This failure to form Z5 has probably discouraged subse-
quent P.-B. studies of fused polycycles, as there is only a
partially relevant 1977 Paddon-Row’s account5a found in the
literatureslater confirmed by Coxon5bswhere a P.-B. chan-
nel competes with an all-carbon [2π+2π] photocyclization
in a hemicyclone-benzoquinone adduct.
We hypothesized that a modest increase in the ring size
of either the dienophile or diene could relieve the strain and
restore the Paterno`-Bu¨chi photoreactivity in fused polycyclic
systems of type Z3. Our Density Functional Theory (DFT)
calculations at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level confirmed that
oxetane Z5 relaxes by as much as 11 kcal/mol when its
cyclopentyl moiety is expanded by a single methylene group,
suggesting that the Diels-Alder (D.-A.) adducts of six-
membered and larger cycloalkenones can be P.-B. photore-
active.
monooxetane, unlike the similarly sized cyclohexano-nor-
bornene 1, which is photoactive. This further confirms that
flexibility of the ketone-containing ring is critical. Unlike 1,
the six-membered ring in 12 is further constrained by the
second rigidly fused norbornyl moiety.
According to our DFT calculations these polycyclic
oxetanes are still far more strained than their spiro counter-
parts (such as Z2 in Scheme 1). As such, they readily
undergo acid-catalyzed ring-opening and subsequent cationic
rearrangements, conforming to certain computationally pre-
dictable topologies consistent with the structure of the initial
polycyclic enone (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3
We now report that the D.-A. adducts of 2-cyclohexenone
and 2-cycloheptenone6 are indeed capable of forming strained
polycyclic oxetanes upon irradiation (Scheme 2).7 Strikingly,
even the bis-adduct of cyclohexadiene and benzoquinone 98
was found to be photoactive, producing C2-symmetric
dioxetane 11 via the monooxetane 10 when irradiated.
Scheme 2
When treated with HCl, oxetanes usually produce 1,3-
chlorohydrins. However, in the case of strained oxetanes 5-8
and 11, which can potentially open to form both tertiary or
secondary carbocations, the produced chlorohydrins resulted
from more elaborate cationic rearrangements.9
Relative stability of the tertiary cation depends on the
degree of its pyramidalization, which in these systems is
defined primarily by the size of the enone ring. Our rationale
is that for larger rings (m > 1) the acid-catalyzed oxetane
ring-opening preferentially produces the expected tertiary
cation of type A1, Scheme 4A. While relatively more stable
In the bis-series, the photoreactivity limit is reached with
the cyclopentadiene adduct 12, which does not form even a
(2) (a) Rawal, V. H.; Dufour, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2613–
2614. (b) Dvorak, C. A.; Dufour, C.; Iwasa, S.; Rawal, V. H. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 5302–5303.
(7) In a typical procedure, 3-10 mM solution of ene-one precursors
1-4, 9 in CH3CN (or benzene) was irradiated in a quartz tube in the Rayonet
reactor equipped with RPR-3000 UV lamps (broadband 250-350 nm UV
source with peak emission at 300 nm) for 24-72 h. Conversion was
monitored by NMR, the oxetanes were used without further purification.
Oxetanes 5-8, 10-11 have a very characteristic low field multiplet at
4.0-4.5 ppm, W1/2 ≈ 7 Hz. We also were able to accurately calculate their
NMR spectrassee SI. Attempts to further purify reaction mixtures by
column chromatography were mainly unsuccessful, as the strained polycyclic
oxetanes 5-8 are not stable on silica gel, producing varying amounts of
rearranged products.
(3) Valiulin, R. A.; Kutateladze, A. G. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3886–3889.
(4) Pe´rez-Ruiza, R.; Miranda, M. A.; Alleb, R.; Meerholzb, K.;
Griesbeck, A. G. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2006, 5, 51–55.
(5) (a) Warrener, R. N.; McCay, I. W; Paddon-Row, M. N. Aust.
J. Chem. 1977, 30, 89–94. (b) Coxon, J. M.; O’Connell, M. J.; Steel, P. J.
Aust. J. Chem. 1986, 39, 1537–1557.
(6) Synthesis of D.-A. adducts 1-4, 9, 12 is described in the literature:
(a) Fringuelli, F.; Guo, M.; Minuti, L.; Pizzo, F.; Taticchi, A.; Wenkert, E.
J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 710–712. (b) Northrup, A. B.; MacMillan, D. W. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2458–2460. (c) Rathore, R.; Kochi, J. J.
Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4399–4411.
(8) see Rathore, R.; Kochi, J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4399–4411.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 15, 2010
3399