Mao et al.
JOCNote
TABLE 1. Evaluation of Potential Catalyst and Solventa
TABLE 2. Decarboxylative Amination of 2-Carboxyindoline with
Various Aldehydesa
entry
R
4
yield (%)b
entry
catalyst
b
solvent
toluene
toluene
EtOH
water
THF
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
time (h)
4a yieldc (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20c
4-MeOC6H4
4-MeC6H4
4-N(Me)2C6H4
2-MeOC6H4
2-MOMOC6H4
C6H5
4-FC6H4
2-FC6H4
4-ClC6H4
2-ClC6H4
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
4g
4h
4i
74
70
64
72
62
78
75
72
78
75
76
73
82
80
69
81
79
80
69
65
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-
24
24
24
30
24
24
24
24
24
24
trace
45
20
trace
trace
67
55
60
50
74
PhCOOH
PhCOOH
PhCOOH
PhCOOH
PhCOOH
AcOH
TFA
p-TsOH
PhCOOH
9
4j
4k
4l
10d
4-BrC6H4
2-BrC6H4
aAll the reactions were conducted with 2-carboxyindoline (1.5 equiv,
0.75 mmol), p-anisaldehyde (1 equiv, 0.5 mmol), and catalyst (0.2 equiv,
0.1 mmol) in 3 mL of solvent under reflux in nitrogen atmosphere. bNo
catalyst was used. cIsolated yield of the corresponding product. d4 A MS
(20 mg) was added.
4-NO2C6H4
3-NO2C6H4
4-CF3C6H4
2-pyridinyl
2-furanyl
2-thiophenyl
1-naphthylc
9-anthracenylc
4m
4n
4o
4p
4q
4r
4s
4t
Treatment of a mixture of 2-carboxyindoline9 and p-
anisaldehyde in toluene under reflux in the absence of
catalyst afforded little product (Table 1, entry 1). Addition
of benzoic acid (0.2 eqiv) to the reaction led to formation of
the desired product with 45% yield (Table 1, entry 2). Since
the result did not seem so satisfactory, we then began to study
the solvent effect, and 1,4-dioxane was found to be the best
medium compared with toluene, EtOH, water, and THF
(Table 1, entries 2-6). In addition, different Brønsted acids
were also evaluated as catalysts for the reaction and benzoic
acid was shown to be the optimal catalyst (Table 1, entries
6-9). It was interesting to find that addition of 4 A MS gave
a higher yield (Table 1, entry 10).
aAll the reactions were conducted with 2-carboxyindoline (1.5 equiv,
0.75 mmol), aldehyde (1 equiv, 0.5 mmol), PhCOOH (0.2 equiv,
0.1 mmol), and 4 A MS (20 mg) in 3 mL of 1,4-dioxane under reflux
in nitrogen atmosphere. bIsolated yield of the corresponding product.
c2-Carboxyindoline (0.9 mmol) was added.
SCHEME 1. Decarboxylative Redox Amination of Phthalal-
dehydes
With the optimal conditions in hand, we then began to
explore the substrate scope of this reaction. As shown in
Table 2, a variety of aromatic aldehydes bearing various
types of substituents were employed in the reaction to give
the corresponding products with moderate to good yields
(Table 2, entries 1-15). Notably, the aldehyde substrates
with electron-donating groups on the aromatic ring af-
forded a little lower yields (Table 2, entries 1-5). The
benzaldehyde formed N-benzylindole with 78% yield
(Table 2, enrtry 6). Moveover, the heteroaromatic alde-
hydes also could react with 2-carboxyindoline with satis-
factory yields (Table 2, entries 16-18). Finally, we focused
on the reaction of 1-naphthaldehyde and 9-anthraldehyde.
To our delight, 69% and 65% yield were obtained, respec-
tively (Table 2, entries 19 and 20). While aliphatic aldehydes
were employed, no desired product was observed.
Having established the scope of this reaction, we then
turned our attention to the decarboxylative redox amination
of phthalaldehydes. It was satisfying to find that p-phthal-
aldehyde and o-phthalaldehyde reacted with 2-carboxyindo-
line (3 equiv) smoothly to afford the corresponding prod-
ucts, albeit with longer time and lower yields (Scheme 1).
According to the reaction results and related research,2,5
we proposed a mechanism for the decarboxylative redox
amination based on the formation of azomethine ylide. As
shown in Scheme 2, in the presence of an acid, direct
condensation of aldehyde 6 with 2-carboxyindoline 5 pro-
duces oxazolidin-5-one A,5 which is subsequently converted
to azomethine ylide B by releasing one molecular CO2.
Protonation of azomethine ylide results in the formation
of the iminium ion pair C and D. Deprotonation of the
(8) (a) Willis, M. C.; Brace, G. N.; Findlay, T. J. K.; Holmesb, I. P. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 851. (b) Ackermann, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 439.
(c) Barluenga, J.; Aquino, A. J.; Aznar, F.; Valdes, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 4031. (d) Willis, M. C.; Brace, G. N.; Holmes, I. P. Angew. Chem.
2005, 117, 407. (e) Bahn, S.; Imm, S.; Mevius, K.; Neubert, L.; Tillack, A.;
Williams, J. M. J.; Beller, M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 3590.
(9) For the synthesis of 2-carboxyindolines, see: (a) Viswanathan, R.;
Prabhakaran, E. N.; Plotkin, M. A.; Johnston, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 163. (b) Gademann, K.; Bethuel, Y.; Locher, H. H.; Hubschwerle, C. J.
Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8361. (c) Liu, J.; Qian, C.; Chen, X. Synthesis 2010, 3,
403.
1168 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 76, No. 4, 2011