with Brønsted base.9 Given their synthetic utilities and
potential bioactivity, we report herein the first enantioselec-
tive construction of spiro-dihydropyran architectures 4 via
a cinchona alkaloid-catalyzed domino Michael addition/
hemiacetalization reaction of cyclic ꢀ-oxo aldehydes 1 and
aromatic ꢀ,γ-unsaturated R-keto esters 2 (Scheme 1).10
(DHQD)2PYR (3e) was the most effective among catalysts
3b-e, furnishng 5a with 85% ee after oxidation (Table 1,
entry 5).14 The disadvantage of the free OH group in the
catalyst structure was verified by the poor enantioselectivity
of the reaction catalyzed by quindine (entry 2). Thus,
cinchona alkaloids did not act as dual-activating organo-
catalysts herein.15 The cyclization can be run in a variety of
solvents with comparable results (Table 1, entries 5-8).
However, we found the reaction to be slightly facilitated by
the presence of t-BuOH (entry 9) and chose Tol/t-BuOH (10:
1) for further exploration.
Scheme 1. Domino Reactions Employing Aldehyde Enolates
Table 1. Catalyst Screening and Optimization of Reaction
Conditionsa
The cyclization of 2-oxocyclohexanecarbaldehyde (1a)
with ꢀ,γ-unsaturated R-keto ester 2a was initially carried
out using 10 mol % catalyst loading of tertiary amines 3 in
toluene at -20 °C (Table 1). Upon treatment with DABCO,
a mixture of two anomers of hemiacetal 4a was obtained in
an 8:1 ratio as determined by 1HNMR analysis, which
afforded R-spiropyranone 5a as a single diastereomer after
PCC oxidation (entry 1).11 On the basis of these observations,
we decided to develop an asymmetric version of this
cyclization. As cinchona alkaloids are highly useful orga-
nocatalysts for a large number of stereoselective transforma-
tions,12 a brief survey of cinchona alkaloid-derived catalysts
was conducted for this process.13 As shown in Table 1,
time
(h)
4a, yieldb
5a, eec
entry
catalyst 3
solvent
(%)
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3e
3e
3e
3e
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
THF
48
48
78
87
59
70
76
65
73
72
89
45
64
78
85
84
82
87
95
48
48
48
48
CH2Cl2
EtOAc
36
(9) For a recent review on chiral Brønsted base catalyzed reaction, see:
Palomo, C.; Oiarbide, M.; Lo´pez, R. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2009, 38, 632.
(10) For reviews on organocatalytic domino reactions, see: (a) Grondal,
C.; Jeanty, M.; Enders, D. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 167. (b) Alba, A.-N.;
Companyo´, X.; Viciano, M.; Rios, R. Curr. Org. Chem. 2009, 13, 1432.
(c) Enders, D.; Grondal, C.; Hu¨ttl, M. R. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 1570. (d) Yu, X.; Wang, W. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2037.
(11) Attempts to determine the ee value of 4a directly proved unsuc-
cessful; therefore, product 4a was further oxidized to the corresponding
lactone derivative 5a. For synthesis of R-spiropyranone, see: (a) Kirillov,
N. F.; Gavrilov, A. G. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 44, 963. (b) Zou, Y.;
Wang, Q.; Goeke, A. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 5335.
144
48
Tol/t-BuOHd
a Reaction conditions: (i) 1a (0.4 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), and catalyst
3 (10 mol %) in solvent (2 mL) at -20 °C; (ii) PCC (1.5 equiv), DCM,
reflux. b Isolated yield of the mixture of two anomers 4a. c The ee value of
5a was determined by chiral HPLC. d Toluene/t-BuOH (10:1).
With the optimal reaction conditions, the scope of the
domino Michael/hemiacetalization reaction was probed by
using various R-keto esters (Table 2). Aromatic ꢀ,γ-
unsaturated R-keto esters 2 having both electron-donating
(Table 2, entries 2 and 3) and electron-withdrawing substit-
uents (Table 2, entries 4-6) can effectively be used in this
transformation; the substitution pattern of the arene had little
effect on the enantioselectivity of the reaction, although the
reactivity may be affected. Accordingly, the electron-poor
aryl R-keto esters displayed reactivity higher than that of
their electron-rich counterparts, producing the desired hemi-
acetals 4 in almost quantitatively yields (entries 4, 5 versus
(12) For reviews on chiral cinchona alkaloid catalysts, see: (a) Connon,
S. J. Chem. Commun. 2008, 2499. (b) Marcelli, T.; van Maarseveen, J. H.;
Hiemstra, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7496. (c) Tian, S.-K.; Chen,
Y. G.; Hang, J. F.; Tang, L.; McDaid, P.; Deng, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004,
37, 621. (d) Chen, Y. G.; McDaid, P.; Deng, L. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103,
2965.
(13) For selected examples of cinchona alkaloid catalyzed domino
reactions via other kinds of enolates except aldehyde enolates, see: (a)
Kaneko, S.; Yoshino, T.; Katoh, T.; Terashima, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54,
5471. (b) Dickmeiss, G; De Sio, V; Udmark, J; Poulsen, T. B; Marcos, V;
Jørgensen, K. A Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6650. (c) Li, L.; Ganesh,
M.; Seidel, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11648. (d) Tan, B.; Shi, Z.;
Chua, P. J.; Zhong, G. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3425. (e) Shi, Z.; Yu, P.; Chua,
P. J.; Zhong, G. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2797. (f) Zu, L.; Xie, H.; Li,
H.; Wang, J.; Jiang, W.; Wang, W. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1882. (g)
Zu, L.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Xie, H.; Jiang, W.; Wang, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 1036. (h) Wang, J.; Xie, H.; Li, H.; Zu, L.; Wang, W. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4177. (i) Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Deng, L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3928. (j) Wang, B.; Wu, F; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.;
Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 768. (k) Calter, M. A.; Wang, J.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2205.
(14) The absolute configuration of the tandem product was assigned by
a single-crystal X-ray analysis of 5a.
(15) For the first example, see: McDaid, P.; Chen, Y.; Deng, L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 338.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 10, 2010
2423