(E/Z ) 5/1) was synthesized from 25 (E/Z ) 5/1) in three
operations: (1) coupling with 262 with CuI to give protected
N-acyl enamine, (2) removal of C13, C15 acetate and O21
TIPS groups with NaOMe/MeOH, (3) acetylation of O21.
Enamide 27 cyclized smoothly under the PhI(OAc)2-medi-
ated cyclization reaction to give the cyclized product in a
total of 89% yield as a mixture of diastereomers. The mixture
of four pairs of diastereomers (C(8)-C(9) ) S,S; C(8)-C(9)
) R,R; C(8)-C(9) ) R,S; C(8)-C(9) ) S,R)15 was acety-
lated at C15 and debenzylated to give alcohols 28 and
epimers 28a-c which were carefully isolated through
extensive silica gel column chromatography and preparative
thin-layer chromatography (with a dr of 5:1 at C(8) and 1:1
at C(9)). The C1 terminal double bond was revealed by
converting 28 and 28a-c to the o-nitrophenyl selenides
followed by treatment with H2O2 at 50 °C.16 Upon treatment
with TBAF at 50 °C, a global deprotection was realized to
give the final products 29 and epimers 29a-c.
When we subjected compounds 29 and 29a-c to cell
proliferation studies in the HOP62 human lung cancer line,
compound 29 displayed extremely potent activity, and
gratifyingly, its epimers (29a-29c) showed improved activity
compared to its corresponding psymberin epimers. Com-
pound 29 was consistently 3-10-fold more potent than
psymberin across all cancer cell lines tested with IC50 values
in the subnanomolar ranges with epimer 29c showing
excellent activity against all cell lines tested, with IC50 values
in single digit nanomolar ranges (Table 3). These findings
potency. This finding may apply to all members of the
pederin family of natural products.
In conclusion, we have prepared a series of advanced
analogs of the antitumor natural product psymberin by
modification of the “psymberate” unsaturated side chain
using our novel PhI(OAc)2-mediated oxidative cyclization
method7 as the key step and tested them in various human
cancer cell lines. Our results suggest that substitution at C4
and C5 is important for the cytotoxicity of psymberin, but
the terminal double bond is not essential for activity. An
aryl group is a good replacement for the olefin. Diastereomers
at C(8) and C(9) constantly showed decreased activity
compared to their natural isomer. We finished the total
synthesis of C11-deoxypsymberin and discovered that this
compound is consistently more potent than the natural
product psymberin which may be true for the other members
of the psymberin/pederin family; this actually provides an
opportunity for further SAR studies in the psymberin and
pederin family. The activity of our synthetic psymberin is
consistent with that reported in the literature. This natural
product is extremely potent against all human cancer cell
lines tested but showed no selectivity between cell lines, and
its diastereomer (2) at C(8) and C(9) showed much decreased
activity. Preliminary mechanism studies suggest the mode
of action of psymberin is through cell apoptosis which is
therapeutically important. Further SAR studies of psymberin,
C11-deoxypsymberin, and the deoxy-pederin family of
natural products are in progress, and the results will be
reported in due course.
Acknowledgment. We thank Drs. Ismail Kola and John
Piwinski at SPRI for their strong support of the SPRI
postdoctoral program.
Table 3. Anticancer Activity of C11-Deoxypsymberin and Its
Epimersa
Supporting Information Available: Biological assay
protocol, apoptosis studies, experimental details, and spectral
data for all new compounds. This material is available free
29
29a
29b
29c
cell
human
(IC50 nM) (IC50 nM) (IC50 nM) (IC50 nM) line tissue type
OL802772S
0.265 ( 0.008 n.d.
0.149 ( 0.005 n.d.
0.034 ( 0.004 n.d.
0.055 ( 0.002 177 ( 6
0.142 ( 0.007 n.d.
0.076 ( 0.004 n.d.
0.073 ( 0.006 n.d.
0.160 ( 0.015 n.d.
0.066 ( 0.004 n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
8.7 ( 0.18 ACHN
5.9 ( 0.18 DU145
1.6 ( 0.27 H226
kidney
prostate
lung
(10) Mulzer, J.; Mantoulidis, A.; Ohler, E. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7456.
(11) Evans, D. A.; Allison, B. D.; Yang, M. G.; Masse, C. E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10840, and references cited therein.
(12) Evans, D. A.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5190.
(13) Relative stereohemistry at C(11), C(13), and C(15) was determined
by comparing with intermediate from the total synthesis of psymberin.
(14) Takai, K.; Nitta, K.; Utimoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
7408.
46 ( 7 3.0 ( 0.12 HOP62
lung
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
5.3 ( 0.15 MB231
breast
3.9 ( 0.48 MKN45 gastric
2.9 ( 0.21 PC3
prostate
colon
normal
6.1 ( 0.22 SW620
3.8 ( 0.10 NHDF
a The CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega,
Technical bulletin 288) was employed in this study. IC50 data are the mean
value of three experiments with statistical significance calculated.
(15) The C(8)- and C(9)-stereochemistry of final products were deter-
mined by 1H spectra comparison with synthetic psymberin and its epimers
which was assigned by 2D NOE NMR and proton-proton coupling between
N7, C8, and C9.
(16) (a) Bernardelli, P.; Moradei, O. M.; Friedrich, D.; Yang, J.; Gallou,
F.; Dyck, B. P.; Doskotch, R. W.; Lange, T.; Paquette, L. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 9021–9032. (b) Grieco, P. A.; Takigawa, T.; Schillinger,
W. J. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 2247.
should facilitate further SAR studies with psymberin since
it suggests that the C11-oxygen is not essential for good
870
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 4, 2009