Identifying Inhibitors That Bind to Kinase Conformations
A R T I C L E S
region and are ATP-competitive but also extend deep into this
allosteric site, while Type III inhibitors bind exclusively within
the allosteric pocket.7,11
as well as ligands that may bind in the ATP site and induce
other conformational changes in target kinases not regulated
by the DFG-in/out switch, thereby making the FLiK approach
applicable to a larger number of kinases.
Although molecules that utilize this less-conserved site are
believed to have superior selectivity profiles and improved
pharmacological properties and may offer new opportunities for
drug development,6,12 approaches that could discriminate be-
tween different inhibitor types and identify inhibitors that
stabilize the inactive DFG-out conformation were not compatible
with high-throughput screening (HTS) formats used by academia
and industry.13 We previously developed a robust new binding
assay system (FLiK, Fluorescent Labels in Kinases), in which
we tagged the activation loop of cSrc and p38R kinases with
acrylodan,11,14 allowing for the direct measurement of the
dissociation constant (Kd), rate constant of association (kon), and
rate constant of dissociation (koff) of various ligands. More
recently, two additional binding assays based on the displace-
ment of prebound probes from p38R kinase were also reported:
one made use of a fluorophore-labeled inhibitor,15 and the other
employed an enzyme fragment complementation-based ap-
proach.16 In the latter case, a chemiluminescence read-out was
generated by the displacement of a prebound inhibitor-peptide
probe, which then complements and activates ꢀ-galactosidase
to catalyze a chemiluminescence reaction that serves as the assay
read-out. Although these approaches were demonstrated to be
suitable for determining the affinities of displacing ligands using
end point measurements, analysis of kinetic parameters (kon and
koff) is less straightforward since signal detection is rate-limited
by the well-characterized slow dissociation of the chosen
pyrazolourea-based probes from p38R.7
The FLiK approach has so far led to the identification of the
first reported Type III ligands of cSrc,11 identified a new Type
III binding mode for the thiazole-urea scaffold in p38R, and
also led to the identification of several unique Type I ligands
that stabilize the DFG-out conformation of p38R. The sensitivity
in detecting ligands that stabilize the DFG-out conformation is
significantly enhanced by using the FLiK approach to screen
compound libraries since it utilizes the unphosphorylated
inactive form of the kinase. However, manipulation of the
activation loop by mutation and subsequent fluorophore labeling
may not be tolerated by some kinases, may significantly alter
the DFG-in/out equilibrium, and could lead to significant
changes in the affinity of known inhibitors of the target kinase.
Moreover, there is still no method available for predicting
whether a kinase of interest can even adopt the DFG-out
conformation. Therefore, it would be useful to develop alterna-
tive labeling strategies for sensitively detecting DFG-out binders
Here we report on the development of a fluorescent-labeled
kinase assay system that takes advantage of cross-talk between
the activation loop and the glycine-rich loop of the kinase
domain (Figure 1). Aside from the activation loop, the glycine-
rich loop (or P-loop) is another highly conserved flexible
structural element located in the N-terminal lobe of kinases and
contains the canonical Gly-X-Gly-X-X-Gly motif (where X may
be any amino acid). Through the formation of a hydrophobic
interface, it is believed that these two loops interact with one
another (Figure 1a,b) and modulate the conformational equi-
librium of the kinase.9 This cross-talk is also partly mediated
by the nearby helix C in many kinases, which forms the “roof”
of the allosteric site available in the DFG-out conformation.17
Thus, the glycine-rich loop also serves as an important
determinant for inhibitor selectivity and affinity and responds
to movements in the activation loop induced by Type II and
Type III ligand binding within the allosteric site. Additionally,
the glycine-rich loop serves as a regulatory “flap” that controls
the entry of ATP and substrates into the ATP binding site18
and has been shown to change conformation with the binding
of some Type I inhibitors in the ATP binding pocket, thereby
increasing their affinity by shielding them from the surrounding
solvent.19,20
By labeling the glycine-rich loop of the serine-threonine
kinase p38R with acrylodan at a specific position within the
Gly-X-Gly-X-X-Gly motif, we were able to develop a kinase
biosensor that can detect the binding of inhibitors with different
binding modes. Type II and Type III inhibitors, which mediate
a conformational change in the glycine-rich loop via movement
of the activation loop to the DFG-out conformation, were easily
discriminated in HTS formats by monitoring time-dependent
changes in fluorescence signal or Kd over time, or in cuvettes
by measuring kon (<5 s for Type I binders). In addition to
achieving our primary goal of detecting Type II and Type III
inhibitors, this binding approach also sensitively detected Type
I ligands, which gain affinity by interacting directly with the
glycine-rich loop and, in some cases, also stabilize the DFG-
out conformation. We present several crystal structures of
compounds in complex with p38R and report a new binding
mode for quinazoline-based inhibitors identified solely with this
second-generation FLiK approach. Such information may prove
to be useful in further design and synthesis efforts to redirect
known scaffolds to inhibit inactive kinase conformations. We
propose this new FLiK approach as a useful method for
identifying new ligands for kinases that are not known to be
regulated by the DFG-in/-out equilibrium, a required feature
for the success of our original FLiK approach of labeling the
activation loop of kinases.11,14
(8) Backes, A. C.; Zech, B.; Felber, B.; Klebl, B.; Mu¨ller, G. Expert Opin.
Drug DiscoVery 2008, 3, 1427–1449.
(9) Wan, P. T.; Garnett, M. J.; Roe, S. M.; Lee, S.; Niculescu-Duvaz, D.;
Good, V. M.; Jones, C. M.; Marshall, C. J.; Springer, C. J.; Barford,
D.; Marais, R. Cell 2004, 116, 855–867.
(10) Nagar, B.; Bornmann, W. G.; Pellicena, P.; Schindler, T.; Veach, D. R.;
Miller, W. T.; Clarkson, B.; Kuriyan, J. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 4236–
4243.
(11) Simard, J. R.; Kluter, S.; Grutter, C.; Getlik, M.; Rabiller, M.; Rode,
H. B.; Rauh, D. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 394–396.
(12) Copeland, R. A.; Pompliano, D. L.; Meek, T. D. Nat. ReV. Drug
DiscoVery 2006, 5, 730–739.
(17) Eyers, P. A.; Churchill, M. E.; Maller, J. L. Cell Cycle 2005, 4, 784–
789.
(13) Annis, D. A.; Nazef, N.; Chuang, C. C.; Scott, M. P.; Nash, H. M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15495–15503.
(18) Tamayo, N.; Liao, L.; Goldberg, M.; Powers, D.; Tudor, Y. Y.; Yu,
V.; Wong, L. M.; Henkle, B.; Middleton, S.; Syed, R.; Harvey, T.;
Jang, G.; Hungate, R.; Dominguez, C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005,
15, 2409–2413.
(14) Simard, J. R.; Getlik, M.; Grutter, C.; Pawar, V.; Wulfert, S.; Rabiller,
M.; Rauh, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13286–13296.
(15) Tecle, H.; et al. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2009, 74, 547–559.
(16) Klu¨ter, S.; Gru¨tter, C.; Naqvi, T.; Rabiller, M.; Simard, J. R.; Pawar,
V.; Getlik, M.; Rauh, D. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 357–367.
(19) Hanks, S. K.; Hunter, T. FASEB J. 1995, 9, 576–596.
(20) Mapelli, M.; Massimiliano, L.; Crovace, C.; Seeliger, M. A.; Tsai,
L. H.; Meijer, L.; Musacchio, A. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 671–679.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 12, 2010 4153