However, we were able to obtain good inhibition of PTPA
with an IC50 value of 39 mM (12), indicating that cinnamic acid
based tripeptides are promising reversible inhibitors for
bacterial PTPs. In addition, pre-incubation of PTPA and
PTPB with a 100-fold excess of CAC compound 12 and
subsequent incubation with 10 mM CA probe 10 resulted in
strongly reduced labelling for PTPB and a significant reduc-
tion for PTPA, providing further confirmation that both
probes compete for the same active site (Fig. 3B).
mutation of Cys171 to alanine. As expected, the mutant
enzyme revealed no probe labelling (Fig. 4C). Probes 7 and
10 exhibited the best labelling intensities of SsaA2 while probe
1 showed no labelling, indicating that the enzyme does not
prefer two adjacent Gly residues next to the CA group. This
information could be useful to gain insight into the native
substrate preferences of this uncharacterized virulence
associated protein. To estimate the strength of probe–protein
interactions, we compared the reactivity profile of 10 with
SsaA2 across a concentration range from 100 to 0.2 mM
(Fig. 4D). The protein can still be detected at concentra-
tions as low as 1 mM, which indicates an affinity suitable
for monitoring the function and activity of this putatively
important enzyme in future studies.
The previous experiments validated the utility of CA probes
to label and inhibit recombinant bacterial phosphatases. Based
on these results we wanted to test if the probes were capable of
labelling enzymes in whole bacterial proteome lysates. For an
initial evaluation we chose to analyse the labelling pattern of
our library in a proteome of the antibiotic resistant MRSA
strain. Enzymes which are labelled in MRSA proteomes could
be involved in pathogenesis and resistance and may represent
valuable targets for therapeutic interventions.
In conclusion, we utilized cinnamic aldehyde as a proto-
type Michael acceptor system for the activity based labelling
of pathogenesis associated enzymes including phosphatases
as well as a secretory antigen from MRSA. Based on our
library approach we were able to identify substrate preferences
of individual uncharacterized enzymes which may help to
guide the design of specific inhibitors. These findings illustrate
that our Michael acceptor based natural product derived
probes are useful, selective and sensitive chemical tools for
the identification and characterization of physiologically and
pathologically relevant enzymes in complex proteomes.
We thank Prof. T. Carell for his generous support and
acknowledge funding by the DFG Emmy Noether program
We therefore used a selection of our best probes to profile
the MRSA membrane proteome. Although we were not able
to detect PTPA and PTPB which may be less abundant or
inactive under the test conditions, one new protein target was
selectively labelled (Fig. 4A). Subsequent identification by
LC-MS analysis revealed the identity of this protein as a
virulence associated Staphylococcal secretory antigen (SsaA2).
To validate the MS result, we recombinantly expressed SsaA2
and subsequently confirmed its labelling by the corresponding
probes (Fig. 4B). SsaA2 is an uncharacterized protein that has
been previously reported to be involved in Staphylococcus
epidermidis sepsis and infective endocarditis.20 The protein
contains a cysteine protease sub-domain that is supposed to
process the protein into its mature form. Most likely SsaA2 is
labelled by the attachment of the active site cysteine residue
onto the CA tripeptide probe. To support this notion, we
pre-incubated the proteomic mixture with 5 mM N-ethyl-
maleimide (NEM) to alkylate all free cysteine residues.
Subsequent labelling with probe 10 revealed no residual
labelling, indicating that a reactive cysteine was blocked and
was no longer susceptible to CA probe alkylation (Fig. 4B). In
addition, we identified the reactive cysteine by an active site
and SFB 749, Romer-Stiftung, Fonds der chem. Industrie and
¨
CiPSM. We thank K. Kurz for excellent assistance.
Notes and references
1 G. Taubes, Science, 2008, 321, 356.
2 I. Staub and S. A. Sieber, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 13400.
3 T. Bottcher and S. A. Sieber, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
¨
14400.
4 T. Bottcher and S. A. Sieber, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47,
4600.
¨
5 M. J. Evans and B. F. Cravatt, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 3279.
6 M. Fonovic and M. Bogyo, Expert Rev. Proteomics, 2008, 5, 721.
7 C. M. Cabello, W. B. Bair, 3rd, S. D. Lamore, S. Ley, A. S. Bause,
S. Azimian and G. T. Wondrak, Free Radical Biol. Med., 2009, 46,
220.
8 E. Weerapana, G. M. Simon and B. F. Cravatt, Nat. Chem. Biol.,
2008, 4, 405.
9 S. Liu, B. Zhou, H. Yang, Y. He, Z. X. Jiang, S. Kumar, L. Wu
and Z. Y. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 8251.
10 H. Fu, J. Park and D. Pei, Biochemistry, 2002, 41, 10700.
11 J. Park, H. Fu and D. Pei, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2004, 14,
685.
12 R. DeVinney, O. Steele-Mortimer and B. B. Finlay, Trends
Microbiol., 2000, 8, 29.
13 A. E. Speers, G. C. Adam and B. F. Cravatt, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2003, 125, 4686.
14 L. Bialy and H. Waldmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44,
3814.
15 E. J. Moran, S. Sarshar, J. F. Cargill, M. M. Shahbaz, A. Lio, A.
M. M. Mjalli and R. W. Armstrong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117,
10787.
16 S. Zhang and Z. Y. Zhang, Drug Discovery Today, 2007, 12, 373.
17 M. H. Bender and J. Yother, J. Biol. Chem., 2001, 276, 47966.
18 O. Ilan, Y. Bloch, G. Frankel, H. Ullrich, K. Geider and
I. Rosenshine, EMBO J., 1999, 18, 3241.
19 Z. Y. Zhang and J. E. Dixon, Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol.
Biol., 1994, 68, 1.
Fig. 4 Labelling of the MRSA proteome. (A) Labelling of the MRSA
membrane proteome with a selection of CA and CAC probes (50 mM).
SsaA2 = Staphylococcal secretory antigen. (B) Labelling of recombi-
nant SsaA2 (À before induction, + after induction, DT heat control).
Blocking of free cysteine residues in native SsaA2 with NEM.
(C) SsaA2 active site cysteine mutation (À before induction, + after
induction). (D) Concentration dependence of SsaA2 labelling.
20 S. Lang, M. A. Livesley, P. A. Lambert, W. A. Littler and
T. S. Elliott, FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol., 2000, 29, 213.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Chem. Commun., 2009, 3741–3743 | 3743