Organic Letters
Letter
smoothly to afford the desired biaryl products in good to
excellent yields (46−90%), whereas the substrates bearing
electron-donating groups (3s and 3t) gave inferior yields (68
and 50%, respectively). The cross-coupling reaction proceeded
smoothly with substrates bearing a range of heterocyclic
motifs, such as pyrrole (3u, 60%), carbazole (3v, 73%),
pyrimidine (3w, 39%), and pyrazole (3x, 55%). Vinyl iodides
(3w and 3x) were also able to couple to 2-PySO2CF2H.
However, substrates with an acidic proton (such as free alcohol
and acid) were not viable in the current nickel-catalyzed
reductive 2-pyridination (3ya, 3yb, and 3yc).
methyl 2-pyridyl sulfone (2d, 2-PySO2CH3) provided only a
trace amount of 3d under the standard reaction conditions.
To gain mechanistic insights into this nickel-catalyzed
reductive cross-coupling reaction with zinc, we conducted
several preliminary mechanistic experiments (Scheme 5). First,
Scheme 5. Mechanistic Investigation
In addition to 2-PySO2CF2H, 2-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine
(2-PySO2CH3) and its derivatives were also employed to
examine their reactivity in nickel-catalyzed reductive cross-
coupling with aryl iodides. As shown in Scheme 3, these
a b
,
Scheme 3. Substrate Scope of 2-PySO2CH3 Derivatives
we performed nickel-catalyzed cross-coupling of 2-Py-
SO2CF2H with preformed phenylzinc iodide, which gave the
product 3c in 70% yield, suggesting that an arylzinc reagent
might be engaged in this nickel-catalyzed cross-electrophile
coupling process. Furthermore, difluoromethanesulfinate salt
was observed as a byproduct via 19F NMR in 82% yield under
the standard reaction conditions, which suggests that the
generation of a difluoromethyl radical from 2-PySO2CF2H (as
a major pathway) is unlikely during the reaction. Furthermore,
the detection of 1,1′-biphenyl in this reaction (via GC-MS)
also supports the involvement of arylzinc. Although the exact
mechanism remains unclear, on the basis of these experiments
and the previous investigation, we propose a plausible
mechanism for the present nickel-catalyzed cross-electrophile
coupling reaction (Scheme 6). The catalytic cycle may be
a
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.8 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 2 (1.2 mmol, 1.5
equiv), NiCl2 (10 mol %), dppp (10 mol %), Zn (1.6 mmol, 2.0
equiv), DMF (5.0 mL), 80 °C, 16 h. Isolated yield.
b
electron-withdrawing group-substituted methyl sulfones under-
went reductive cross-coupling reactions, giving the correspond-
ing products 3aa−ae in moderate yields. Moreover, we also
found that electron-deficient aryl iodides showed better
reactivity in this reaction. Finally, we investigated the reactivity
of different fluoroalkylated 2-pyridyl sulfones under the
standard reaction conditions (Scheme 4) and found that the
Scheme 6. Proposed Mechanism
Scheme 4. Cross-Coupling with Different Fluoroalkyl 2-
a b
,
Pyridyl Sulfones
initiated by the reduction of NiCl2(dppp)n to Ni(0) species A
by Zn(0). The oxidative addition of 2-PySO2CF2H to Ni(0)
species A affords an arylnickel(II) species B.11 The subsequent
transmetalation of the arylnickel(II) species B with the arylzinc
reagent, which is in situ generated from aryl iodides and
Zn(0),12 furnishes Ni(II) species C. Finally, the reductive
elimination from C delivers the desired product D and
regenerates the catalytically active Ni(0) species A.13
a
Reaction conditions: 4-iodobiphenyl (0.8 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 2 (1.2
mmol, 1.5 equiv), NiCl2 (10 mol %), dppp (10 mol %), Zn (1.6
mmol, 2.0 equiv), DMF (5.0 mL), 80 °C, 16 h. Isolated yield.
b
In summary, we have developed a novel nickel-catalyzed
reductive cross-coupling reaction of 2-PySO2CF2H with aryl
iodides to forge C(sp2)−C(sp2) bonds via selective C(sp2)−S
bond cleavage. This synthetic protocol employs readily
available starting materials and reagents, proceeds under mild
conditions, and tolerates a range of functional groups and
reductive cross-coupling of 2-PySO2CF2H (2a) and fluoro-
methyl 2-pyridyl sulfone (2b, 2-PySO2CFH2) with 4-
iodobiphenyl proceeded smoothly to deliver the desired biaryl
3d in 83 and 62% yield, respectively. However, the reactions
with trifluoromethyl 2-pyridyl sulfone (2c, 2-PySO2CF3) and
713
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 711−715