never exceeded 10%.3,4 Imines 10 and 11 are thought to arise
from intramolecular ring opening of 7 to produce an
intermediate 8, with subsequent protonation or elimination
of a benzyloxy group to form 10 or 11, respectively.5
Because 10 was obtained without any significant deuterium
incorporation after chromatographic purification, we suspect
that the initial product of CH3OD quenching is 8 with M )
D and that deuterium/proton exchange as well as conversion
to 10 and 11 take place during workup. The origin of the
enol ether 12 was also somewhat perplexing, but the reason
for the apparent incorporation of methanol became more clear
when freshly prepared 7 was quenched with CH3OD at -78
°C. This afforded 9 and 12 without any of the other products
(ca. 1:1 9:12, 75% combined yield after chromatography).
Therefore, the other products (10, 11, dimer) result from the
thermal decomposition of 7, whereas 9 and 12 reflect
deuteration or methanolysis directly from 7 without prior
decomposition.
1.2 equiv of ZnCl2, 1.5 equiv of halide, 2.5 mol % Pd2(dba)3,
and 10 mol % [(tBu)3PH]BF4 (Table 1).
Table 1. Scope of the Negishi Coupling Procedurea
Although details of the methanolysis step were not
investigated, the conversion to 12 can be understood as an
example of zinc-assisted leaving group displacement by
CH3OD to generate 13, followed by 1,2-elimination. Prior
examples of analogous displacement have been noted, but
they are limited to simple structures such as XZnCH2X (X
) halide) and have not been investigated in depth.6 In the
present example, we suggest that CH3OD adds to 7 to
generate a transient zincate intermediate, followed by
deuterium transfer to nitrogen and internal methoxide transfer
to carbon as the aziridine C-N bond is cleaved.
Fortunately, the complex background reactions resulting
from the thermal decomposition of 7 at 25 °C could be
suppressed by using the more reactive catalyst Pd2(dba)3/
[(tBu)3PH]BF4 in place of Pd(PPh3)4 in the Negishi coupling.
This simple variation was so effective that none of the
undesired products 9-12 were detected if sufficient time was
allowed for complete conversion of 7 (ca. 3 h, rt). The scope
of coupling was evaluated in several representative examples
using a stoichiometry of 1 equiv of 5, 1.1 equiv of nBuLi,
a Reaction conditions: 1 equiv of 5, 1.1 equiv of nBuLi, THF, -60 to
-20 °C; 1.2 equiv of ZnCl2, -78 °C; 1.5 equiv of halide, 2.5 mol %
Pd2(dba)3, and 10 mol % [(tBu)3PH]BF4, 25 °C.
The aromatic halides iodobenzene (entry 1) and methyl
4-bromobenzoate (entry 2) gave satisfactory yields of 15 and
17, respectively. The alkenyl halides vinyl bromide (entry
3) or iodoacrylate 20 (entry 4) also afforded coupled products
under the standard conditions. Similarly, iodoindole 22
reacted with 7 to produce the desired aziridine 23, although
in moderate yield.
(2) Mizota, I.; Matsuda, Y.; Hachiya, I.; Shimizu, M. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 3977
.
(3) The dimeric product is tentatively assigned structure ii on the basis
of NMR and MS data (see Supporting Information). By analogy to
Hodgson’s lithiated N-Bus aziridines,4 intermediate i may be formed by
reaction of 7 with the carbene resulting from R-elimination, but elimination
of the NTrM fragment to produce ii contrasts with the N-Bus aziridine where
the aziridine C-N eliminates to give the symmetrical dimer. The trans
stereochemistry of ii follows from J2,3 ) ca. 3 Hz and remains unexplained.
To demonstrate the synthetic potential of aziridinylzinc
chloride 7, we have studied the conversion of aziridine 21
(Table 1, entry 4) into structures related to the antibacterial
agent L-furanomycin 24 and the analogue 25 (Scheme 2).7
We planned to assemble the dihydrofuranyl moiety of 25
by manipulation of the appended acrylate of 21 via Grignard
addition and intramolecular ring opening of the aziridine.
Thus, 21 was treated with CH3MgBr to afford the tertiary
alcohol 26, and subsequent acid-catalyzed aziridine cleavage
gave 27 (55% from 21). Reductive cleavage of the trityl
(4) Hodgson, D. M.; Humphreys, P. G.; Miles, S. M.; Brierley, C. A. J.;
Ward, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 10009
.
(5) (a) Florio, S. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 9683. (b) Luisi, R.; Capriati,
V.; Florio, S.; Ranaldo, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2677. (c) Troisi, L.;
Granito, C.; Carlucci, C.; Bona, F.; Florio, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
2006, 775. (d) Capriati, V.; Florio, S.; Luisi, R.; Mazzanti, A.; Musio, B.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3197. (e) Florio, S.; Luisi, R. Chem. ReV. 2010,
110, 5128.
(7) (a) Zimmermann, P. J.; Blanarikova, I.; Ja¨ger, V. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 910. (b) Zimmermann, P. J.; Young, J. L.; Hlobilova, I.;
Endermann, R.; Ha¨bich, D.; Ja¨ger, V. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 3450.
(6) (a) Wittig, G.; Wingler, F. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1962, 656, 18. (b)
Hoberg, H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1962, 656, 15.
5086
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 22, 2010