Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
di-tert-butyl-4-methyl-pyridine additive on the reaction effi-
sugars, natural products, nucleosides, and marketed drugs
ciency and quantum yield, and iii) a novel reaction mecha-
nism of aroyl chlorination of alkenes.
bearing functional groups such as free hydroxy groups,
tertiary amines, alkyl alkenes, acetal and triethylsilyl protect-
ing groups, oxetane, ketones, and heteroaromatics were
successfully aroylated to afford the desired products (4ae–
al) in 48–80% yields and with excellent levels of chemo-,
regio-, and diastereoselectivity. It is noteworthy that prepa-
ration of these complex aryl enones by the cross-metathesis
protocol is challenging because of i) the instability and limited
availability of aryl vinyl ketones and ii) the difficulty in
distinguishing between two different terminal alkenes (4ak).
Thus, our strategy is complementary to the cross-metathesis.
To illustrate the synthetic utility of the enone products for
preparation of useful molecular scaffolds, we derivatized the
products under various reaction conditions (Scheme 2).
After a systematic variation of different reaction param-
eters, such as additives, solvents, photoredox catalysts,
concentrations, and stoichiometries, we were pleased to
identify optimal reaction conditions in which a mixture of 4-
fluorobenzoyl chloride (1b, 1.50 equiv), 1,1-diphenyl-ethyl-
ene (2am, 1.00 equiv), fac-Ir(ppy)3 {fac-tris[2-phenylpyridi-
nato-C2,N]iridium(III), 1.00 mol%}, and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-
methyl-pyridine (1.20 equiv) in CHCl3 (0.100m) at 238C with
irradiation by a blue LED light for 16 hours afforded the
desired product 3b in 85% yield upon isolation (Table 1).[21]
Although aliphatic acyl chlorides failed to react under these
reaction conditions, a diverse set of aroyl chlorides was
successfully coupled to afford the desired enone products
(Table 1a). For example, electron-neutral (1a, 1r–s), elec-
tron-rich (1j–m), and electron-poor (1i, 1n–q) aroyl chlorides
reacted well under these reaction conditions, affording the
desired enones in 46–96% yields. Different halogen function-
alities (1b–h), in particular, Br and I, survived the reaction,
and provide synthetic handles for further structural elabo-
ration through metal-catalyzed coupling reactions. The reac-
tion tolerated o-, m-, and p-substituted aroyl chlorides (1d–f).
Substrates bearing extended p-systems (1r, 1s) and hetero-
arenes such as thiophene (1t) and furan (1u) reacted
smoothly, providing the desired products in 55–89% yields.
We next directed our attention to examine the scope with
respect to the alkenes and found that a wide range of mono-
and disubstituted alkenes participate in this coupling reaction,
affording the desired enones in modest to good yields
(Table 1b). For example, various styrenes, regardless of
their electronics (2a–h, 2m–t, 2v, 2x, 2aa), were viable
substrates. Alkenes substituted with biologically important
heteroarenes such as thiophene (2i), thiazole (2j), quinoline
(2k), furan (2l), pyridine (2r–s), benzofuran (2r), and indole
(2s) were compatible under the optimized reaction condi-
tions. Both 1,2- and 1,1-disubstituted (hetero)aryl alkenes
(2m–t, 2v) reacted to give the desired trisubstituted enones in
yields of 51–82%. The E and Z diastereoselectivity of the
resulting enones is determined by the sterics of the alkene
substituents. While alkenes with sterically distinct substitu-
ents afforded one diastereomer (2n, 2t) exclusively, alkenes
with substituents of similar sizes gave a mixture of diastereo-
mers (1–1.3:1, 2o–s). Most of the monosubstituted alkenes
afforded the desired products as a single diastereomer.
Although aliphatic alkenes afforded only trace amounts of
the desired products, our method was successfully applied to
other alkene derivatives such as an enyne (2u), a diene (2v),
mono- and disubstituted a,b-unsaturated esters (2w–aa),
acyclic (2ab) and cyclic (2ac) enones, and acrylonitrile
(2ad) to furnish the corresponding products in 43–89%
yields. More importantly, the protocol allows straightforward
and selective syntheses of molecular scaffolds (e.g., 4m, 4n,
4t, 4v, 4ac) that are otherwise difficult to access.
Scheme 2. Synthetic utility of the enone products. M.S.=molecular
sieves, THF=tetrahydrofuran.
Treatment of 4t, an enone derivative that is difficult to
prepare otherwise, with the Febuxostat-derivative 5 under
Suzuki coupling reaction conditions afforded the desired
product 6 in 43% yield with 2:1 E/Z ratio. Under redox
annulation reaction conditions, the chalcone 4a’ coupled with
pyrrolidine and tetrahydroisoquinoline, forming the cyclic
amines 7 and 8, respectively, in modest yields.[22] The enone
4m underwent epoxidation smoothly to afford the desired
product 9 in 78% yield.
It is noteworthy that the 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methyl-pyri-
dine additive is critical for the success of the reaction. We
conducted a series of experiments to understand the role of
2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methyl-pyridine additive. First, Stern–
Volmer experiments revealed that aroyl chlorides quench
excited fac-*Ir(ppy)3 photocatalysts but alkenes and 2,6-di-
tert-butyl-4-methyl-pyridine do not. Interestingly, the pres-
ence of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methyl-pyridine enhanced the
quenching constant of aroyl chlorides from 9.89 ꢀ 108 mÀ1 sÀ1
To demonstrate the amenability of the photocatalytic
alkene aroylation process to late-stage synthetic applications,
drug-like molecules were subjected to the standard reaction
conditions (Table 1c). For example, derivatives of peptides,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 1 – 7
ꢀ 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!