266
Lipids (2011) 46:263–270
15.6 Hz, H-3 of 4S9R-form), 6.83 (0.13H, dd, J = 5.6,
15.6 Hz, H-3 of 4S9S-form), 7.39–7.43 (6H, m, H-ph),
7.50–7.53 (4H, m, H-ph).
dd, J = 4.8, 15.6 Hz, Ha-2), 2.70 (1H, dd, J = 8.4,
15.6 Hz, Hb-2), 3.54 (3H, m, OCH3), 3.57 (3H, m, OCH3),
3.66 (3H, s, CO2CH3), 5.11–5.17 (1H, m, H-11), 5.44–5.49
(1H, m, H-3), 7.38–7.40 (6H, m, H-ph), 7.53–7.54 (4H, m,
H-ph).
(-)-MTPA Ester of Methyl Ester of 4 (4a) 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz) d: 0.88 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, H3-10),
1.18–1.58 (12H, m, CH2 9 6), 2.58 (1H, dd, J = 4.8,
16.0 Hz, Ha-2), 2.65 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 16.0 Hz, Hb-2),
3.56 (3H, m, OCH3), 3.59 (3H, s, CO2CH3), 5.48 (1H, m,
H-3), 7.37–7.43 (3H, m, H-ph), 7.52–7.54 (2H, m, H-ph).
The ratio of R to S was determined by the intensity of
the signals arising from both enantiomers.
Results
(?)-MTPA Ester of Methyl Ester of 4 (4b) 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz) d: 0.87 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, H3-10),
1.20–1.67 (12H, m, CH2 9 6), 2.61 (1H, dd, J = 4.8,
16.0 Hz, Ha-2), 2.70 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 16.0 Hz, Hb-2),
3.55 (3H, m, OCH3), 3.66 (3H, s, CO2CH3), 5.48 (1H, m,
H-3), 7.37–7.41 (3H, m, H-ph), 7.52–7.54 (2H, m, H-ph).
The total lipid fraction obtained from lyophilized royal
jelly powder (1 kg) was separated repeatedly by silica gel
column chromatography with various solvents to give the
crude fatty acid fraction. This fraction was further sepa-
rated with HPLC, and seven compounds 1–7 were isolated
in pure form (see ‘‘Experimental Procedure’’).
Bis[(-)-MTPA] Ester of Methyl Ester of 5 (5a) 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 600 MHz) d: 1.25 (2H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, H3-10 of
3R9S-form), 1.33 (1H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, H3-10 of 3R9R-
form), 1.31–1.66 (10H, m, CH2 9 5), 2.55 (0.33H, dd,
J = 4.8, 16.2 Hz, Ha-2 of 3R9R-form), 2.56 (0.67H, dd, J =
4.8, 16.2 Hz, Ha-2 of 3R9S-form), 2.63 (0.33H, dd,
J = 7.8, 16.2 Hz, Hb-2 of 3R9R-form), 2.64 (0.67H, dd,
J = 7.8, 16.2 Hz, Hb-2 of 3R9S-form), 3.51–3.56 (6H, m,
OCH3 9 2), 3.59 (3H, m, CO2CH3), 5.10–5.14 (1H, m,
H-9), 5.43–5.48 (1H, m, H-3), 7.37–7.42 (6H, m, H-ph),
7.50–7.53 (4H, m, H-ph).
The molecular formula of 1, C10H18O4, was established
1
using high resolution FAB-MS. The H-NMR spectrum of
1 showed trans olefinic (dH 5.80 and 6.89), oxymethine (dH
3.57), and allylic (dH 2.21) groups together with non-
equivalent methylene signals. The 13C-NMR spectrum
showed one oxy methine (dC 73.1) and one oxy methylene
(dC 67.3) units together with carboxyl (dC 171.4) and
olefinic (dC 123.7 and 149.5) carbons. The COSY and
HMBC spectra showed significant correlation peaks
between H2-10/H-9, H-2/C-1, and H-3/C-1, respectively.
These findings revealed that 1 was 9,10-dihydroxy-2E-
decenoic acid. The absolute configuration of C-9 was
determined using the modified Mosher’s method.1
Bis[(?)-MTPA] Ester of Methyl Ester of 5 (5b) 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 600 MHz) d: 1.24 (1H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, H3-10 of
3R9R-form), 1.32 (2H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, H3-10 of 3R9S-
form), 1.11–1.65 (10H, m, CH2 9 5), 2.58 (0.67H, dd,
J = 4.8, 16.2 Hz, Ha-2 of 3R9S-form), 2.59 (0.33H, dd,
J = 4.8, 16.2 Hz, Ha-2 of 3R9R-form), 2.68 (0.67H, dd, J =
7.8, 16.2 Hz, Hb-2 of 3R9S-form), 2.69 (0.33H, dd,
J = 7.8, 16.2 Hz, Hb-2 of 3R9R-form), 3.53–3.56 (6H, m,
OCH3 9 2), 3.66 (3H, m, CO2CH3), 5.08–5.13 (1H, m,
H-9), 5.42–5.48 (1H, m, H-3), 7.36–7.40 (6H, m, H-ph),
7.51–7.54 (4H, m, H-ph).
Methylation of 1 with diazomethane, followed by
treatment with (-)-MTPA chloride gave the (-)-MTPA
ester (1a). The 1H-NMR spectrum of 1a showed two sets of
signals in a ratio of ca 3:1 due to optical isomers. The Dd
values [d (-)-MTPA ester – d (?)-MTPA ester] of the
major characteristic H-2 and H-3 protons were ?0.011 and
?0.013 ppm, respectively, whereas those of Ha-10 and
Hb-10 were -0.025 and -0.076 ppm, respectively, indi-
cating the 9R configuration. Hence, 1 was revealed to be a
mixture of 9R,10- and 9S,10-dihydroxy-2E-decenoic acids
in a ratio of ca 3:1 (Fig. 1).
The high resolution FAB-MS of 2 showed an [M-H]-
ion peak at m/z 201.1118, consistent with the same
molecular formula, C10H18O4, as that of 1, and indicating
that 2 is an isomer of 1. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 2
showed similar trans olefinic (dH 5.97 and 6.92) signals
due to protons H-2 and H-3, and equivalent H2-10 (dH
Bis[(-)-MTPA] Ester of Methyl Ester of 6 (6a) 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 600 MHz) d: 1.18–1.68 (14H, m, CH2 9 7), 1.25
(2.25H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H3-12 of 3R11S-form), 1.33
(0.75H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H3-12 of 3R11R-form), 2.57 (1H,
dd, J = 4.8, 15.6 Hz, Ha-2), 2.64 (1H, dd, J = 7.8,
15.6 Hz, Hb-2), 3.52 (3H, m, OCH3), 3.54 (3H, m, OCH3),
3.59 (3H, s, CO2CH3), 5.11–5.16 (1H, m, H-11), 5.45–5.49
(1H, m, H-3), 7.38–7.41 (6H, m, H-ph), 7.52–7.53 (4H, m,
H-ph).
1
Bis[(?)-MTPA] Ester of Methyl Ester of 6 (6b) 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 600 MHz) dH: 1.38–1.65 (14H, m, CH2 9 7), 1.25
(0.75H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H3-12 of 3R,11R-form), 1.33
(2.25H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H3-12 of 3R11S-form), 2.61 (1H,
To establish whether the modified Mosher’s method is applicable to
compounds possessing a 1,2-diol, we firstly examined this method
using 3-(octadecyloxy)-1,2S-propanediol. The Dd values of the
corresponding (-)- and (?)-MTPA esters were consistent with those
predicted for S configuration.
123