M. M. M. Santos et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 193–195
195
4. Alguacil, R.; Fariña, F.; Martín, M. V.; Paredes, M. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
6773.
5. Stevens, J.; Welton, T.; Deville, J.; Behar, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 8901.
6. Matsuura, T.; Bode, J. W.; Hachisu, Y.; Suzuki, K. Synlett 2003, 1746.
7. Chuang, C.; Wu, Y.; Jiang, M. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 11229.
8. Snider, B. B.; Che, Q. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7821.
9. Santos, D.; Santos, M. M. M.; Viana, R. J. S.; Castro, R. E.; Moreira, R.; Rodrigues,
C. M. P. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2009, 180, 175.
(1) There was marked variability among the strains with regard
to their susceptibilities to the various test compounds. This
is particularly evident for the C. albicans ATCC 90028 and
PYCC 3436T strains (e.g., compounds 1c, 1d and 4a). Such
variability suggests there are biological factor(s) affecting
strain/species and test compound bioactivity.
10. (a) Nitromethyl derivative (2.2 mmol) and DIEA (4.4 mmol) were added to a
solution of 2,3-dichloro-1,4-naphthoquinone (2.2 mmol) in EtOH (50 mL) with
molecular sieves. After reflux, under argon atmosphere, the solution was
filtered and evaporated to dryness. The residue was submitted to flash
chromatography (n-hexane/ethyl acetate 8:2).; (b) Nitromethyl derivative
(2.2 mmol) and base (4.4 mmol) were added to a solution of 2,3-dichloro-1,4-
naphthoquinone (2.2 mmol) in CH3CN (50 mL). After reflux, under argon
atmosphere, the mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and washed with H2O
(3Â). The organic extract was dried and concentrated. The residue was
submitted to flash chromatography (n-hexane/ethyl acetate 8:2).
11. Fieser, L. F.; Brown, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 3609.
12. Compound 6: mp 122–124 °C; IR (NaCl) 1721, 1674; dH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 1.26
(3H, t, J = 8.0 Hz, CH3), 3.92 (2H, s, CH2), 4.18 (2H, q, J = 8.0 Hz, OCH2), 7.76 (2H,
t, J = 4.0 Hz, ArH), 8.10–8.13 (1H, m, ArH), 8.15–8.18 (1H, m, ArH); dC (100 MHz,
CDCl3) 14.1 (CH3), 37.1 (CH2), 61.6 (OCH2), 127.3 (CHAr), 127.7 (CHAr), 131.1
(CAr), 131.2 (CAr), 134.2 (CHAr), 134.4 (CHAr), 141.2 (CAr), 144.7 (CAr), 168.1
(CO), 177.4 (CO), 181.1 (CO).
(2) Strain ATCC 90028 appeared to be the least sensitive, to
almost all the compounds. Only compound 6, with an
MIC50 of 1.5 lg/mL demonstrated antifungal activity equiva-
lent to that of AmpB (Amphotericin B) for this strain. In addi-
tion, this compound also had notable activity against PYCC
strains 2545 and 3436T.
(3) Only compounds 1a and 1b showed a level of activity equiv-
alent to that of AmpB against strain ATCC 22019. Compound
1a appeared to have the broadest antifungal activity, show-
ing MIC50 values at or below that of AmpB for all strains,
except ATCC 90028. Compound 1b was next in breadth of
activity, with MIC50 values at or below those of AmpB for
four of the six strains. Compound 1c demonstrated reason-
13. McElvain, S. M.; Engelhardt, E. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944, 66, 1077.
14. Compound 8: mp 134–135 °C; IR (NaCl) 1723, 1661; dH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 1.25
(3H, t, J = 8.0 Hz, CH3), 3.65 (2H, s, CH2), 3.93 (3H, s, OMe), 4.15 (2H, q,
J = 8.0 Hz, OCH2); dC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 14.1 (CH3), 32.9 (CH2), 61.6 (OCH2), 62.0
(OCH3), 124.4 (CAr), 136.7 (CAr), 141.6 (CAr), 153.2 (CAr), 169.0 (CO), 182.1
(CO).
able antifungal activity, with MIC50 levels <1.0
lg/mL
against PYCC strains, 2545, 3436T and 2418T.
(4) The order of the antifungal activity in compounds 1 seems to
depend on the nature of the EWG in position 3 and varies in
the order ester > sulfone > ketone.
15. Compound 1c: mp 190–191 °C; IR (NaCl) 1716, 1675; dH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 7.67
(2H, t, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.78 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.83–7.92 (2H, m, ArH),
8.24–8.30 (4H, m, ArH); dC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 118.9 (CAr), 127.7 (CHAr), 128.1
(CHAr), 129.5 (2 CHAr), 129.9 (2 CHAr), 131.5 (CAr), 133.0 (CAr), 134.3 (CHAr),
135.5 (CHAr), 135.8 (CHAr), 137.3 (CAr), 162.5 (CAr), 166.6 (CN), 172.3 (CO),
175.7 (CO). HMRS C17H10NO5S (M+1) 340.02797, found 340.02847.
16. Compound 1d: mp 124–125 °C; IR (NaCl) 1689, 1589; dH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 7.56
(2H, t, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.69–7.73 (1H, m, ArH), 7.84–7.89 (2H, m, ArH), 8.08
(2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.21–8.23 (1H, m, ArH), 8.30–8.32 (1H, m, ArH); dC
(100 MHz, CDCl3) 121.2 (CAr), 127.7 (CHAr), 127.8 (CHAr), 129.0 (2 CHAr),
130.5 (2 CHAr), 132.0 (CAr), 133.3 (CAr), 134.7 (CHAr), 134.9 (CAr), 135.3
(CHAr), 135.5 (CHAr), 157.8 (CAr), 165.3 (CN), 177.0 (CO), 177.1 (CO), 188.9
(CO). HMRS C18H10NO4 (M+1) 304.06098, found 304.06211.
(5) Compounds 1d, 4a and 4b, also showed reasonable antifungal
activities equivalent to that of AmpB against one strain, each.
Compound 8, although exhibiting fair antifungal activity at
the lg/mL level against all strains, did not present any MIC50
values at or below that of AmpB against any of the strains.
In summary, we describe a new methodology for the synthesis of
isoxazoles 1 containing an EWG in position 3. Although the yields
are lower than those described for the synthesis of isoxazole 1a
(lit. 55% yield),7 our procedure uses cleaner chemistry and only
1 equiv of both commercial starting materials. Also, our method is
not restricted to the use of ethyl nitroacetate, but seems to be gen-
eral for other nitromethyl derivatives. In addition, all the test com-
ꢀ
17. Crystal data for C14H9NO5, Mr = 271.22, triclinic space group P1, a = 7.1485(3),
b = 8.5516(2), c = 10.1860(5) Å,
U = 594.50(4) Å3, Z = 2, Dcalcd = 1.515 g cmÀ3
pale yellow crystal 0.6 Â 0.4 Â 0.05 mm, hmax = 27.49°, 2704 unique data,
10685 measured (Rint = 0.0272), R1 = 0.0363 and wR2 = 0.0988 [I > 2 (I)].
a
= 79.315(2), b = 88.841(2),
c
= 76.382(2)°,
,
l
= 0.117 mmÀ1
, F(0 0 0) = 280,
r
pounds showed effective levels of antifungal activity at the lg/mL
Supplementary data have been deposited with the CCDC deposition number
CCDC 674974.
level. Importantly, 1a and 1b showed the broadest activity and were
equivalent to or better than the standard antifungal drug Amphoter-
icin B against five of the six strains examined. The observation that
naphtho[2,3-d]isoxazole-4,9-dione-3-carboxylates 1a–b are non-
cytotoxic in human cellular lines9 strongly suggests that the naph-
tho[2,3-d]isoxazole-4,9-dione scaffold has the potential to be devel-
oped into novel and safe therapeutic antifungal agents. The
mechanism for the formation of isoxazoles 1a–d is understudy.
18. Determination of MIC Levels: Antifungal activities of 1a–d, 4a–b, 6 and 8 and
amphotericin B (AmpB; Sigma–Aldrich, Sigma A2411), were based on Minimal
Inhibitory concentrations for 50% cell death (MIC50). Microtitre plate bioassays
for determining the MIC50 values were based on modified protocols outlined in
the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), old National Committee
for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), document M27-A, National
Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards., Wayne, PA, USA. The
compounds were first dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (1 mg/mL)
then further diluted 10-fold in SG (100 lg/mL, stock solution) (SG minimal
medium: 6.7 mg/mL yeast nitrogen base w/o amino acids, 2% glucose). Next, 30
separate dilutions were made of each compound so that the microtitre plate
wells had final concentrations of 97.5, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 15, 10, 7.5,
5.0, 3.75, 2.5, 1.25, 1.0, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.1, 0.075, 0.05, 0.0250, 0.0150,
Acknowledgments
0.0125, 0.01, 0.005 and 0.0025 lg/mL of each test compound or AmpB. The
This project was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecn-
ologia (Portugal). The authors would also like to thank EPSRC for
funding the National Crystallography Service.
dilutions included respective volumes of stock solution and medium, plus
10
200
l
l
L (approx. 5 Â 103 cells) of stock yeast culture to bring the final volume to
L/ well. Control wells included 20 lL DMSO up to 200 lL SG. All bioassay
dilutions were done in triplicate. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 48 h.
Level of yeast cell reproduction for each concentration of the test compounds
and AmpB was determined by optical density (OD) using a microtitre plate
reader (Microplate Reader Model 680, Biorad) at 655 nm. OD readings were
converted to% cell reproduction (OD concentration/OD control). The mean of
the triplicate readings was then determined. MIC50 values were determined by
probit analysis of % cell reproduction versus concentration of test compounds
or ampB using the statistical analysis program provided by SPSS (Chicago, IL,
USA).
References and notes
1. Dewick, P. M., In Medicinal Natural Products, 2nd ed., Wiley, Chichester, UK,
2002
2. Pinho e Melo, T. M. V. D. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 9, 925.
3. (a) Kano, H.; Ogata, M.; Yukinaga, H. U.S. Patent 3,835,168, 1974.; (b) Kano, H.;
Ogata, M.; Yukinaga, H. U.S. Patent 3,933,828, 1976.