C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
corresponding to a doubly oxygenated product which disappears as
the reaction proceeds. The peak at m/z 516.1 is consistent with either
a sulfinato (RSO2-) complex or a persulfenate species analogous to
that seen for CDO. A sulfenato (RSO-) complex is not observed.
Attempts to crystallographically characterize 2 after O2 addition were
unsuccessful. However, demetalation and acid hydrolysis (1 M HCl),
followed by quantitative reversed-phase HPLC (H2O/CH3CN 95/5,
0.1% TFA), show that the expected oxygenated organic fragment
2-H2N-C6H4SO3H is formed in good yield (60%). These data confirm
that S-oxygenation occurs upon reaction of O2 with 1. EPR spectra at
15 K of mixtures of 1 + O2 reveal a signal for high-spin FeIII (g 4.3),
but double integration shows this signal accounts for less than 5 (
2% of the total iron content. The lack of a significant EPR signal
indicates a +2 oxidation state for 2. Quantitation with 1,10-phenan-
throline yields a total FeII content of 91% after O2 addition (see
Supporting Information).
pathways can be envisioned.1e However, synthesis of the redox-
inert ZnII analog [Zn(LN3S)(OTf)] (4) provides some initial
insights.5 Exposure of 4 to O2 for up to 7 d at 25 °C (eq 1) gives
no reaction as determined by 1H NMR and LDIMS. Thus the
requirement for iron(II), the native metal in CDO, appears to be
critical for the S-oxygenation of 1.
There are only a few reports of O2-mediated S-oxygenation of
FeIII-SR complexes.6,7
However, prior to the present study, the
reaction of O2 with FeII-SR complexes has led only to the formation
of FeIII-O-FeIII complexes, in lieu of S-oxygenates.8
Interestingly,
Darensbourg observed that the site of O-capture (Fe vs S) in the
reaction of FeII-SR + O2 resulted in the exclusive selection of Fe
over S.8a
Our findings establish that an Fe
II-SR complex, in the
appropriate ligand environment, can selectively react with O2 to yield
S-oxygenates. Further examination of 1 and related complexes should
provide new, general insights regarding Fe/S/O2 reactivity.
Further support for the identity of 2 comes from the synthesis
of a close analog. A template reaction with FeIICl2, the unsym-
metrical ketone 2-H2NsC6H4SO3H, and Et3N followed by recrys-
tallization from CH3CN/iPr2O affords [FeII(LN3SO3)(Cl)] (3) (Figure
2). The sulfonato group coordinates as expected to the FeII center,
completing a distorted square pyramidal geometry (τ ) 0.33) with
the N and Cl donors. Thus complex 3 is a reasonable structural analog
of the sulfonato product 2 proposed in Scheme 1.
Acknowledgment. The NIH (GM62309) is gratefully acknowl-
edged for financial support. We thank Prof. S. Michel, S. J. Lee,
and J. Michalek for assistance with HPLC.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, spectra,
and crystallographic data for complexes 1, 3, and 4. This material is
Isotopic labeling studies provide important mechanistic information
regarding the oxygenation reaction. Addition of 18O2 (98%) to 1 results
in fully labeled [FeII(LN3S18O3)]+ (Figure 3). In contrast, no 18O
incorporation is observed when the reaction is run in the presence of
excess H218O. Thus O2 is the source of S-oxygenation in 2, which
parallels the results obtained from 18O-labeling studies with CDO.1f
Two mechanistic possibilities for the formation of complex 2 are (1)
incorporation of an intact molecule of O2 before or after the addition
of a single O atom (2 + 1 case) or (2) single O atom addition for all
three sulfonato oxygens (1 + 1 + 1 case). Reaction of 1 with a mixture
of 18O2/16O2 (∼49:51), followed by LDIMS and statistical simulation
of the isotopic distribution pattern in 2, provides a means for
distinguishing these two possibilities.4 Simulations of the isotopic
envelope show that the 2 + 1 mechanism is the dominant pathway
(Figures 3 and S1). This pathway indicates that a dioxygenase-type
reaction is occurring, as seen for CDO. The failure to detect a singly
oxygenated sulfenato complex at earlier reaction times suggests that
the third O atom is incorporated after dioxygenation, not before.
References
(1) (a) McCoy, J. G.; Bailey, L. J.; Bitto, E.; Bingman, C. A.; Aceti, D. J.; Fox,
B. G.; Phillips, G. N., Jr. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 3084–
3089. (b) Simmons, C. R.; Liu, Q.; Huang, Q. Q.; Hao, Q.; Begley, T. P.;
Karplus, P. A.; Stipanuk, M. H. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 18723–18733.
(c) Ye, S.; Wu, X.; Wei, L.; Tang, D. M.; Sun, P.; Bartlam, M.; Rao, Z. H.
J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 3391–3402. (d) Pierce, B. S.; Gardner, J. D.; Bailey,
L. J.; Brunold, T. C.; Fox, B. G. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 8569–8578. (e)
Joseph, C. A.; Maroney, M. J. Chem. Commun. 2007, 3338–3349. (f)
Simmons, C. R.; Krishnamoorthy, K.; Granett, S. L.; Schuller, D. J.; Dominy,
J. E., Jr.; Begley, T. P.; Stipanuk, M. H.; Karplus, P. A. Biochemistry 2008,
47, 11390–11392. (g) Kleffmann, T.; Jongkees, S. A. K.; Fairweather, G.;
Wilbanks, S. M.; Jameson, G. N. L. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 14, 913–
921. (h) de Visser, S. P.; Straganz, G. D. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 1835–
1846.
(2) Metal complexes of bis(imino)pyridine ligands are of interest for a wide
range of applications. (a) Scott, J.; Gambarotta, S.; Korobkov, I.; Budzelaar,
P. H. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13019–13029. (b) Gibson, V. C.;
Redshaw, C.; Solan, G. A. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 1745–1776. (c) Manuel,
T. D.; Rohde, J. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15582–15583. (d) Scho¨ffel,
J.; Rogachev, A. Y.; DeBeer George, S.; Burger, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 4734–4738. (e) Russell, S. K.; Darmon, J. M.; Lobkovsky, E.;
Chirik, P. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 2782–2792.
(3) Krishnamurthy, D.; Sarjeant, A. N.; Goldberg, D. P.; Caneschi, A.; Totti,
F.; Zakharov, L. N.; Rheingold, A. L. Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11, 7328–7341,
and references therein.
(4) (a) Farmer, P. J.; Solouki, T.; Mills, D. K.; Soma, T.; Russell, D. H.;
Reibenspies, J. H.; Darensbourg, M. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4601–
4605. (b) Farmer, P. J.; Solouki, T.; Soma, T.; Russell, D. H.; Darensbourg,
M. Y. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 4171–4172. (c) Grapperhaus, C. A.;
Darensbourg, M. Y.; Sumner, L. W.; Russell, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 1791–1792.
(5) For an example of Zn-thiolate oxidation by O2, see: Chohan, B. S.; Shoner,
S. C.; Kovacs, J. A.; Maroney, M. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 7726–7734.
(6) (a) Heinrich, L.; Li, Y.; Vaissermann, J.; Chottard, G.; Chottard, J. C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3526–3528. (b) Noveron, J. C.; Olmstead, M. M.;
Mascharak, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3247–3259. (c) Galardon,
E.; Giorgi, M.; Artaud, I. Chem. Commun. 2004, 286–287. (d) O’Toole,
M. G.; Kreso, M.; Kozlowski, P. M.; Mashuta, M. S.; Grapperhaus, C. A.
J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 13, 1219–1230.
The role of the FeII ion in the S-oxygenation of 1 is not yet
known, and mechanisms that involve both redox and nonredox
(7) S-Oxygenation by O2 has been observed for Fe(NO)x(SR)y complexes, but
assigning formal oxidation states to the metal in these cases is not
practical. (a) Lee, C. M.; Hsieh, C. H.; Dutta, A.; Lee, G. H.; Liaw, W. F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11492–11493. (b) Chen, H. W.; Lin, C. W.;
Chen, C. C.; Yang, L. B.; Chiang, M. H.; Liaw, W. F. Inorg. Chem. 2005,
44, 3226–3232.
(8) (a) Musie, G.; Lai, C. H.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Sumner, L. W.; Darensbourg,
M. Y. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 4086–4093. (b) Theisen, R. M.; Shearer, J.;
Kaminsky, W.; Kovacs, J. A. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 7682–7690.
Figure 3. Oxygen isotope studies using LDIMS. 18O2/16O2 (∼49/51)
mixture (left) and 18O2 (98%) (right). Exptl (black), simulation (red).
JA105591Q
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 35, 2010 12215