A. F. Suleymanova et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 5293–5296
5295
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Richardson, F. S. Chem. Rev. 1982, 82, 541.
2. Parker, D.; Yu, J. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3141.
3. Weibel, N.; Charbonnière, L. J.; Guardigli, M.; Roda, A.; Ziessel, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 4888.
4. Bakker, B. H.; Goes, M.; Hoebe, N.; Van Ramesdonk, H. J.; Verhoeven, J. W.;
Werts, M. H. V.; Hofstaat, J. W. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 208, 3.
5. Diamandis, E. P. Analyst 1879, 1992, 117.
6. Lo, K. K.-W.; Hui, W.-K.; Chung, C.-K.; Tsang, K. H.-K.; Ng, D. C.-M.; Zhu, N.;
Cheung, K.-K. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 1434.
7. Wieczorek, B.; Lemcke, B.; Dijkstra, H. P.; Egmond, M. R.; Klein Gebbink, R. J. M.;
VanKoten, G. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 1929.
Figure 1. Absorption and emission spectra of
solution.
2 in aerated dichloromethane
8. Lo, K. K.-W.; Leung, S.-K.; Pan, C.-Y. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2012, 380, 343.
9. Armelao, L.; Quici, S.; Barigelletti, F.; Accorsi, G.; Bottaro, G.; Cavazzini, M.;
Tondello, E. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 487.
10. Pandya, S.; Yu, J.; Parker, D. Dalton Trans. 2006, 2757.
11. Donnio, B.; Williams, J. A. G.; Bruce, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5248.
12. Prokhorov, A. M.; Slepukhin, P. A.; Rusinov, V. L.; Kalinin, V. N.; Kozhevnikov, D.
N. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7713.
13. Lo, K. K.-W.; Ng, D. C.-M.; Chung, C.-K. Organometallics 2001, 20, 4999.
14. Brooks, J.; Babayan, Y.; Lamansky, S.; Djurovich, P. I.; Tsyba, I.; Bau, R.;
Thompson, M. E. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3055.
Table 1
Photophysical parameters of 2
a
c
d
kabs (nm)
eb (dm3 molꢁ1 cmꢁ1
)
kem (nm)
Uem
237
320
415
8793
8594
3500
597
0.01
15. Kozhevnikov, D. N.; Kozhevnikov, V. N.; Ustinova, M. M.; Santoro, A.; Bruce, D.
W.; Koenig, B.; Czerwieniec, R.; Fischer, T.; Zabel, M.; Yersin, H. Inorg. Chem.
2008, 48, 4179.
16. Prokhorov, A. M.; Santoro, A.; Williams, J. A. G.; Bruce, D. W. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2012, 51, 95.
a
b
c
kabs — absorption band maximum, in aerated CH2Cl2 solution at 298 K.
— molar absorptivity ( 5%).
kem — emission maximum, in aerated CH2Cl2 solution at 298 K.
e
d
Uem — photoluminescence quantum yield relative to Ru(bipy)3Cl2 in aerated
water solution ( 20%).31
17. Anderson, G. W.; Zimmerman, J. E.; Callahan, F. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1839, 1964,
86.
18. Raw, S. A., Taylor, R. J., Katritzky, A. R., Eds.Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry;
Academic Press: Oxford, 2010; Vol. 100, p 75.
19. Stanforth, S. P.; Tarbit, B.; Watson, M. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 693.
20. Hajbi, Y.; Suzenet, F.; Khouili, M.; Lazar, S.; Guillaumet, G. Tetrahedron 2007, 63,
8286.
21. Prokhorov, A. M.; Kozhevnikov, V. N.; Kopchuk, D. S.; Bernard, H.; Le Bris, N.;
Tripier, R.; Handel, H.; Koenig, B.; Kozhevnikov, D. N. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 597.
22. Kozhevnikov, D. N.; Kozhevnikov, V. N.; Shafikov, M. Z.; Prokhorov, A. M.;
Bruce, D. W.; Williams, J. A. G. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 3804.
23. Prokhorov, A. M.; Slepukhin, P. A.; Rusinov, V. L.; Kalinin, V. N.; Kozhevnikov, D.
N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 3785.
24. Kozhevnikov, D. N.; Kozhevnikov, V. N.; Prokhorov, A. M.; Ustinova, M. M.;
Rusinov, V. L.; Chupakhin, O. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 869.
25. Stanforth, S. P.; Tarbit, B.; Watson, M. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6015.
26. Kozhevnikov, V. N.; Ustinova, M. M.; Slepukhin, P. A.; Santoro, A.; Bruce, D. W.;
Kozhevnikov, D. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 4096–4098.
27. Preparation of ligand 8: The starting phenol 7 (600 mg, 2.37 mmol) and K2CO3
(3.2 g, 23.68 mmol) were suspended in MeCN (35 mL) and ethyl bromoacetate
(435 mg, 2.6 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred for 10 h at reflux. The
solvent was removed, H2O (50 mL) was added to the residue, and the white
data are collected in Table 1. The absorption spectrum is typical for
cyclometallated arylpyridine complexes of platinum(II).14 The
moderate absorption band at 415 nm was assigned to a metal-to-
ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transition. More intense absorption
bands at 280–320 nm corresponded to ligand-centered (LC)
p, -
p⁄
transitions. Upon photoexcitation at the lowest energy band, the
complex was moderately emissive in aerated CH2Cl2 solution at
room temperature and exhibited orange luminescence with a
Stokes shift of about 180 nm. The emission band at 597 nm showed
some resolved vibrational modes with 1200 cmꢁ1 progression.
Based on previous studies of complexes of this type, the emission
origin was assumed to be a result of ligand-centered 3p p⁄-transi-
,
tion from a triplet state.15 The emission lifetime in ambient condi-
tions corresponds to tens of microseconds. The quantum yield of
the phosphorescence was about 0.01 at room temperature in aer-
ated CH2Cl2 solution.
solid product
8 was filtered and recrystallized from EtOH. Yield 750 mg,
2.2 mmol, 93%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): 1.30 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Et), 4.27
(q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, Et), 4.65 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.99 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.11 (dd, J1 = 4.8 Hz,
J2 = 3.7 Hz, 1H, thienyl), 7.38 (dd, J1 = 4.8 Hz, J2 = 1.1 Hz, 1H, thienyl), 7.51 (m,
2H, Ar), 7.58 (dd, J1 = 3.7 Hz, J2 = 1.1 Hz, 1H, thienyl), 7.67 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, Py),
7.81 (d, J1 = 8.2 Hz, J2 = 2.2 Hz, 1H, Py), 8.74 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H, Py). Found: C,
67.15; H, 5.01; N, 3.95. Calcd for C19H17NO3S: C, 67.24; H, 5.05; N, 4.13.
28. Preparation of complex 10: The starting ligand 8 (750 mg, 2.2 mmol) was
suspended in MeCN and pulverized potassium tetrachloroplatinate powder
(917 mg, 2.2 mmol) was added with vigorous stirring. The mixture was stirred
and refluxed for 2 d. The solvent was removed and the resulting complex 9 was
treated with 3 ml of DMSO. The mixture was heated for 5 min at reflux, and
then the DMSO was removed under vacuum. The residue was dissolved in
acetone (50 mL) and sodium acetylacetonate (3.1 g, 22.10 mmol) was added,
and the suspension stirred under reflux for 5 h. The solvent was removed, and
the product 10 was isolated by column chromatography on silica with CH2Cl2
as the eluent. The crude product was recrystallized from acetone to give orange
crystals of 10. Yield 680 mg, 1.07 mmol, 49%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm):
1.31 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Et), 1.97 (s, 3H, acac), 1.99 (s, 3H, acac), 4.28 (q, J = 7.1 Hz,
2H, Et), 4.67 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.48 (s, 1H, acac), 7.00 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.19 (d, J = 4.5 Hz,
1H, thienyl), 7.31 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, Py), 7.49 (m, 3H, Ar + thienyl), 7.82 (d,
J1 = 8.2 Hz, J2 = 2.2 Hz, 1H, Py), 9.00 (dd, J = 2.2 Hz, JHPt = 43 Hz, 1H, Py). HRMS
(ESI): C24H23NO5PtS requires M+H, 633.1023, found 633.1082.
In conclusion, an efficient and straightforward ‘1,2,4-triazine’
methodology for the synthesis of a pyridine ligand has been success-
fully applied for the preparation of a luminescent cyclometallated
platinum(II) labeling agent. The methodology allows easy construc-
tion of the platinum(II) luminophore bearing an NHS-activated car-
boxylic group for peptide binding, starting from readily available
reagents in a few steps. The key step is the preparation of an appro-
priately substituted cyclometallating pyridine ligand via the corre-
sponding 1,2,4-triazine. The preliminary results revealed that the
luminophore 2 prepared in this way was a ‘ready-to-go’ luminescent
label, which can be excited with cheap lasers and possesses suffi-
ciently intense long-lived luminescence with a strong Stokes shift
for time-resolved detection. Further studies of bioconjugation and
luminescent visualization are in progress.
29. Preparation of complex 11: Complex 10 (198 mg, 0.312 mmol) was suspended
in THF (2.5 mL) and 1 N aq LiOH solution was added. The mixture was refluxed
for 10 h. The solvents were condensed in vacuo, and the solids filtered. The
remaining solution was acidified with 1 N HCl to pH 1–2. A yellow precipitate
of 11 was formed and removed by filtration. This was dried and used for next
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Ural Federal University and the President of
Russian Federation (grant MR-1103.2012.3) for financial support.