H. Yanai et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 2625–2628
2627
acylsilane giving rise to 2-fluoro-1,3-diketone mono-N,O-acetal 4 or
simple adduct 3 (Scheme 2).15 After numerous attempts, we
have established that the desired reaction proceeded nicely by
0.5 M equiv of sparteine and a strict control of the reaction temper-
ature brings about the selective formation of 4 or 3. For example,
after the defluorinative alkylation of 1a with n-BuLi in the presence
of 0.5 M equiv of sparteine in Et2O, the reactive intermediate was
treated with a solution of acetyltrimethylsilane in THF. Then, the
resultant mixture was warmed to 0 °C over 7 h to give 2-fluoro-
1,3-diketone mono-N,O-acetal 4a in 68% yield as an anti/syn mixture
in a ratio of 2.2:1.16 On the other hand, the reaction with acetyltri-
methylsilane below ꢀ24 °C selectively gave simple adduct 3af in
82%yieldas asole diastereomer. Moreover, thetreatmentof 3afwith
n-BuLi at ꢀ24 °C for 6 h in Et2O/THF mixed solvent resulted in the
clean formation of 4a in 81% yield. Likewise, by one-pot procedure,
trifluoroacetaldehyde N-benzyl-N,O-acetal 1b was converted to
the corresponding mono-fluoro product 4b in 55% yield. The forma-
tion of 2-fluoro-1,3-diketone mono-N,O-acetal 4 can be a conse-
quence of the 1,2-Brook rearrangement17,18 of lithium alkoxide
intermediate followed by mono-defluorination via b-elimination.
Finally, we examined the deprotection of N,O-acetal group.
n-BuLi (2.5 eq)
R
N
(-)-sparteine (0.5 eq)
Et2O, -78 ºC, 15 min;
O
R
n-Bu
N
O
F
CF3
Me
O
then MeCOSiMe3 (2.0 eq)
THF, -78 to 0 °C, 7 h
1a R = Allyl
1b R = Bn
4a 68% (anti/syn = 2.2 : 1)
4b 55% (anti/syn = 1.9 : 1)
n-BuLi (2.5 eq)
(-)-sparteine (0.5 eq)
Et2O, -78 ºC, 15 min;
n-BuLi
OH
4a
81%
R
n-Bu
N
O
Me
SiMe3
-24 °C, 6 h
then MeCOSiMe3 (2.0 eq)
THF, -24 °C, 4 h
F
F
3af 82% (sole isomer)
3bf 81% (dr = 37 : 1)
Scheme 2.
Moreover, the use of 2.0 M equiv of triethylamine as a mono amine
additive resulted in a poor yield of 3aa under the reaction at ꢀ78 °C
(entry 6).
To reveal the scope of the present sparteine-mediated synthesis
a,a-difluoro-b-hydroxyketone N,O-acetals, we carried out the
Since several acetals derived from a,a-difluoroketones or trifluoro-
of
methyl ketones are overwhelmingly stable compared to non-fluo-
rinated ketone acetals due to the electronic and stereoelectronic
effects by fluoro groups, deprotection of these fluorinated ketone
acetals under mild conditions is considerably difficult. However,
after several attempts, we found that N-benzyl-N,O-acetal group
can be removed by catalytic hydrogenolysis giving rise to
defluorinative alkylation of trifluoroacetaldehyde N,O-acetals fol-
lowed by the Reformatsky type C–C bond formation in the pres-
ence of stoichiometric amount of (ꢀ)-sparteine (Table 2). In the
case of methyllithium, the defluorinative methylation step of 1a
smoothly completed in a mixed solvent of Et2O and THF at
ꢀ24 °C within 15 min, then the one-pot treatment of the resultant
reaction mixture by cyclohexanecarbaldehyde rapidly gave the
carbinol product 3aa-Me in 86% yield (entry 1). In the presence
of sparteine, sterically hindered isopropyllithium could be also
used to give isopropyl ketone N,O-acetal 3aa-iPr in 79% by the
reaction of 1a for 4 h at ꢀ24 °C (entry 2). Interestingly, the diaste-
a,a-difluoroketones (Scheme 3). Thus, N-benzyl-N,O-acetal 3ba
was converted to the corresponding b-hydroxyketone 5a by the
reaction in a mixed solvent of MeOH and 10% aqueous HCl solution
under Pd/C-H2 conditions. In the absence of any palladium cata-
lysts, the starting material 3ba could not be converted to the ke-
tone 5a under such acidic conditions. This deprotecting
procedure could be applied to tertiary cyclohexanol 3bc and ben-
zylic alcohol 3bg without decomposition of these functionalities
reoselectivity in these three component syntheses of a,a-difluoro-
b-hydroxyketone N,O-acetals strongly depended on the steric bulk-
iness of the introduced alkyl group and the improvement of anti-
selectivity was observed by increasing the steric bulkiness of alkyl-
lithiums (entries 1, 2 and also see Table 1). Furthermore, pivalalde-
hyde performed as a nice electrophile and the corresponding
carbinol product 3ab was obtained in 80% yield (entry 3). It is
worth mentioning that the use of stoichiometric amount of sparte-
ine also resulted in the rate acceleration of the Reformatsky type
reaction using relatively low reactive ketones, which had required
both higher reaction temperature and prolonged reaction time in
the absence of sparteine. For example, the one-pot reaction of
the intermediate, which generated by defluorinative alkylation of
1a with n-BuLi, with ketones such as cyclohexanone, acetone and
acetophenone smoothly proceeded at ꢀ24 °C or at 0 °C to give
the corresponding tertiary alcohols 3ac, 3ad and 3ae in excellent
yields (entries 4–6). Likewise, this rate acceleration by sparteine
was observed in the reactions of N-benzyl and N-propyl N,O-acetal
substrates 1b and 1c (entries 7–10).
to give the corresponding
a,a-difluoro-b-hydroxyketones 5b and
5c in 81% and 86% yield, respectively.
In conclusion, we found that (ꢀ)-sparteine accelerates both the
defluorinative alkylation reaction of trifluoroacetaldehyde N,O-
acetals with alkyllithiums and the following Reformatsky type
C–C bond formation with carbonyl compounds. N-Benzyl-N,O-
acetal group of the obtained products can be removed under
palladium-catalyzed hydrogenolysis conditions to give the corre-
sponding
procedure is a useful and novel synthetic approach to functional-
ized -difluoroketones.
a,a-difluoro-b-hydroxyketones. The present two-step
a,a
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Mr. Hideyuki Mimura and
Dr. Kosuke Kawada (TOSOH F-TECH Inc.) for supplying trifluoro-
acetaldehyde hemiacetals.
Next, to show the useful extension of this sparteine-mediated
conditions, we examined the reaction of reactive intermediate with
Supplementary data
Pd/C (10 mol%)
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
OH
O
H2 (1 atm)
OH
Bn
n-Bu
N
O
R2
R2
n-Bu
R1
MeOH-aq.HCl
rt, 1-3 h
R1
F
F
References and notes
F
F
3ba R1 = c-C6H11, R2 = H
5a 99%
5b 81%
5c 86%
1. Amii, H.; Uneyama, K. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 2119.
2. Our papers in relation to defluorinative functionalization, see: (a) Okada, M.;
Nakamura, Y.; Saito, A.; Sato, A.; Horikawa, H.; Taguchi, T. Chem. Lett. 2002, 28;
(b) Okada, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Saito, A.; Sato, A.; Horikawa, H.; Taguchi, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5845; (c) Nakamura, Y.; Okada, M.; Sato, A.;
Horikawa, H.; Koura, M.; Saito, A.; Taguchi, T. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 5741.
3bc R1 = R2 = -CH2(CH2)3CH2-
3bg
R
1 = Ph, R2 = H
Scheme 3.