hoxymethyl (CEM) protecting group and have succeeded in
preparing a 110mer precursor miRNA using this method.10,11
Apart from these efforts, there have been few reports of novel
technology for rapid purification, which would avoid cleav-
age and/or migration of the resulting RNA strand caused by
the tedious purification procedure. To this end, Olejnik et
al. developed a rapid purification of DNA using a non-
nucleosidic photocleavable biotin phosphoramidite.12 In their
approach, the phosphoramidite is incorporated at the 5′-end
of the DNA strand, so that the resulting 5′-end biotin-labeled
DNA can be selectively isolated from the undesired shorter
DNA fragments by incubation with immobilized streptavidin.
After irradiation with UV light, the photocleavable biotin
moiety at the 5′-end is cleaved to afford the desired DNA
strand. This approach is ingenious for a rapid purification;
however, the resulting DNA strand is inevitably 5′-phos-
phorylated. Fang and Bergstrom reported an RNA synthesis
using a similar strategy based on biotin-avidin interaction.13
In their method, the biotin group is introduced at the 5′-end
of the resulting oligoRNA via a silyl acetal linkage, neces-
sitating the ACE-protected phosphoramidite units,6 and thus
requires unusual reaction conditions in solid-phase RNA
synthesis.
temperature (t1/2 estimated to be 12 h), whereas under 0.05
M K2CO3 in MeOH, it was converted into a 4-methoxypy-
rimidine nucleoside (t1/2 estimated to be 1.3 h). Thus, it was
concluded that incorporation of the functional group at the
uracil moiety was not suitable for our approach (data not
shown).
We next planed to introduce the photocleavable group at
the 2′-position via an acetal linkage, which can be introduced
selectively into the desired position and will not migrate to
the 3′-position during further chemical conversion, and which
works as a protecting group. The synthesis of the phos-
phoramidite unit possessing a biotinylated photocleavable
group is shown in Schemes 1 and 2. Starting with 5-methyl-
Scheme 1
In view of the apparent limitations of existing methods,
we report herein a new approach toward a convenient RNA
synthesis. Our approach consists of the synthesis of a
phosphoramidite possessing a biotinylated photocleavable
group at the 2′-position, its incorporation into the 5′-end of
the RNA strand under the usual reaction conditions in solid-
phase RNA synthesis, and selective isolation by means of
the biotin-streptavidin interaction, followed by photocleav-
age to afford the desired RNA strand pure enough for RNAi
experiments.
In order to simplify our proposed approach, the type and
introduction of a biotinylated photocleavable group in the
phosphoramidite unit initially had to be considered. We first
planned to introduce the photocleavable group at the nucleo-
base moiety, according to the report by Ho¨bartner and
Silverman.14 The uridine derivative 1 was prepared, as shown
in Figure 1. Prior to conversion into the corresponding
2-nitrobenzoic acid (2), we prepared compound 3 in four
steps.15 The bromo group of 3 was then converted to an azido
group to afford 4. Methylthiomethylation of 4 was achieved
by treatment with acetic anhydride in a mixture of dimethyl
sulfoxide and acetic acid to afford 5,16 which was introduced
into the 2′-position of the uridine derivative 6 (Scheme 2).
Thus, a mixture of 5, 6, and N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) in THF
was treated with trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TfOH) at
-40 °C, and the 1,1,3,3-tetraisopropyldisiloxane-1,3-diyl
(TIPDS) group of the crude product was removed by
ammonium fluoride to give 7 in 81% yield in two steps. The
5′-hydroxyl group was then protected by the dimethoxytrityl
(DMTr) group, and the azido group of the resulting 8 was
reduced by Ph3P in the presence of H2O under reflux to give
9. In order to introduce a biotin unit, compound 9 was treated
with 1017 in the presence of O-(benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-
tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HBTU), 1-hy-
(5) Pitsch, S.; Weiss, P. A.; Jenny, L.; Stutz, A.; Wu, X. HelV. Chem.
Acta 2001, 84, 3773–3795.
(6) Scaringe, S. A.; Wincott, F. E.; Caruthers, M. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 11820–11821.
(7) Semenyuk, A.; Foldesi, A.; Johansson, T.; Estmer-Nilsson, C.;
Blomgren, P.; Bra¨nnvall, M.; Kirsebom, L. A.; Kwiatkowski, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12356–12357.
(8) Lackey, J. G.; Sabatino, D.; Damha, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 789–
792.
(9) Gieœlak, J.; Grajkowski, A.; Kauffman, J. S.; Duff, R. J.; Beaucage,
S. L. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2774–2783.
(10) Ohgi, T.; Masutomi, Y.; Ishiyama, K.; Kitagawa, H.; Shiba, Y.;
Yano, J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3477–3480.
Figure 1. 2′-O-Methyluridine possessing a photocleavable group
(11) Shiba, Y.; Masuda, H.; Watanabe, N.; Ego, T.; Takagaki, K.;
Ishiyama, K.; Ohgi, T.; Yano, J. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 3287–3296.
(12) Olejnik, J.; Krzymanska-Olejnik, E.; Rothschild, K. J. Nucleic Acids
Res. 1996, 24, 361–366.
in its nucleobase moiety.
(13) Fang, S.; Bergstrom, D. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7987–7990.
(14) Ho¨bartner, C.; Silverman, S. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
7305–7309.
phosphoramidite unit, the stability of 1 against conditions
used in solid-phase RNA synthesis had to be addressed. As
a result, 1 was converted into 2′-O-methylcytidine when it
was treated with concentrated NH4OH/EtOH (3:1) at room
(15) Saran, D.; Burke, D. H. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 275–279.
(16) Pojer, P. M.; Angyal, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 17, 3067–3068.
(17) Zhong, M.; Strobel, S. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 55–58.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 17, 2010
3837