4804
M. O. Duffey et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 4800–4804
Maitland, N.; Chenevix-Trench, G.; Riggins, G. J.; Bigner, D. D.; Palmieri, G.;
As significant potency gains had been made in the chemical ser-
Cossu, A.; Flanagan, A.; Nicholson, A.; Ho, J. W. C.; Leung, S. Y.; Yuen, S. T.;
Weber, B. L.; Seigler, H. F.; Darrow, T. L.; Paterson, H.; Marais, R.; Marshall, C. J.;
Wooster, R.; Stratton, M. R.; Futreal, P. A. Nature 2002, 417, 949.
4. Hingorani, S. R.; Jacobetz, M. A.; Robertson, G. P.; Herlyn, M.; Tuveson, D. A.
Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 5198.
5. Flaherty, K.; Puzanov, I.; Sosman, J.; Kim, K.; Ribas, A.; McArthur, G.; Lee, R. J.;
Grippo, J. F.; Nolop, K.; Chapman, P. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 15s.
6. (a) Raf activity was determined using a 384 well streptavidin coated flashplate.
Reactions were performed with biotinylated peptide substrate at 30 °C for 3 h
ies, an evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of the series
became a priority (Table 6). While insolubility of 2 prevented us
from formulating it for IV dosing, we were pleased to find that
modification of the scaffold improved solubility sufficiently to al-
low most compounds to be formulated for IV dosing. When dosing
in rats (IV and PO)15 in general, non-fluorinated analogues suffered
from high clearance or low bioavailability, or both. This, in turn, led
to low plasma exposures (17, 12). Fortuitously, the addition of fluo-
ride to the phenol ring led to compounds that possess higher bio-
availability and lower rates of clearance from plasma than their
non-fluorinated counterparts. This resulted in a marked increase
in plasma exposures (30, 25). In particular, the tetrahydroisoquin-
oline analogue should be highlighted (39). It is an example of a
fluorinated analogue that possesses low clearance and high bio-
availability resulting in the highest plasma exposure levels we ob-
served in this study. In contrast, region B analogues all showed
poor pk properties, with or without incorporation of the C-1 fluo-
rophenol (data not shown).
in a final volume of 30 lL. After addition of stop the reaction was incubated on
a flashplate for 2 h. The flashplates were read on a Topcount counter.; (b) The
whole cell ELISA assay utilized a human melanoma cell line (A375) possessing
the mutation BRaf V600E. A375 cells seeded overnight were incubated with Raf
inhibitors for 3 h. At the end of the incubation, the cells were fixed,
permeabilized, blocking buffer added and the plates were incubated
overnight. After the blocking buffer was discarded, the plates were incubated
with anti-phospho-ERK antibody for 1 h followed by treatment with anti-horse
radish peroxidase. Optical density was read at 650 nm for
tetramethylbenzidine as substrate.
7. Blackburn, C.; Duffey, M. O.; Gould, A. E.; Kulkarni, B.; Liu, J. X.; Menon, S.;
Nagayoshi, M.; Vos, T. J.; Williams, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 4795.
8. Wan, P. T. C.; Garnett, M. J.; Roe, S. M.; Lee, S.; Niculescu-Duvaz, D.; Good, V.
M.Cancer Genome Project, Jones, C. M.; Marshall, C. J.; Springer, C. J.; Barford,
D.; Marais, R. Cell 2004, 116, 855.
9. We initially used
a homology model because no DFG-in structures were
We have discovered a series of novel inhibitors of mutant B-Raf
(V600E). The modular structure of the pyrazoline scaffold lent itself
well to analogue synthesis and we synthesized compounds that are
very potent in vitro. In particular, the discovery of the addition of
the C-1 fluoride to the phenol provided a significant increase in cell
potency. Furthermore, we have also identified fluorinated com-
pounds that possess outstanding pharmacokinetic properties and
in depth examination of these compounds in vivo activities is
warranted.
available. When these structures became available, they were found to be
nearly identical to the homology model. Initial attempts to dock 2 in the DFG-
out conformation proved to be unsatisfactory.
10. Annigeri, A. C.; Siddappa, S. Indian J. Chem. 1963, 1, 484.
11. Lange, J.; Coolen, H.; van Stuivenberg, H.; Dijksman, J.; Herremans, A.; Ronken,
E.; Keizer, H.; Tipker, K.; McCreary, A.; Veerman, W.; Wals, H.; Stork, B.;
Verveer, P.; den Hartog, A.; de Jong, N.; Adolfs, T.; Hoogendoorn, J.; Kruse, C. J.
Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 627.
12. Compounds were synthesized as racemic mixtures. The enantiomers of 2 were
separated via chiral HPLC revealing one enantiomer to be active (pERK IC50
280 nM) and the other to be inactive (pERK IC50: 14 M). Due to ease of
:
l
synthesis and time consuming methods required for HPLC separation we
evaluated all compounds as racemic mixtures.
13. Solubility was determined by a turbidimetric solubility assay which provides
the kinetic solubility of compounds in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer at
pH 6.8.
References and notes
1. Robinson, M. J.; Cobb, M. H. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1997, 9, 180.
2. (a) Heidorn, S. J.; Milagre, C.; Whittaker, S.; Nourry, A.; Niculesu-Davas, I.;
Dhomen, N.; Hussain, J.; Reis-Filho, J. S.; Springer, C. J.; Pritchard, C.; Marais, R.
Cell 2010, 140, 209; (b) Poulikakos, P. I.; Zhang, C.; Bollag, G.; Shokat, K. M.;
Rosen, N. Nature 2010, 464, 427; (c) Hatzivassiliou, G.; Song, K.; Yen, I.;
Brandhuber, B. J.; Anderson, D. J.; Alvarado, R.; Ludlam, M. J. C.; Stokoe, D.;
Gloor, S. L.; Vigers, G.; Morales, T.; Aliagas, I.; Liu, B.; Sideris, S.; Hoeflich, K. P.;
Jaiswal, B. S.; Seshagiri, S.; Koeppen, H.; Belvin, M.; Friedman, L. S.; Malek, S.
Nature 2010, 464, 431.
3. Davies, H.; Bignell, G. R.; Cox, C.; Stephens, P.; Edkins, S.; Clegg, S.; Teague, J.;
Woffendin, H.; Garnett, M. J.; Bottomley, W.; Davis, N.; Dicks, E.; Ewing, R.;
Floyd, Y.; Gray, K.; Hall, S.; Hawes, R.; Hughes, J.; Kosmidou, V.; Menzies, A.;
Mould, C.; Parker, A.; Stevens, C.; Watt, S.; Hooper, S.; Wilson, R.; Jayatilake, H.;
Busterson, B. A.; Cooper, C.; Shipley, J.; Hargrave, D.; Pritchard-Jones, K.;
14. Developed and marketed by Ambit Biosciences, KINOMEscan™ is
a
a
competition binding assay that quantitatively measures the ability of
compound to compete with an immobilized, active-site directed ligand (see:
DDR2(60%), EGFR(L747-S752del P753S)(58%), EGFR(S752-I759del)(55%),
EPHB3(65%), KIT(D816 V)(95%), LCK(66%), and RET(M918T)(70%). B-Raf
(V600E) and WT B-Raf were both inhibited at 100%. IC50 data was not
generated in the Ambit assay. In-house enzyme assays revealed the related
compound 2 to be equipotent against B-Raf (V600E) (IC50: 23 nM), WT B-Raf
(IC50: 17 nM), and C-Raf (IC50: 27 nM).
15. Pharmacokinetic experiments were performed by dosing either intravenously
(0.5 mg/kg or 1 mg/kg) or orally (10 mg/kg) in male SD rats.