M. Lizarzaburu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 5942–5947
5945
Table 4
SAR exploration of A-ring
ence of 100% human serum (502 nM, 100% Emax) and stimulated
insulin secretion from isolated mouse islets (2.7
M, 88% Emax).7
l
Next the influence of the pyridone ring on GPR142 activity in
buffer and in the presence of 100% human serum was investigated
(Table 3). Replacement of the pyridone with a pyrimidine ring (19)
provided a compound with only a fourfold reduction in in vitro po-
tency (360 nM). This indicated that the pyridone amide was not
essential for potency and would allow manipulations in this area
of the molecule. Next, the pyridone ring was replaced with a phe-
nyl ring (20). Although the phenyl ring retained a good level of po-
tency, it was observed that a reduction of polarity in this part of the
molecule resulted in a compound with a greater shift in the pres-
ence of 100% human serum. Addition of polarity to compound 20
in an attempt to reduce the serum shift was next explored. The
electron rich 6-methoxy phenyl 21 was equipotent to compound
20; and the 5-methoxyphenyl 22 was slightly more potent than
compound 20, however both of these derivatives had a high serum
shift when compared to compound 18. A methoxy group at the 4
position of the phenyl ring (23) proved to be detrimental to the po-
tency. Placing a carboxylic acid at the 5 position of the phenyl ring
(24) slightly diminished the potency but kept the shift in human
serum low, similar to that of compound 18.
It is known that unencumbered basic nitrogens of heterocycles,
in particular pyridines and imidazoles, bind to the heme portion of
CYP enzymes, causing inhibition which can lead to undesirable
drug-drug interactions.8 As suspected, compounds 18 and 20,
which both contained a sterically unencumbered pyridine, had
high levels of CYP inhibition (Table 4). With this in mind, it was
decided to look for a replacement of the A-ring pyridine first with
the synthetically more accessible phenyl B-ring and subsequently
combine the most interesting A-rings with the pyridone B-ring
(Table 4). To test the hypothesis that the pyridine ring was the ma-
jor cause of the CYP inhibition, it was replaced with a phenyl ring
(32) or completely removed (25). As predicted, compound 32 had a
dramatic reduction in CYP inhibition when compared to compound
20. Complete removal of the phenyl ring (25) reduced the CYP inhi-
bition even further when compared to compounds 20. While both
changes successfully reduced CYP inhibition, the GPR142 activity
was also significantly reduced.
Next, 2-substituted pyridines were investigated in the hope that
the steric bulk would reduce the CYP inhibition. Indeed, the 2-
methyl pyridine A-ring (26) not only improved the potency
(52 nM), but also led to a moderate reduction in the CYP inhibition.
The 2-amino pyridine A-ring 27 had a significant reduction in CYP
inhibition but also had a slight loss in potency. Next, a series of
compounds in which the pyridine A-ring was replaced with a pyr-
azole were evaluated. The 3-substituted 1-methyl-1H-pyrazole 28
had lower CYP inhibition, but was much less potent than 20. On the
other hand, the 5-substituted 1H-pyrazole 29 had a good balance
of potency (67 nM) and reduced CYP inhibition as compared to
compound 20. The 4-substituted 1-methyl-1H-pyrazole 30 was
three times less potent than 20, and, much like 3-substituted 1-
methyl-1H-pyrazole 28, had lower CYP inhibition than 20. The 4-
substituted 1H-pyrazole 31 was also three times less potent than
20, but in this case did not lower the CYP inhibition.
Next, the A-rings which gave the best balance of high potency
and low CYP inhibition in the phenyl B-ring series were combined
with the pyridone B-ring. It was gratifying to see that the 2-methyl
pyridine A-ring (33) improved the potency slightly (67 nM) com-
pared to compound 18. As expected, this change dramatically re-
duced the level of CYP inhibition. More interestingly, compound
33 had a significantly lower level of CYP inhibition than the corre-
sponding analogue with the phenyl B-ring (26). This is presumably
due to an increase in the polarity of the pyridone ring (ClogP of
33 = 1.39) versus the phenyl ring (ClogP of 26 = 3.6). The pyrazole
ring was also explored in combination with the pyridone B-ring,
O
N
H
N
S
B
N
H
A
Compound A–ring
B–ring
h-GPR142, IP
Cyp Inh. (3 lM)
3A4/2D6 (%)
a,b
EC50
(
l
M)
20
0.067
97/95
N
25
26
27
28
H
3.3
24/36
63/74
38/42
30/12
0.052
0.21
1.9
N
N
H2N
N
N
H
N
29
0.067
59/36
N
N
30
31
32
0.18
0.18
0.64
36/42
82/90
57/46
N
N
HN
H
N
O
O
O
O
18
33
34
35
0.093
0.067
0.20
97/95
22/20
18/29
24/21
N
N
H
N
H
H
N
N
N
H
N
N
0.23
N
a
Ref. 5 for assay protocol.
b
Standard deviation for assay based on control compound was 30%.
With the phenylalanine side chain now initially explored, atten-
tion was turned to the phenylalanine amine (Table 2). The impor-
tance of the phenylalanine amine was first explored by synthesis of
the desamino derivative (13) and by eliminating the basicity of the
amine via acetamide formation (14). Both of these changes lead to
a complete loss of potency (>33 lM). It was pleasing to find that a
mono alkyl substituent on the phenylalanine nitrogen gave a sig-
nificant improvement in activity, including derivatives with cyclo-
lM), benzyl (16, 0.83 lM) and phenethyl
(17, 0.78 M). Along these lines, and with a desire to incorporate
propylmethyl (15, 0.76
l
more polar substituents, N-methyl thiazole 18 was identified,
which provided an h-GRP142 agonist with potency of 93 nM and
an Emax of 120%. Compound 18 also had good potency in the pres-