ChemComm
Communication
Table 2 (continued )
(entries 17 and 18). It is worthwhile to point out that the present
C–H activation–carbonylation is not compatible with substrates
equipped with a methyl group on Ar1—no desired CO insertion
spots were observed by TLC analysis (entries 19 and 20). The benzylic
C–H bonds of these substrates could be easily activated followed by
CO insertion and reductive elimination with another 2-arylphenol to
give esters. Repetitiously the intermolecular process will give poly-
meric species. The present catalytic reaction was applicable to
substrates with Ar2 of the 2-naphthyl moiety to give substituted
6H-naphtho[2,3-c]chromen-6-ones in good yields regioselectively
(entries 21 and 22). Furthermore, the reaction of 1-phenylnaphtha-
lene-2-ol (1w) with CO proceeded effectively to give 2w in 75% yield
(entry 23). Finally, difluoro-substituted 2-arylphenols did not pro-
duce the expected CO insertion products likely due to the instability
of the intermediates having more electron-withdrawing groups on
the phenol ring in the catalytic process (entries 24 and 25).
Entry
17
Substrate 1
Product 2
Yieldb (%)
75
18
19
85
—
In conclusion, we have demonstrated an efficient Pd-catalyzed
oxidative carbonylation of 2-arylphenols via one O–H and C–H bond
cleavage, and one new C–C and C–O bond formation under mild
conditions with tolerance of a variety of substrates in good yields.
We thank the National Science Council of Taiwan, NCTU
and NTHU for financial support of this research.
20
21
22
—
72
74
Notes and references
1 (a) K. M. Engle, T.-S. Mei, M. Wasa and J.-Q. Yu, Acc. Chem. Res., 2012,
45, 788; (b) G. Song, F. Wang and X. Li, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 3651;
(c) K. Chen, F. Hu, S.-Q. Zhang and B.-F. Shi, Chem. Sci., 2013, 4, 3906.
2 (a) X.-F. Wu, H. Neumann and M. Beller, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113, 1;
(b) C. Jia, T. Kitamura and Y. Fujiwara, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 633.
3 E. J. Yoo, M. Wasa and J.-Q. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 17378.
4 (a) S. Inoue, H. Shiota, Y. Fukumoto and N. Chatani, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2009, 131, 6898; (b) Y. Du, T. K. Hyster and T. Rovis, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 12074; (c) J. W. Wrigglesworth, B. Cox, G. C.
Lloyd-Jones and K. I. Booker-Milburn, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 5326.
5 H. Zhang, R. Shi, P. Gan, C. Liu, A. Ding, Q. Wang and A. Lei, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 5204.
23
24
75
—
—
6 J.-C. Wan, J.-M. Huang, Y.-H. Jhan and J.-C. Hsieh, Org. Lett., 2013,
15, 2742.
25
7 W. C. P. Tsang, N. Zheng and S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005,
127, 14560.
8 (a) B. Xiao, T.-J. Gong, Z.-J. Liu, J.-H. Liu, D.-F. Luo, J. Xu and L. Liu,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 9250; (b) J. A. Jordan-Hore, C. C. C.
Johansson, M. Gulias, E. M. Beck and M. J. Gaunt, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 16184.
a
All reactions were carried out with substrate 1 (50 mg), Pd(OAc)2
(10 mol%), and AgOAc (3 equiv.) in 4 mL of anhydrous CH3CN at 80 1C
b
for 48 h under CO in freshly distilled CH3CN. Isolated yields.
9 (a) D.-D. Liang, Z.-W. Hu, J.-L. Peng, J.-B. Huang and Q. Zhu, Chem.
Commun., 2013, 49, 173; (b) Z. Liang, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, K. Wang and
Y. Zhang, Tetrahedron, 2013, 69, 6519; (c) J. Albert, L. D’Andrea,
J. Granell, J. Zafrilla, M. Font-Bardia and X. Solans, J. Organomet.
Chem., 2007, 692, 4895.
10 V. Rajeshkumar, F.-W. Chan and S.-C. Chuang, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
2012, 354, 2473.
Ar2 ring underwent the expected oxidative carbonylation reaction
regioselectively to generate benzopyranones 2b–d, respectively, in
70–87% yields (Table 2, entries 2–4). This reaction was also applied
to substrates 1 with a chloro substituent on Ar2 (entry 5) and
heterocycles such as 2-furyl and 2-thienyl on Ar2 (entries 6 and 7).
In addition, benzopyranone 2h with a 3,4-methylenedioxy moiety
can be prepared in 68% yield (entry 8). Compound 2h was prepared
11 V. Rajeshkumar, T.-H. Lee and S.-C. Chuang, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 1468.
12 J. B. Harborne, The Flavonoids: The Advances in Research since 1986,
Chapman & Hall, London, 1994.
previously in five steps from D-ribose.20 Our interest in understand- 13 I. Hussain, V. T. H. Nguyen, M. A. Yawer, T. T. Dang, C. Fischer,
H. Reinke and P. Langer, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 6255.
14 C.-L. Sun, Y.-F. Gu, W.-P. Huang and Z.-J. Shi, Chem. Commun., 2011,
ing the chemical reactivity of 1 with other EDG or EWG groups on
the Ar1 ring prompts us to prepare substrates 1i–v. The examples
47, 9813.
with an electron-withdrawing fluoro group at the 3 (entries 9–12) or 15 N. Thasana, R. Worayuthakarn, P. Kradanrat, E. Hohn, L. Young and
S. Ruchirawat, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 9379.
16 K. Vishnumurthy and A. Makriyannis, J. Comb. Chem., 2010, 12, 664.
17 Q. J. Zhou, K. Worm and R. E. Dolle, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 5147.
the 4 (entries 13–16) position of Ar1 all underwent oxidative CO
insertion to give 2i–p in 65–87% yields. This indicated that a fluoro
group on Ar1 does not influence the chemical reactivity for CO 18 K. Inamoto, J. Kadokawa and Y. Kondo, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 3962.
19 S. Luo, F.-X. Luo, X.-S. Zhang and Z.-J. Shi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
insertion. We then found that substrates 1q–r with a chloro moiety
at the 4 position of Ar1 also reacted smoothly with CO to give
2013, 52, 10598.
20 A. E. Håkansson, A. Palmelund, H. Holm and R. Madsen, Chem.–Eur.
the expected products 2q–r, respectively, in 75–85% yields
J., 2006, 12, 3243.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 11797--11799 11799