A (1) and B (2), were identified from the metabolites in a
nutrient-limited medium containing 10% NaCl. To the best
of our knowledge, this is the first example of cyclopeptides
containing both anthranilic acid and dehydroamino acid
residues in natural products, and the microbial secondary
metabolites under high salt culture conditions were rarely
reported.
due to the deshielding effect of the 27-carbonyl,8,9 while 2
was E-configuration. The absolute configurations of 1 and 2
were determined by amino acids analyses of acidic hydroly-
sates through a chiral Crownpak CR(+) HPLC column.9,10
Mix HPLC analyses of the hydrolysates with authentic
samples (co-injection) confirmed that the amino acids both
in 1 and 2 were L-Thr, L-Ala, D-Phe, and D-Ser.
A. sclerotiorum PT06-1 was grown under static conditions
at 28 °C for 30 days and then was harvested by extraction
with EtOAc. The EtOAc extract was concentrated under
reduced pressure to give a dark brown gum (8.0 g). The crude
residue was separated into five fractions on a silica gel
vacuum liquid chromatograph using a step gradient elution
with MeOH-CHCl3 (0-100%). Fraction 3 (1.2 g) from the
20:1 of CHCl3/MeOH eluents was subjected to silica gel
column chromatography using a step gradient elution of
acetone/petroleum ether (40-100%) to afford three subfrac-
tions (Fr.3-1∼3-3). Fr.3-3 (73 mg) was combined with
fraction 4 (0.8 g) from the 10:1 of CHCl3/MeOH eluents,
and the mixture was further separated into four subfractions
(Fr.4-1∼4-4) by Sephadex LH-20, eluting with MeOH.
Fr.4-1 (240 mg) was then purified by semipreparative HPLC
(57% MeOH/H2O, 4.0 mL/min) to yield compounds 2 (14
mg, tR ) 13 min) and 1 (90 mg, tR ) 15 min). Both compounds
1 and 2 were kept away from radiation by silver paper.
Figure 1.
Key 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations of 1 and 2.
To further confirm the geometry of the double bond,
conformational searches were performed by the HyperChem
package using an Amber force field. The conformations with
low energy from 0 to 3 kcal/mol were optimized again at
the B3LYP/3-21G* level.11 The B3LYP/3-21G*-optimized
geometries with energy from 0 to 1.5 kcal/mol were
optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level to look for the most
stable geometries.12 Both structures were found that have
1.0 kcal/mol energy lower than the second stable conforma-
tion. Thus, only two conformations were used in 13C NMR
computations at the B3LYP/6-311+G(2d,p) level for 1 and
2. The magnetic shielding values were converted into
chemical shifts after the corrections using slope and intercept
of the linear-square functions.13 The relative errors of
chemical shifts were computed by subtracting the calculated
13C NMR from the experimental shifts. Two cases should
be considered in the data treatments. The first case is that
Compound 1, [R]25 -73 (c 0.3, MeOH), UV (MeOH)
D
λmax (log ε) 203 (3.9), 222 (3.8), 268 (3.3), 350 (3.6) nm,
was obtained as a yellow amorphous powder. Its molecular
formula was determined as C37H39N7O8 according to the
HRESIMS at m/z 710.2962 [M + H]+, requiring 22 degrees
1
of unsaturation. Analysis of H and 13C NMR data (Table
1) revealed the presence of six carbonyl signals (δC 172.6,
171.7, 170.4, 170.3, 169.0, and 163.6) and six amide protons
(δH 7.37, 8.37, 8.62, 8.76, 8.77, and 10.92) coupling with
signals between 3.6 and 4.6 ppm, indicating the hexapeptide
nature of 1. 1H-1H COSY experiment (Figure 1) constructed
the six amino acid residues as threonine, alanine, phenyla-
lanine, serine, anthranilic acid (AA), and dehydrotryptophan
(∆-Trp). These residues accounted for 21 of the 22 degrees
of unsaturation, indicating that 1 is a cyclopeptide. The amino
acid sequence was determined mainly by HMBC correlations
of the carbonyl carbon of one amino acid residue with the
amide protons of the neighboring residue, and the carbonyl
carbon signals in each amino acid unit were deduced by their
HMBC correlations with the ꢀ-proton of respective amino
acids (Figure 1). Thus, the constitution of 1 was assigned as
(8) Marchelli, R.; Dossena, A.; Pochini, A.; Dradi, E. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1977, 713–717
(9) Wang, W. L.; Lu, Z. Y.; Tao, H. W.; Zhu, T. J.; Fang, Y. C.; Gu,
Q. Q.; Zhu, W. M. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1558–1564
(10) Gunasekera, S. P.; Ross, C.; Paul, V. J.; Matthew, S.; Luesch, H.
J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 887–890
.
.
.
(11) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.;
Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.;
Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.;
Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.;
Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li,
X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.;
Gomperts, R.; Stratemann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.;
Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.;
Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels,
A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuk, A. D.; Raghavachari,
K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.;
Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.;
Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng,
C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.;
Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03 User’s
Reference; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2003.
cyclo (Thr-Ala-Phe-Ser-AA-∆-Trp). Compound 2, [R]25
D
-111 (c 0.3, MeOH), UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (3.9),
222 (3.8), 274 (3.3), 352 (3.5) nm, showed a pseudomo-
lecular ion peak at m/z 710.2929 [M + H]+, indicating that
2 was an isomer of 1. As expected, UV absorption and 1D
NMR data (Table 1) of 2 were very similar to those of 1.
Further analysis of 2D NMR data of 2 (Figure 1) revealed
that 2 shared the same constitution as 1. The obvious
differences between H-29, H-38, and NH in dehydrotryp-
tophan residue revealed that 1 and 2 are a pair of geometric
isomers of C28dC29. The downfield chemical shift of H-28
(δH 7.96 vs 7.03) implied Z-configuration of C28dC29 in 1
(12) (a) Timmons, C.; Wipf, P. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 9168–9170.
(b) Nielsen, D. K.; Nielsen, L. L.; Jones, S. B.; Toll, L.; Asplund, M. C.;
Castle, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1187–1199.
(13) Liu, D. Z.; Wang, F.; Liao, T. G.; Tang, J. G.; Steglich, W.; Zhu,
H. J.; Liu, J. K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5749–5752.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 22, 2009
5263