5912
G. Le et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 5909–5912
37, 3100; (b) Thompson, S. K.; Eppley, A. M.; Frazee, J. S.; Darcy, M. G.; Lum, R. T.;
Tomaszek, T. A., Jr.; Ivanoff, L. A.; Morris, J. F.; Sternberg, E. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 1994, 4, 2441; (c) Cohen, F.; Koehler, M. F. T.; Bergeron, P.; Elliott, L. O.;
Flygare, J. A.; Franklin, M. C.; Gazzard, L.; Keteltas, S. F.; Lau, K.; Ly, C. Q.; Tsui, V.;
Fairbrother, W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 2229.
the studied substitutions, cyclic urea 41 appeared the most prom-
ising with an EC50 value of 6 nM. Importantly, the inhibitory
activity of this compound displayed a small shift (<threefold) in
cell-based assays conducted in a high (50%) serum environment
(data not shown).
5. (a) Ovenden, S. P.; Yu, J.; Wan, S. S.; Sberna, G.; Tait, R. M.; Rhodes, D.; Cox, S.;
Coates, J.; Walsh, N. G.; Meurer-Grimes, B. M. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 3255; (b)
In summary we have presented data that supports the utility of
azoles as a component of a metal binding motif in the acceptor–do-
nor–acceptor pharmacophore of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors. We
have examined eight different five-member ring azoles and estab-
lished that they can efficiently serve as an amide isostere when
placed adjacent to a 6,6 bicyclic pyrimidine core. Of the heterocy-
cles tested, introduction of the thiazole, oxazole and imidazole into
the scaffold resulted in the best anti-integrase and antiviral poten-
cies. We further demonstrated that in contrast to that of the amide
setting, within the heterocyclic environment a nitrogen atom
rather than an oxygen atom appears to be the preferred hetero-
atom for metal co-ordination. Finally, the initial SAR presented
here demonstrated that these compounds are highly potent leads
amenable to further optimization to generate inhibitors of HIV
integrase. A comprehensive lead optimization of these promising
leads is underway and the results will be reported in due course.8
Combined strand transfer assay: briefly, for
a 96-well format, 400 ng IN is
incubated with 30 nM pre-processed substrate DNA, consisting of annealed U5
LTR sequence oligonucleotides tagged with Digoxigenin (DIG; 50-ACTG
CTAGAGATTTTCCACACTGACTAA-AAGGGTC-DIG-30) or biotin (50-Bio-GACCC
TTTTAGTCAGTGT-GGAAAATCTCTAGCA-30) so that each substrate has either a
DIG or Bio tag on opposite strands. Reactions are carried out for 2 h at 37 °C,
products generated as a result of 30 processing and strand transfer activity are
bound to streptavidin plates and detected using anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase
conjugate and p-nitro phenyl phosphate substrate.; (c) Inhibition of HIV
replication: cells are seeded into 96-well microtitre plates at 50,000 cells per
50
prepared to 4ꢁ final concentration in RF-10/2, and 30
(40 l in RF-10/2 containing 1600 pfu) is added to each well or 40
negative controls and for assaying compound cytotoxicity. After 24 h, an
additional 90
l of media or media containing 1ꢁ compound is added to each
well. At 4 days post infection, 100 l of media is removed from each well and
replaced with 100 l of fresh media with or without compound. Forty eight
hours later supernatants are harvested and levels of extracellular p24
determined. Supernatants are diluted in 10,000 and p24 levels assayed
l
l per well in RF-10 containing 2
l
g/ml polybrene (RF-10/2). Compounds are
l added to cells. Virus
l RF-10/2 for
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
using the Vironostika p24 assay kit. EC50 is calculated as the concentration
required to inhibit HIV p24 production to 50%.; (d) Chang, T. L.-Y.; Francois, F.;
Mosiam, M.; Klotman, M. E. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 6777.
6. Hare, S.; Gupta, S. S.; Valkov, E.; Engelman, A.; Cherepanov, P. Nature 2010, 464,
232.
References and notes
7. (a) Boros, E. E.; Edwards, E. C.; Foster, A. S.; Fuji, M.; Fujiwara, T.; Garvey, P. E.;
Golden, L. P.; Hazen, J. R.; Jeffrey, L. J.; Johns, A. B.; Kawasuji, T.; Kiyama, R.;
Koble, S. C.; Kurose, N.; Miller, H. W.; Mote, L. A.; Murai, H.; Sato, A.; Thompson,
B. J.; Woodward, C. M.; Yoshinaga, T. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 2754; (b) Melamed,
Y. J.; Egbertson, S. M.; Varga, S.; Vacca, P. J.; Moyer, G.; Gabryelski, L.; Felock, J. P.;
Stillmock, A. K.; Witmer, V. M.; Schleif, W.; Hazuda, J. D.; Leonard, Y.; Jin, L.; Ellis,
D. J.; Young, D. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5307; (c) Johns, A. B.;
Weatherhead, G. J.; Allen, H. S.; Thompson, B. J.; Garvey, P. E.; Foster, A. S.;
Jeffrey, L. J.; Miller, H. W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1802.
8. Le, G.; Vandegraff, N.; Rhodes, D.; Jones, E.; Coates, J.; Lu, l.; Li, X.; Yu, C.; Feng, X.;
Deadman, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 5013.
1. Summa, V.; Petrocchi, A.; Bonelli, F.; Crescenzi, B.; Donghi, M.; Ferrara, M.; Fiore,
F.; Gardelli, C.; Gonzalez Paz, O.; Hazuda, J. D.; Jones, P.; Kinzel, O.; Laufer, R.;
Monteagudo, E.; Muraglia, E.; Nizi, E.; Orvieto, F.; Pace, P.; Pescatore, G.;
Scarpelli, R.; Stillmock, K.; Witmer, V. M.; Rowley, M. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51,
5843.
2. Vandegraaff, N.; Engelmanm, A. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2007, 9, 1.
3. Jones, E.; Vandegraff, N.; Le, G.; Choi, N.; Issa, W.; Macfarlane, K.; Thienthong, N.;
Winfiled, L.; Coates, J.; Lu, L.; Li, X.; Feng, X.; Yu, C.; Rhodes, D.; Deadman, J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 5913.
4. (a) Thompson, S. K.; Murthy, K. H. M.; Zhao, B.; Winborne, E.; Green, D. W.;
Fisher, S. M.; DesJarlais, R. L.; Tomaszek, T. A., Jr.; Meek, T. D. J. Med. Chem. 1994,