R. Arban et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 5044–5049
5049
of molecules, a pharmacophoric model16 was built using molecules
Supplementary data
15, 29, 37, 43, and 44 (Fig. 8). In fact, it was quite evident that the
position of the terminal nitrogen on the RHS in compounds 43 and
37, was superimposable with the position of the terminal nitrogen
in the linear chain of compound 15.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
The in vitro pharmacology profile of many exemplars of both ser-
ies proved to be very attractive. In addition, the developability pro-
file of both series was encouraging; both metabolic stability
(Intrinsic Clearance, Cli) and CyP450 inhibition profiles for many
compounds appeared promising. Based on the in vitro pharmacol-
ogy of the different compounds, compound 11 was selected for
in vivo pharmacokinetic studies in the rat.17 Compound 11 as lead
exemplar of the pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrazine series proved to be selec-
tive towards V1a, V2, and OT receptor subtypes (pIC50 V1a < 4.3,
pIC50 V2 < 4.5, andpIC50 OT < 4.7). Inadditioncompound11wassub-
mitted to the Cerep ‘Comprehensive Pharmacological Profile’ panel,
including 154 biological targets (GPCRs, ion channels, transporters
and enzymes), where it produced less than 50% displacement of
References and notes
1. Jard, S.; Barberis, C.; Audigier, S.; Tribollet, E. Prog. Brain Res. 1987, 72, 173.
2. Lee, B.; Yang, C.; Chen, T. H.; Al-Azawi, N.; Hsu, W. H. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol.
Metab. 1995, 269, 32.
3. Scott, L. V.; Dinan, T. G. Life Sci. 1998, 62, 1985.
4. Aguilera, G.; Rabadan-Diehl, C. Regul. Pept. 2000, 96, 23.
5. Serradeil-Le Gal, C.; Wagnon, J.; Simiand, J.; Griebel, G.; Lacour, C.; Guillon, G.;
Barberis, C.; Brossard, G.; Soubrie, P.; Nisato, D.; Pascal, M.; Pruss, R.; Scatton,
B.; Maffrand, J. P.; Le Fur, G. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 300, 1122.
6. Griebel, G.; Stemmelin, J.; Gal, C. S.; Soubrie, P. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 1549.
7. Griffante, C.; Green, A.; Curcuruto, O.; Haslam, C. P.; Dickinson, B. A.; Arban, R.
Br. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 146, 744.
8. Craighead, M.; Milne, R.; Campbell-Wan, L.; Watson, L.; Presland, J.; Thomson,
F. J.; Marston, H. M.; MacSweeney, C. P. Prog. Brain Res. 2008, 170, 527.
9. Shimazaki, T.; Iijima, M.; Chaki, S. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 543, 63.
10. Stemmelin, J.; Lukovic, L.; Salome, N.; Griebel, G. Neuropsychopharmacology
2005, 30, 35.
binding or inhibition at 1 lM in the full panel.
Furthermore, the PK profile of compound 11 proved to be accept-
able with moderate blood clearance and high volume of distribution,
high oral bioavailability and good brain penetration (Table 8).
In summary, we identified a novel series of potent vasopressin
11. Salome, N.; Stemmelin, J.; Cohen, C.; Griebel, G. Psychopharmacology (Berl)
2006, 187, 237.
12. Hickman, Z. L.; Sturino, C. F.; Lanchance, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8217.
13. Di Fabio, R.; Gentile, G.; Micheli, F.; Pasquarello, A.; Pozzan, A.; Tarsi, L.; Terreni,
S.; Tonelli, F. WO2009/130231.
14. Martins, M. A. P.; Pereira, C. M. P.; Zimmermann, N. E. K.; Moura, S.; Sinhorin, A.
P.; Cunico, W.; Zanatta, N.; Bonacorso, H. G.; Flores, A. C. F. Synthesis 2003, 15,
2353.
15. Di Fabio, R.; Gentile, G.; Pozzan, A.; Tarsi, L.; Terreni, S.; Tonelli, F. WO2009/
130232 .
16. The common feature pharmacophore was built using Catalyst (2009) as
implemented into the Discovery Studio platform. Conformers were generated
using the FAST algorithm and defaults settings. The best hypothesis is the one
depicted in the paper.
17. All the works involving animals were carried out in accordance with European
directive 86/609/EEC governing animal welfare and protection, which is
acknowledged by Italian Legislative Decree No. 116, 27 January 1992, and
according to internal review performed by the GlaxoSmithKline Committee on
Animal Research & Ethics (CARE) and to the company Policy on the Care and
Use of Laboratory Animals.
V1b receptor antagonists within which key exemplars showed high
selectivity with respect to V1a, V2, and OT receptor subtypes. The
best example selected from the series herein described, showed
high selectivity over an extensive range of GPCRs, ion channels,
transporters and enzymes. Moreover, this selected compound
exhibited a promising pharmacokinetic profile, including good
CNS penetration. Compounds from these series therefore deserve
to be further explored in vivo to exploit the therapeutic potential
of selective V1b receptor antagonists for human diseases.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Mauro Pavan and Dr. Ornella Perini from
analytical group in Verona and Dr. Dino Montanari and his DMPK
group for the support received.