of intramolecular Schmidt reactions involves formation of
chairlike azidohydrins followed by the selective migration
of the C-C bond antiperiplanar to the leaving diazonium
group.9b In this scenario, a bridged lactam can be obtained
only when the azide-containing chain occupies a pseudoaxial
orientation (see Supporting Information for details of this
published argument). Accordingly, we hypothesize that
lactam 2a is formed from the azidohydrin 4a (Scheme 1,
box) in which a stabilizing electrostatic 1,3-diaxial interaction
between the cation and thiomethyl groups becomes possible.
Figure 1. (a) Regiochemical options for the intramolecular Schmidt
Table 1. Synthesis of Bridged and Fused Lactams
reaction of R-substituted ketones. (b) Formation of bridged amides
and proposed intermediate leading to the major isomer.5
cation-π interaction8 into the key azidohydrin intermediate
(Figure 1b).
Herein, we report that the presence of an R-heteroatomic
group can also direct the regiochemistry of the intramolecular
Schmidt reaction toward path b (Figure 1). This stabilization
obviates the necessity for the locked conformation of the
reactive azidohydrin intermediate, significantly expanding the
utility of Schmidt reaction in the synthesis of one-carbon
bridged lactams. In addition, we provide explicit experimen-
tal confirmation that the regiochemistry of these reactions
depends on whether the azide-containing tether occupies an
axial or equatorial position.
entry azide
R1
R2 2:3 ratioa yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
SMe
H
80:20
86:14
>5:95
>5:95
>5:95
87:13
80
74
75
85
96
75
SMe, trans
SMe, cis
Hc
t-Bu
t-Bu
H
Phd
H
4-(MeO)C6H4, transd t-Bu
a
Determined by H NMR of the crude reaction mixture. b Combined
1
yield, see Supporting Information for full experimantal details. c Ref 9, TFA
instead of TfOH. d Ref 5, MeAlCl2 instead of TfOH.
Control experiments demonstrated that the axial orientation
of the azide-containing side-chain is required for the forma-
tion of bridged lactams (Table 1, entries 2 and 3) and that
the use of thiomethyl is crucial to the outcome of the reaction
(entries 1, 4, and 5). The selectivity observed with the
conformationally locked azide 1b equals the highest selectiv-
ity for a bridged isomer obtained in the previous study (cf.
entries 2 and 6). Thus, it appears that the R-thiomethyl effect
is comparable to those arising from cation-π interactions
as previously reported.5 However, a significant remarkable
advantage is that the thiomethyl-containing substrate does
not require an additional conformational constraint (entries
1 and 6), allowing for the synthesis of otherwise unsubstituted
bridged lactams.
Scheme 1
The first example of an intramolecular Schmidt reaction
to afford a bridged bicyclic lactam without relying on the
locked conformation of cyclohexanone was encountered
when a thiomethyl was placed in the R position to the ketone
(Scheme 1).4d We orginally proposed that the mechanism
The proposed reactive intermediates are shown in Scheme
2. The fact that the trans isomer 1b leads primarily to the
bridged product while the cis isomer 1c affords only fused
product provides the first experimental support for the
original hypothesis of the intramolecular Schmidt reaction
requiring the azidoalkyl chain in the axial orientation to give
(7) For selected examples from the recent literature, see: (a) Frankowski,
K. J.; Golden, J. E.; Zeng, Y. B.; Lei, Y.; Aube´, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 6018. (b) Iyengar, R.; Schildknegt, K.; Morton, M.; Aube´, J. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10645. (c) Wrobleski, A.; Sahasrabudhe, K.; Aube´,
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5475. (d) Lertpibulpanyaa, D.; Marsden,
S. P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 3498. (e) Zhao, Y. M.; Gu, P.; Zhang,
H. J.; Zhang, Q. W.; Fan, C. A.; Tu, Y. Q.; Zhang, F. M. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 3211.
(8) For reviews, see: (a) Dougherty, D. A. Science 1996, 271, 163. (b)
Ma, J. C.; Dougherty, D. A. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1303. (c) Yamada, S.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 2903. For selected examples, see: (d) Katz,
C. E.; Aube´, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13948. (e) Katz, C. E.; Ribelin,
T.; Withrow, D.; Basseri, Y.; Manukyan, A. K.; Bermudez, A.; Nuera, C. G.;
Day, V. W.; Powell, D. R.; Poutsma, J. L.; Aube´, J. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
73, 3318. (f) Monje, P.; Paleo, M. R.; Garcia-Rio, L.; Sardina, F. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 7394. (g) Ishihara, K.; Fushimi, N.; Akakura, M. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 1049.
(9) (a) Aube´, J.; Milligan, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8965.
(b) Milligan, G. L.; Mossman, C. J.; Aube´, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 10449. (c) Pearson, W. H.; Walavalkar, R.; Schkeryantz, J. M.; Fang,
W. K.; Blickensdorf, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10183. (d) Smith,
B. T.; Gracias, V.; Aube´, J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3771. For examples
of Schmidt reaction involving 4-C tether, see: (e) Gracias, V.; Zeng, Y.;
Desai, P.; Aube´, J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4999. (f) Smith, B. T.; Wendt, J. A.;
Aube´, J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2577. (g) Ref 7c. For examples of Schmidt
reaction involving 8- and larger rings, see: ref 9b.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 19, 2009
4387