New reagents for the reductive quenching of ozonolysis reactions

Article abstract of DOI:10.1080/00397919508015494

3,3'-Thiodipropionic acid and its salts were found to be effective reductive quench reagents in the ozonolysis of olefins. They were as effective as methyl sulfide without its drawbacks. A polymer-bound form of 3,3'-thiopropionic acid were also effective.

Full text of DOI:10.1080/00397919508015494

This article was downloaded by: [North Carolina State University]
On: 03 September 2013, At: 11:19
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954
Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,
UK
Synthetic Communications: An
International Journal for Rapid
Communication of Synthetic
Organic Chemistry
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lsyc20
New Reagents for the
Reductive Quenching of
Ozonolysis Reactions
R. B. Appell a , I. A. Tomlinson a & I. Hill a b
a The Dow Chemical Company Pharmaceuticals
Process Research, 1710 Bldg, Midland, MI, 48674
b School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0400
Published online: 23 Sep 2006.
To cite this article: R. B. Appell , I. A. Tomlinson & I. Hill (1995) New Reagents for
the Reductive Quenching of Ozonolysis Reactions, Synthetic Communications: An
International Journal for Rapid Communication of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 25:22,
3589-3595, DOI: 10.1080/00397919508015494
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00397919508015494
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,
or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views
expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the
Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with

primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any
losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,
and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the
Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,
sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is
expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions