1200
J. Koivukorpi, E. Kolehmainen / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 1199–1201
Figure 1. SEM images of xerogels: (a and b) 6 in 1-heptanol; (c and d) 6 in 1-octanol; (e and f) 6 in 1-nonanol.
the solid material had dissolved (if soluble), and then cooled in an
ultrasonic bath. The gel formed immediately upon cooling or with-
in half an hour. If no flow was observed when the test-tube was
turned upside down, the contents were considered to be a gel.
The formation of gels is based on self-assembly of organic mol-
ecules driven by intermolecular interactions.12 In our compounds
the hydrogen bonds between the urea, amide, and hydroxy groups
for different applications such as drug delivery, stereospecific syn-
thesis, etc.15
In conclusion, we have designed and synthesized six deoxychol-
ic acid alkylamido-phenylurea derivatives. Two of these deriva-
tives showed gelation ability in organic solvents: monomeric
derivative 3 in chlorinated solvents, and dimeric derivative 6 in
THF and higher 1-alkanols containing 7–10 carbons. No signature
of macroscopic chirality of the gels was visible. It was also found
that the length of the alkyl chain between the amide and urea
groups affects the solubility of the derivative. Our plan is to extend
this research to other common bile acids and study whether some
drug molecules are incorporated in these gels for drug delivery and
other applications.
are the strongest driving forces in gel formation.13 Also, weaker
p–
p
interactions may have some influence.14 A monomeric deriva-
tive, 3 formed supramolecular gels in CHCl3 and chlorobenzene,
whereas dimeric derivative 6 formed a gel in THF and higher 1-alk-
anols containing 7–10 carbons (1-heptanol, 1-octanol, 1-nonanol,
and 1-decanol, respectively) (Table 1). According to these results,
it seems that the long aliphatic chain in alcohols also has an impor-
tant role in gel formation. The other derivatives did not form gels in
any of the 16 solvents studied. Their solubility in alcohols is prob-
ably too good for gel formation in the case of monomeric deriva-
tives 1 and 3, whereas 5, although more sparingly soluble, did
not form a gel regardless. We also expected that dimeric 2 and 4
would form gels in some alcohols as a result of their solubility,
but not even thickening of the solution was observed in the con-
centration range studied. The dimeric derivatives, as well as mono-
meric 5, were sparingly soluble in the other solvents, except
alcohols.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Spec. Lab. Tech. Reijo Kauppinen for his help
in running the NMR spectra, Spec. Lab. Tech. Mirja Lahtipera for
running ESI-TOF mass spectra, Lab. Tech. Elina Hautakangas for
elemental analysis, and Lab. Tech. Hannu Salo for SEM images.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
The alkyl spacer (varying from ethyl to butyl) between the
amide and urea groups in 1–6 affects their solubilities in the
solvents tested, and it seems to follow the order: propyl > ethyl >
butyl. It is also evident that monomeric derivatives have better sol-
ubility than their dimeric counterparts.
References
1. Enhsen, A.; Kramer, W.; Wess, G. Drug Discovery Today 1998, 3, 409.
2. (a) Hofmann, A. F. Ital. J. Gastroenterol. 1995, 27, 106; (b) Corpechot, C.; Carrat,
F.; Bonnand, A.-M.; Poupon, R. E.; Poupon, R. Hepatology 2000, 32, 1196.
3. (a) Terech, P.; Weiss, R. G. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 3133; (b) Banerjee, S.; Das, R. K.;
Maitra, U. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 6649.
4. (a) Maitra, U.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Sarkar, A.; Rao, P.; Indi, S. S. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed 2001, 40, 2281; (b) Mukhopadhyay, S.; Maitra, U.; Ira Krishnamoorthy, G.;
Schmidt, J.; Talmon, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15905; (c) Bhat, S.; Maitra, U.
Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7309; (d) Babu, P.; Sangeetha, N. M.; Maitra, U. Macromol.
Symp. 2006, 241, 60.
5. (a) Maitra, U.; Kumar, P. V.; Chandra, N.; D’Souza, L. J.; Prasannaa, M. D.; Raju, A.
R. Chem. Commun. 1999, 595; (b) Babu, P.; Sangeetha, N. M.; Vijaykumar, P.;
Maitra, U.; Rissanen, K.; Raju, A. R. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 1922; (c) Willemen, H.
M.; Vermonden, T.; Marcelis, A. T. M.; Sudhölter, E. J. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
2329; (d) Willemen, H. M.; Vermonden, T.; Marcelis, A. T. M.; Sudhölter, E. J. R.
Langmuir 2002, 18, 7102.
The morphologies of the xerogels were studied by scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) using a Zeiss EVO 50 scanning electron
microscope. The gels were first dried at room temperature and
then in a vacuum desiccator. The samples were coated with a thin
layer of gold before imaging. The SEM images revealed that the
xerogels of 6 from 1-heptanol and 1-octanol contained fibrous
aggregates ( Fig. 1b and d). The xerogel of 6 from 1-nonanol
(Fig. 1f) did not show such a clear fibrous structure but mere bulk-
ier formulations with large hollows inside. Although bile acids
themselves are chiral and pure optical isomers, no signature of
macroscopic chirality of the gels was visible. A close resemblance
in the packing pattern in the gel state, xerogel, and bulk solid
observed recently by us10 can open a way to design gels suitable
6. Valkonen, A.; Lahtinen, M.; Virtanen, E.; Kaikkonen, S.; Kolehmainen, E. Biosens.
Bioelectron. 2004, 20, 1233.