcononane.19 Theoretical investigations by Rothlisberger
related this effect to π-donation from a metal “t2g” orbital to a C-S
σ*.20,21 In our system, we propose similar changes in bonding are
responsible for the remarkably large changes in K as a function of
oxidation state and complex charge.
In summary, through the facile control of oxidation state by
electrochemical or chemical methods, ethylene can be in a “locked
on”, “locked off”, or in dynamic equilibrium with 1 or its oxidized
derivatives. The system is robust with no apparent changes in
efficiency after several cycles of C-S bond formation/cleavage.
Although metal-dithiolenes were previously reported to display
(18) Farrugia, L. J. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1997, 30, 565.
(19) Mullen, G. E. D.; Blower, P. J.; Price, D. J.; Powell, A. K.; Howard, M. J.;
Went, M. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 4093–4098.
(20) Magistrato, A.; Maurer, P.; Fassler, T.; Rothlisherger, U. J. Phys. Chem. A
2004, 108, 2008–2013.
(21) Maurer, P.; Magistrato, A.; Rothlisberger, U. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108,
11494–11499.
(22) Harrison, D. J.; Lough, A. J.; Nguyen, N.; Fekl, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2007, 46, 7644–7647.
(23) Goodman, J. T.; Rauchfuss, T. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5017–5022.
JA8086483
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 1, 2009 65