124
A.A.A. Emara / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 77 (2010) 117–125
to the G-factor by the expression G = (gꢀ − 2)/(g⊥ − 2) = 4. According
centers in the solid state is negligible, on the other hand, when
G < 4, a considerable exchange interaction is indicated. The G value
of the complex (0.965) suggests the exchange coupling between
Cu(II) centers in the solid state [51]. The powder ESR spectrum of
Cu(II) complexes is typical of the octahedral [52]. The value of the
magnetic moment (1.81 B.M), beside, the spectral data (712 nm)
agrees well with the proposed structures.
Oxovanadium(IV) complex (7) (ꢀeff = 1.41 B.M. at room temper-
ature) exhibits three bands, g1 = 2.1081, g2 = 2.041 and g3 = 2.144
(Fig. 3b). The resolution of the ESR spectra may be due to superex-
change interaction between two oxovanadium(IV) ions which lead
to a configuration in which the two electron spins have an anti-
ferromagnetic character. The shape of the spectrum as well as the
spectral studies agreed with the square pyramid structure.
Thermal gravimetric analysis for [Fe2(L)(NO3)2]·2H2O (5) and
[Cr2(L)(NO3)2]·3H2O (6) complexes were obtained to give informa-
tion concerning the thermal stability of the complex and to decide
whether the water molecules are in the inner or outer coordina-
tion sphere of the central metal ion [37,53]. TGA/DrTGA studies
were carried out from 25 to 800 ◦C, which showed four stages of
weight loss and the complete decomposition at 670 ◦C. TGA for the
Fe(III) complex showed a weight loss at 90 ◦C for the two water
molecules, Calcd. (Found)%; 5.68 (5.69)%, also, the first stage in the
4. Conclusions
In the present study, the Schiff base, H2L, ligand is dibasic with
two sets of N3O-tetradentate sites. The Schiff base, H2L, ligand
was allowed to react with copper(II), nickel(II), cobalt(II), zinc(II),
cadmium(II), iron(III), chromium(III), oxovanadium(IV) and diox-
ouranium(VI) ions, with 1:2 molar ratio (ligand:metal ion). All
reactions afforded binuclear complexes except cadmium(II) for
H2L, which gave oily product which was difficult to isolate. For this
ligand, nickel(II) complex exhibits a square planar geometry and
zinc(II) complex exhibits tetrahedral geometry while copper(II),
cobalt(II), iron(III) and chromium(III) complexes exhibit an octa-
hedral geometry which contain coordinated nitrate ions as either
unidentate or bidentate ligands. The oxovanadium(IV) complex
showed a square pyramidal geometry and dioxouranium(VI) com-
plex is an octahedral. The bonding sites are the azomethine nitrogen
and the amino nitrogen atoms and the phenolic oxygen atoms. The
ligand and its metal complexes enhanced a significant antimicro-
bial activity compared with standard antifungal and antibacterial
agents.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
From the interpretation of elemental analysis and infrared,
electronic spectra, ESR and molar conductivity, it is possible
to draw up the tentative structures of the transition metal
complexes. Fig. 4 depicts the representative structures of the metal
complexes.
[1] M. Shebl, Spectrochim. Acta (A) 70 (2008) 850.
[2] M. Hobady, T.D. Smith, Coord. Chem. Rev. 311 (1972) 9.
[3] G. Cerchiaro, A.M.D.C. Ferreira, J. Brazil. Chem. Soc. 17 (2006) 1473.
[4] P.G. Cozzi, Chem. Soc. Rev. 33 (2004) 410.
[5] S.E. Denmark, J.R. Heemstra, G.L. Beutner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 44 (2005)
4682.
[6] W. Huang, S. Gou, D. Hu, S. Chantrapromma, H.-K. Fun, Q. Meng, Inorg. Chem.
40 (2001) 1712.
[7] W. Kaim, B. Schwederski, Bioinorganic Chemistry: Inorganic Elements in the
3.3. Antimicrobial activity
The Schiff base, H2L, ligand and its metal complexes were eval-
uated for antimicrobial activity against two strain Gram-positive
bacteria (S. aureus and S. pyogenes), Gram-negative bacteria (P.
fluorescens and P. phaseolicola) and fungus (F. oxysporum and A.
fumigatus). The obtained antimicrobials are presented in Table 5.
The Schiff base, H2L, ligand was found to be biologically active.
Table 5 shows, also, that all metal complexes exhibit antimicro-
bial activity in one or more strain and enhanced it comparing
with the parent Schiff base. Although Ni(II) complex (2) showed
high activity as antimicrobial activity, the Cr(III) complex (6)
showed a dramatic low activity for all Gram-positive, Gram-
negative and fungi. Uranyl complex (8) showed high activity in
Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in high and low concen-
trations and intermediate activity for fungi cases. Fe(III) complex
(5) showed high activity in fungi only and intermediate activity for
bacteria.
It is known that the chelation tends to make the ligand acts as
more powerful and potent bacterial agent. A possible explanation
for this increase in the activity upon chelation is that, in chelated
complex, the positive charge of the metal is partially shared with
donor atoms present on the ligands and there is an electron delo-
calization over the whole chelated ring. This, in turn, increases the
lipoid layers of the bacterial membranes. Generally, it is suggested
that the chelated complexes deactivate various cellular enzymes,
which play a vital role in various metabolic pathways of these
microorganisms. Other factors such as solubility, conductivity and
dipole moment, which affected by the presence of metal ions, which
may also be possible reasons for increasing the biological activity
of the metal complexes as compared to the ligand from which they
are derived.
[8] O. Atakol, H. Nazir, C. Arici, S. Durmus, I. Svoboda, H. Fuess, Inorg. Chim. Acta
342 (2003) 295.
[9] S. Kita, H. Furutachi, H. Okawa, Inorg. Chem. 38 (1999) 4038.
[10] A.M. Ramadan, W. Sawadny, R.M. Issa, H.Y.F. El-baradie, Egypt J. Chem. 43
(2000) 285.
[11] Z.H. Chohan, H. Pervez, A. Rauf, A. Scozzafava, C.T. Supuran, J. Enzyme Inhib.
Med. Chem. 17 (2002) 122.
[12] Y.-L. Sang, X.-S. Lin, J. Coord. Chem. 63 (2010) 315.
[13] M. Rajasekar, S. Sreedaran, R. Prabu, V. Narayanan, R. Jegadeesh, N. Raaman,
K.A. Rahiman, J. Coord. Chem. 63 (2010) 136.
[14] C. Demetgül, M. Karakaplan, S. Selahattin, M. Dig˘rak, J. Coord. Chem. 62 (2009)
3544.
[15] L. Shi, W.-J. Mao, Y. Yang, H.-L. Zhu, J. Coord. Chem. 62 (2009) 3471.
[16] A.D. Kulkarni, G.B. Bagihalli, S.A. Patil, P.S. Badami, J. Coord. Chem. 62 (2009)
3060.
[17] A.D. Kulkarni, P.G. Avaji, G.B. Bagihalli, S.A. Patil, P.S. Badami, J. Coord. Chem.
62 (2009) 481.
[18] F.T. Elmali, A. Peksel, N. Demirhan, J. Coord. Chem. 62 (2009) 2548.
[19] V.B. Badwaik, R.D. Deshmukh, A.S. Aswar, J. Coord. Chem. 62 (2009) 2037.
[20] R.M. Issa, S.A. Azim, A.M. Khedr, D.F. Draz, J. Coord. Chem. 62 (2009) 1859.
[21] S.-P. Xu, L. Shi, P.-C. Lv, R.-Q. Fang, H.-L. Zhu, J. Coord. Chem. 62 (2009) 2048.
[22] N. Nishat, S. Rahis-Ud-Din, Dhyani, J. Coord. Chem. 62 (2009) 996.
[23] M.S. Refat, I.M. El-Deeny, Z.M. Anwer, S. El-Ghol, J. Coord. Chem. 62 (2009) 1709.
[24] N. Raman, S. Johnson Raja, A. Sakthivel, J. Coord. Chem. 62 (2009) 691.
[25] A.A.A. Emara, H.S. Seleem, A.M. Madyan, J. Coord. Chem. 62 (2009) 2569.
[26] A.A.A. Emara, A.A.A. Abou-Hussen, Spectrochim. Acta (A) 64 (2006) 1010.
[27] H.A. Flaschka, EDTA Titration, 2nd ed., Pergamon Press, New York, 1964, pp.
81–86.
[28] A.I. Vogel, Textbook of Quantitative Inorganic Analysis, 4th ed., Longman, Lon-
don, 1978.
[29] T.S. West, Complexometry with EDTA and Related Reagents, 3rd ed., DBH Ltd.,
Pools, London, 1969.
[30] F.E. Mabbs, D.T. Machin, Magnetism and Transition Metal Complexes, Chapman
and Hall, London, 1973, pp. 5–6.
[31] A.W. Bauer, W.W.M. Kirby, J.C. Sherris, M. Turck, Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 45 (1966)
493.
[32] D.C. Gross, S.E. De Vay, Physiol. Plant Pathol. 11 (1977) 13.
[33] H. William, V. Stephen, Theory and Application of Microbiological Assay, Aca-
demic Press, San Diego, 1989, p. 320.