extended acyclic side chain compared to salacinol 1. We
report here the syntheses of the nitrogen 8 and 9 and selenium
10 and 11 congeners of kotalanol and de-O-sulfonated
kotalanol (Figure 2) and their evaluation as glucosidase
Figure 1. Sulfonium-ion glucosidase inhibitors isolated from
Salacia species and related analogues.
We have synthesized several analogues of salacinol and
studied their structure activity relationship (SAR) with human
intestinal maltase glucoamylase (MGA).8 Some of the
modifications included: replacement of the ring-sulfur het-
eroatom by the cognate atoms nitrogen9,10 and selenium;11
change of the configurations of the stereogenic centers; and
extension of the acyclic side chain.12 Some of these
compounds have shown higher or comparable inhibitory
activities against MGA in Vitro compared to acarbose and
miglitol, two antidiabetic drugs that are currently in use for
the treatment of type-2 diabetes.13,14
The acyclic side chain-extension studies of salacinol led
us to predict the possible stereochemical pattern of the acyclic
side chain in kotalanol 2, for which the absolute stereostruc-
ture was not determined at the time of its isolation. Recently,
we have proved the absolute stereostructure of kotalanol 2
and de-O-sulfonated kotalanol 3 by total syntheses.15 In the
case of salacinol, the substitution of the ring sulfur atom by
nitrogen (ghavamiol, 6,9 IC50 ) high mM range,16 Figure
1) resulted in a dramatic decrease in inhibitory activity
against MGA (compare the Ki value of salacinol, 0.19 µM13),
whereas substitution by selenium (blintol, 7, Ki ) 0.49 µM,13
Figure 1) did not affect its inhibitory activity appreciably.
Figure 2. Heteroanalogues and stereoisomers of kotalanol and de-
O-sulfonated kotalanol.
inhibitors against the amino terminal catalytic domain of
human MGA (ntMGAM).13 Since de-O-sulfonated kotalanol
3 was found to be more active than kotalanol 2 itself,6 we
have also converted two biologically active diastereomers
12 and 13 of kotalanol17 into their corresponding de-O-
sulfonated analogues 14 and 15, respectively (Figure 2), and
studied their inhibitory properties against ntMGAM.
The required para-methoxybenzyl (PMB)-protected D-
iminoarabinitol 1618 and D-selenoarabinitol 1719 were pre-
pared by methods described in our earlier work. The required
cyclic sulfate 18 was obtained from D-perseitol, as reported
earlier.15 The synthesis of the nitrogen analogue 8 of
kotalanol was examined first. The coupling reaction of the
iminoarabinitol 16 with the cyclic sulfate 18 proceeded
smoothly under our optimized reaction conditions (sealed
tube, acetone, K2CO3, 60 °C) as shown in Scheme 1.18 The
coupled product 19 was purified by short column chroma-
tography but was deemed to be unstable, probably due to
the partial removal of PMB protecting groups, as confirmed
by the formation of a more polar spot on TLC. Hence,
without any further characterization, the coupled product 19
was taken on to the next step, namely removal of the PMB
and benzylidene protecting groups using TFA/CH2Cl2, as
shown in Scheme 1.
It is of interest, therefore, to study the effect of heteroatom
substitution on the inhibitory activities of kotalanol 2 and
de-O-sulfonated kotalanol 3, both having a 3-carbon-
(8) For recent reviews, see: (a) Mohan, S.; Pinto, B. M. Carbohydr.
Res. 2007, 342, 1551–1580. (b) Mohan, S.; Pinto, B. M. Collect. Czech.
Chem. Commun. 2009, 74, 1117–1136. (c) Mohan, S.; Pinto, B. M. Nat.
Prod. Rep. 2010, in press.
(9) Ghavami, A.; Johnston, B. D.; Jensen, M. T.; Svensson, B.; Pinto,
Similarly, the selenium analogue 10 of kotalanol was
obtained from selenoarabinitol 17 and the cyclic sulfate 18
using our optimized reaction conditions (sealed tube, HFIP,
K2CO3, 70 °C).18 As observed in previous work from our
laboratory,11 during the coupling reaction of D-selenoara-
binitol 17 with the cyclic sulfate 18, along with the desired
coupled product 20 (40% yield), a considerable amount of
the undesired diastereomer 21 (26% yield), with respect to
the selenium center, was also formed (Scheme 1). The
B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6268–6271
.
(10) Muraoka, O.; Ying, S.; Yoshikai, K.; Matsuura, Y.; Yamada, E.;
Minematsu, T.; Tanabe, G.; Matsuda, H.; Yoshikawa, M. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 2001, 49, 1503–1505
.
(11) Johnston, B. D.; Ghavami, A.; Jensen, M. T.; Svensson, B.; Pinto,
B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8245–8250.
(12) (a) Johnston, B. D.; Jensen, H. H.; Pinto, B. M. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 1111–1118. (b) Nasi, R.; Sim, L.; Rose, D. R.; Pinto, B. M. J.
Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 180–186.
(13) Rossi, E. J.; Sim, L.; Kuntz, D. A.; Hahn, D.; Johnston, B. D.;
Ghavami, A.; Szczepina, M. G.; Kumar, N. S.; Sterchi, E. E.; Nichols, B. L.;
Pinto, B. M.; Rose, D. R. FEBS J. 2006, 273, 2673–2683
(14) Sim, L.; Jayakanthan, K.; Mohan, S.; Nasi, R.; Johnston, B. D.;
Pinto, B. M.; Rose, D. R. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 443–451
.
.
(17) Nasi, R.; Patrick, B. O.; Sim, L.; Rose, D. R.; Pinto, B. M. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 6172–6181.
(15) Jayakanthan, K.; Mohan, S.; Pinto, B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 5621–5626.
(18) Liu, H.; Sim, L.; Rose, D. R.; Pinto, B. M. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
71, 3007–3013.
(16) Pinto, B. M.; Johnston, B. D.; Ghavami, A.; Szczepina, M. G.;
Liu, H.; Sadalapure, K., US Patent, filed June 25, 2004.
(19) Liu, H.; Pinto, B. M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 753–755.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 5, 2010
1089